Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God's motivation
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 1 of 33 (632798)
09-10-2011 8:44 AM


Hello EvC posters,
I am curious about what the different faiths say about God's motivation to create the universe and humanity.
Why would he/she/they do it?
To get the ball rolling I found one creation myth that should appeal to the scientists among us.
Disclaimer : There are a number of different variations of the myth. This version uses the most common factors of the dozen or so differnet ones I read. Also, on the tiny chance that one of the readers is actually a follower of this particular faith, I apologise in advance if I have made any big errors.
The Mande people of Southern Mali in Africa believe this was all a failed experiment.
The Mande Creation Myth
The creator god Mangala was actually attempting to create a specific type of seed (balaza seed). He failed in the first attempt. Then he made some different seeds, a pair that would become the universe. Then, continuing to experiment, he made many more seeds that became the elements, the four directions and finally the first people. All of this experimenting was occuring in an egg floating in the universe.
One of the humans, Pemba, broke out of the egg. A torn peice of that humans placenta became the Earth. The Earth, created from his placenta was barren so he tried to resturn to the egg. Unfortunatey, the egg had become the sun so he could not go back in. Instead, he stole more seeds from Mangala (the creator god) and planted them on Earth. These seeds were impure because they were stolen and everything that grew from them turned red.
Another human, Faro, was sacrificed to atone for Pembas sins and to purify the Earth. He was cut into 60 pieces and spread accross the Earth. Mangala chose to resurrect Faro and gave him an ark. Mangala also gave him 4 more men and 4 more women. These people were the original ancestors of mankind. The ark also contained all of the plants and animals. Then there was a great flood that washed away all of Pembas imputies. Only Faro, and the people on the ark remained to populate the Earth.
So, the universe was created by accident. God was actually trying to do something else (like the discovery of viagra. It was invented as an angina drug, during testing another use was discovered).
The Earth was also created by accident. A pesky, impatient human created it.
It seems that people were created to fix everything that the escapee messed up.
Sources :
Mand creation myth - Wikipedia
http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/18039750
KeeperofStories: Mand Creation Myth
http://dickinsg.intrasun.tcnj.edu/...html#The%20Mande%20Myth
The subject I am interested in discussing is the motivations of God to create the universe and humanity.
If you have scripture to go on, that is great. If there is no scriptural backup but your faith has some ideas, just as good. If you know the moivation put forward in any other faiths, I would be interested to know also.
This is more of a discussion rather than a debate.
Cheers,
Butterflytyrant

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by iano, posted 09-10-2011 12:30 PM Butterflytyrant has replied
 Message 8 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-13-2011 5:55 AM Butterflytyrant has not replied
 Message 11 by Omnivorous, posted 09-14-2011 2:26 PM Butterflytyrant has not replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 4 of 33 (633089)
09-12-2011 11:22 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by iano
09-10-2011 12:30 PM


Hello Iano,
Sorry for the slow reply. I was caught up in another (probably pointless) debate.
I really enjoyed reading your response. I think you have captured quite a special part of Christianity. I dont think people often think about their chosen Gods motivations.
Not only is it a particularly admirable and becoming sentiment but it very neatly deals with the issue of free will puts the blame of all sin on man.
I am not saying that is a bad thing. It would not be a great religion if it did not cover all of the bases.
If I were not an athiest, I believe that this sort of idea would sit very well with me. It would give me quite a sense of satisfaction. It would make it easier to relate to God.
One of the reasons I was curious about this is because I do not understand the faithful. Of any religion.
Answers like yours help me to understand the other team.
Is this your personal interpretation or is this based on scripture? Is it a particular denominations position?
One thing I have trouble with is this bit (I dont want to start a debate about it, this is my own personal comment)
Everybody will make a decision as to which it is they will remain cleaved to or which it is they will long to be rid of. And God will grant each their hearts desire.
I dont have a choice about whether I believe or not. I have never had any faith. From what I understand, I will never have the chance of entry into heaven. I will never be able to seriously attempt to communicate with God. I was made this way. my hearts desire is to live as a good man. I dont break any serious laws. I love my family. I am a good citizen. But, regardless of how good my life is, if I cannot manage to make a serious attempt at talking to God. I am hellbound. This may not be how your particular variant of the church works though. Many are more flexible. Faith seems to be a requirement though.
I like the idea of religion though. Particularly when it is presented like you have done.
Cheers,
ButterflyTyrant

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by iano, posted 09-10-2011 12:30 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by iano, posted 09-15-2011 10:15 AM Butterflytyrant has replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 5 of 33 (633090)
09-12-2011 11:23 AM


Anyone else?
Anyone else out there have a different motivation for God, or a different religions God?

