Everybody here gets the gist of what I say well enough and he is no different [...] So in his desperation he hints that my point is mere word salad.
Let's see some more of the stuff he says everybody here gets the gist of.
Any motion started kills the point on the spot instantly filling it up with all dimensions at once. Straight line is point in motion and the reality of motion, that is all gravity after all, is such that straight lines are not sustainable for any too long tending to curve thus straight line in motion is a circle and circle in motion is a sphere.
In other words straight line is a circle at rest while a point is a motionless straight line.
Mind is none else than thinking light being naturally caused at that rate all cause is passing into all effect at. Like the light is the bridge linking space and time, the mind ties the now and the here into the tightest knot there is. The totality of space, after all, is all the distance that can be lit in time. Just as mind is thinking light, light is shining mind and the visible causality.
It could be said that space is the heat is space spent in motion measured by time or any other way round.
The relations between the sides of a triangle are strict geometry: space, time and light are to be studied as a triangle and the relations between them are be taken accordingly and can be violated only inside the head of a modern theorist and that simple consideration alone should put paid to all the expanding universe fantasies where space behaves like a magic carpet and the galaxies are accelerating like a bunch of scared pigeons.
Nothing is all that does not exists and what does not exist may take no place to exist and what take no place to exist may need no volume to succeed in being perfectly absent.
Thus to be expanding into nothing as your fairy-tale of a theory claims in the physical and measurable terms may mean to be gaining all the volume nothing may be losing to it in the process.
The volume that is possible to gain from nothing is no volume the nothing is capable of possessing. That volume may equal zero necessarily. A zero increase in volume possible for the universe translated in plain English is the retention of the same size and volume as ever.
That is logic, my friend, and no seven million peer reviews you may need to ignore it can change a letter of it. That's Aristotle for you. You may choose to be smug towards the man but that won't last long unless your peer-reviewers discover a magic trick of accelerating their expanding angular momentum.
Their concepts brave and porous
they all dare rave in chorus
Thus it is clear that finally dimensionless point is but sphere at rest and sphere is point in motion while motion and rest do not exist on their own but only in dialectical opposition to each other. They are mutually implied.
No planets teeming with life without the galaxy superclusters and their constituent quarks is the real deal at any observable instant, I am afraid.
™ Version 4.2
(1)