abiogenesis

Well, the dialectical opposition here is between very great and very small. The average which is the result of the clash between great and small is the resulting third term. In this case this is the ordinary scale of existence. What is your objection to that? Great and small are implied in each other while the average is implied in both as the middle term. That's both dialectics and relativity for you and as I contend both dialectics and relativity are cavalierly disregarded in the consensus cosmology I am opposed to. Well, relativity is paid a lot of lip-service to in the process of being denied.
Simple.

Well, it might be stupid nonsense as you allege here without explaining why, or it is just that dialectics as I suspect is something you are incapable to grasp. You are not alone in that as the idea that a Planck particle, i.e. something very small could have existed on its own and in an absolute isolation while embedded in pure nothing at the time zero is embraced by millions of professionals as the height of current scientific wisdom.
Here the idea that seems to you not to be any stupid nonsense is that the very small can possibly exist without implying the simultaneous existence of very great and of the middle term of the average in between. It is supposed to be capable of later evolving into the very great not yet ever existing at the time of the original explosion. That is expanding into the nothing it was originally enclosed in.
Which view is stupid nonsense here and which is not is the question.