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Wollysaurus, posted 09-12-2011 11:35 AM Butterflytyrant has replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


(1)
Message 7 of 33 (633212)
09-13-2011 5:05 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Wollysaurus
09-12-2011 11:35 AM


Re: Anyone else?
Hello Wollysaurus,
I agree. That is quite an appealing idea.
There would have to be other interpretations of biblical scripture that would lead to 'unacceptable' ideas.
I am an athiest and actively protest against organised religion.
But I have a favourite priest. The mans name is Peter Kennedy. He was sacked and told to hand over the keys after being a priest for 40 years. 28 of which were in a church in my neighborhood.
The Archbishop claimed that he had "caused harm to ecclesiastical communion in spite of frequent requests from me to do otherwise". And in a statement he said: "This decision brings me no satisfaction as division within the Church is contrary to all that Christ taught."
Father Kennedy stated that he was out of line with Cathloc teaching. He said "we have broken liturgical rules. We have treated people as adults, we have embraced gay and lesbian people, we have women coming into our community to preach."
(Source: Priest fired for unholy communion)
The guy is a legend in my area. He looks after the people that no one else cares about. One of the things that lead to him being sacked was the Micah Project.
This is the mission statement for the Micah Project -
quote:
Vision Statement
Our hope is to create justice and respond to injustice at the personal, social and structural levels in church, government, business and society.
Mission Statement
To respond to people who experience exclusion, poverty, injustice and social isolation so that they may experience inclusion, economic wellbeing, justice and connection within their community of choice.
(Source : http://www.micahprojects.org.au/about-us/guiding-principles)
He now operates a spiritual service called St Marys in Exile (his old church was St Marys) where all but a few of his old church congregation (100's) attend.
Sacking the guy who was doing everything that a priest should be doing and more is not a good thing for the Catholic church. It does not help to have radical ideas.

I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Wollysaurus, posted 09-12-2011 11:35 AM Wollysaurus has not replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 22 of 33 (634411)
09-21-2011 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by rueh
09-15-2011 7:26 AM


Hello Rueh,
How can we rule out function for the universe, if we cannot view it from a total perspective.
This is an interesting idea.
I wonder how humanity would handle itself if we were to discover that we were actually created for some rather mundane function. Dr A's suggestions would probably leave us fairly deflated.
Here we are, thinking we are pretty grand, then we find out that we are in fact, just an ornament. Or a reality TV show. We would probably find out if we were cancelled.
In general, we seem to think we are pretty damn important. Many believe that we may be unique in this universe. Many believe that we were created for a special purpose. That we are loved and cared for by a higher power.
It would certainly deflate some egos if we were the equivelant of a high school science project. And that we were actually just one of twenty treatements in that experiment.
What effect would this have on athiests I wonder?
If athiests discovered that the big bang was actually the start of an experiment and that there was someone (something?) watching us with mild interest, what would we do with that information?
What would the religious people of the world do?

I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by rueh, posted 09-15-2011 7:26 AM rueh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by rueh, posted 09-21-2011 11:56 AM Butterflytyrant has seen this message but not replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


Message 23 of 33 (634421)
09-21-2011 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by iano
09-15-2011 10:15 AM


Hello Iano,
I wonder what a person does when all their objections have been neutralized?
a rational person would capitulate.
An irrational person would continue to object without seeing or believing that their objections had been neutralized.
Some people will maintain the view you currently have of yourself ("not perfect but all told, not such a bad chap - a 7 or 8 out of 10 perhaps") to the very end.
Depending upon whose method of measurement is being used my 'score' could range from 0 to 10. My support of gay marriage could reduce my score to 0 by some even if I was devoutly religious and given a 10 by others. Personally, I would give myself a stout 7.
An alternative is to be persuaded that the pride and selfishness that motivates so many of your thoughts and actions is a constant companion - a rabid dog that demands being fed by you all day every day. The only difference between the two types of person is that the one suppresses truths that God attempts to bring to light (and in so doing, evades the very conclusion of the rabid dog within) and the other one has given up suppressing. Stop suppressing truth and a life of shit will surely rise to the surface. Nothing is guaranteed to bring you to your knees faster than being swamped in a sea of truth about yourself
Thats the thing. I own my 'sins'. I am fully aware of and accept all of my selfish desires and am comfortable with my sense of pride. My sins are mine to carry and mine alone. I know what they are better than anyone. They do not bring me to my knees. I accept them. I do not hoist my sins onto anyone elses shoulders. No one can take my sins away from me. I would not allow it even if I beleived the offers from various religions to be true. I believe it would be immoral of me to pass my sins off onto anyone. So I would not accept the offer for Jesus to take my sins from me. I dont need or want a whipping boy.
Then there's the response you form to an emptiness 'installed in you' by God. An emptiness that can't be filled with anything the world has to offer. You can attempt to fill it and pretend you are satisfied. You can try say that such emptiness is just a part of life and that you just need to grin and bear it. You can create any number of purposes and meanings for a life that insists there is meaning .. or go the nihilistic route and say there is no ultimate meaning.
I dont feel this emptiness. I feel stuffed to the brim and often annoyed that I cant jam more in. The universe around me, the people I know, the life I lead etc all fill me completely. I am not pretending I am satisfied. I dont know if satisfied is the right word. I dont think I will ever be satiated because there is always more to experience, more to see, stronger love, joy and amusement to feel. I think it would be a great pity if I ever feel satisfied. Satisfied seems rather bland. I want to be hungry for more.
I also dont beleive that we are all entitled to a life of meaning. We have to work to have a life of meaning.
Those are but two of the ways in which a person can construct their ultimate response to Gods inquiry of them. They can believe him or disbelieve him on these matters - without a requirement that they've even heard of Him.
So from my responses, would I get a shot at heaven?

I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by iano, posted 09-15-2011 10:15 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by iano, posted 09-21-2011 12:26 PM Butterflytyrant has replied
 Message 32 by Dawn Bertot, posted 09-27-2011 5:16 PM Butterflytyrant has seen this message but not replied
 Message 33 by 1.61803, posted 09-27-2011 5:48 PM Butterflytyrant has seen this message but not replied

  
Butterflytyrant
Member (Idle past 4448 days)
Posts: 415
From: Australia
Joined: 06-28-2011


(1)
Message 27 of 33 (635130)
09-27-2011 3:10 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by iano
09-21-2011 12:26 PM


Sorry about the slow reply
Hello again Iano,
Even if God were proven to exist. I am not sure I would want to worship him anyway. If he were proven to exist, there would still be just as many interpretations as to which way he is to be worshipped and what exactly consitutes sin.
my comment - Personally, I would give myself a stout 7.
your reply - Like I say, it's a pretty typical self-assessment that folk arrive at (even amongst serious criminals like rapists and murderers). Those that come to belief in the Christian God will in so coming (the Christian God indicates) have a somewhat dimmer view of themselves. The question is, whose self-assessment is objectively the correct one.
"Blessed are the poor in spirit (or 'have a very dim view of their moral worth') for theirs is the kingdom of God"
I would agree with this. I know a murderer and he still believes he is a good person. I happen to agree with him. He is a good person. He did one terrible thing. But he is still a good person. He will be in jail for the next 10 or so years before he even gets a chance to get out. He is a good person. I wont go into the detail but if I was in his particular situation, I would probably have commited murder as well. Does it make me a bad person knowing this? Am I a bad person because I would do the same thing or do I only become a bad person if I actually do it?
If Gods motivation was to put us to some sort of a test, then I have not passed this test. If, in this specific instance, I was to be tested, I am pretty sure I would fail. So is God purposfully allowing me to avoid this test in order to pass? Is God giving me a get out of hell free card?
I think it is pretty rough that in order to be blessed you have to have a dim view of your own moral worth. That seems a little masochistic to me.
You are comfortable with your sin and selfishness and the burden of your sin appears to weigh lightly on your shoulders. As mentioned, the technical term for the means whereby you maintain this position is called "suppression of truth".
This is not true. I am not comfortable with my sins. Also, the burden of my sins does not weigh lightly on my shoulders. It is important to note that they are squarely on my shoulders. I will not and would not want to have someone else carry my sins. I am not suppressing anything. I carry my sins because they are mine to carry. They are neither light nor comfortable. But bear them I must.
The word 'suppression' and 'truth' are not accidental words. If sin truly is an ugly, stinking thing and you suppress it out of view then of course you won't recoil from it. Of course you'll live in harmony with it. Of course you won't see any problem with it.
Wouldnt handing your sins over to someone else and carrying on guilt free be considered to be suppressing them out of view? I do not live in harmony with my sins. I attempt to atone for them. I will not pass my sins onto another to deal with them for me. That is suppression. That is passing the buck.
The outcome of the truth about your sin rising to the surface and into (your) full view isn't that you'll deign to accept Jesus' offer. Instead, the horror of it will have you run headlong and in desparation into his arms. All that has to happen is that
a) your sin be tremendously ugly and smelly
b) your sin become completely visible to you.
Both of the above are eminently possible so I wouldn't be too dogmatic on what can or cannot occur.
If the Earth was created in order for us all to go through this big trail then it would be a pretty cruel deal. A region is created, where individuals who are predisposed to sin are placed. Then commanded not to follow their own desires. Desires that were part of our design. When we do sin, we get to happily pass these sins of onto another. Never having to actually pay for them ourselves. Only if we do these things do we get rewarded. Thats a pretty terrible game.
If you don't feel you can do enough to fill yourself to satisfaction then you're agreeing exactly with what I'm saying. If there always is a hunger that can't quite be filled then you are singing from the same hymnsheet as me.
Now I'll grant that this hunger isn't necessarily one that drives you to the distraction that has you kneel at the Lords feet. Not all will be saved and not all will be saved this minute. But you are testifying to the presence of the basic elements involved in salvation:
Why would god fill me with an inate sense of curiosity and an above average brain, then tell me that that exact curiosity is a sign that I need god? Why make me a certain way if that is not going to be acceptable? I would never approach God if I new that I would never feel the desire to expore and know more. It is one of the greatest parts of my life.
With God there is plenty more to find out, plenty more to hunger for. But it's a different kind of appetite and a different kind of filling. The things of the world aren't designed to fill in the way the Lord does.
What if I have no interest in what he is selling? I currently have no desire to explore the Christian religion. What if the desire never comes?
Your responses are those of a lost person - there's nothing particularly unusual in their general thrust. All lost people get a chance of salvation.
I dont feel lost. If I dont feel lost, why would I look to be found? If part of Gods motivation for creation was to put us in situations that we would like to be found, then this is also unnappealing. This would mean that God has created an environment that is so shit that we run to him for help. Would it not be better to create a good environment and put the offer on the table. It seems like Gods motivation is to sell us a dubious product at gunpoint.
Although I wouldn't have the temerity to suggest where you might be along the path, I'd wager that someone who scored themselves a good degree less that you do and who found the worlds treasures didn't fill an ache inside ... was further down it than you yourself. That's the territory I occupied shortly before I fell to my knees and my story would sound a common resonance with those who are found.
I may well be on the path. Who knows. I doubt it personally but from what I have read of God, he is a complicated chap. If I had been around for all eternity, I would probably want to liven things up a bit as well. It seems a pity that my own labours to atone for my sins, labours that have improved my sense of self worth, would actually lead me away from God. My attempts to deal with my sins, rather than hoist them unceremoniously onto a 200 years dead prophet, have improved my sense of pesonal worth and dignity. Because I feel better about myself for trying to right my own wrongs, I am actually distancing myself from God. This seems a bit wrong.
I also dont think I will live long enough to see all of the things I want to see in this world. I have a list and I will be very lucky to see it all done before the reaper taps me on the shoulder.
So it appears that because I have big dreams and that I have taken personal responsibility for my sins and actively work to atone for them, I will never get a chance at heaven.
If the opportunity to get into heaven was Gods motivation for making the world, it looks like the deck was stacked against people like me. When he made me, he would have been aware that I was detined to fail. Thats a bit rough wouldnt you say?
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning
Edited by AdminPD, : Removed warning

I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong
Butterfly, AKA, mallethead - Dawn Bertot
"Superstitions and nonsense from the past should not prevent us from making progress. If we hold ourselves back, we admit that our fears are more powerful than our abilities." Hunters of Dune Herbert & Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by iano, posted 09-21-2011 12:26 PM iano has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024