Potential Evidence for a Global Flood

His assertion is even sillier. He is claiming that a local flood can leave the Ark on a mountain.I would love to see the explanation for that. Maybe magic water that settles higher on one side than the other. Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

Too funny.{I'll try for even funnier - You get a 4 week suspension - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above, also off-topic banner.

To mention "fossils" when talking about the Biblical Flood is of course simply silly. The Biblical Flood, if it had happened, was far too recent to have anything to do with fossils.But even there you are simply wrong. Yes, by looking at fossilized bones you can tell how old the critter was when it died.But none of those have anything to do with the potential evidential proof of the flood I presented.The Biblical Flood, if it had happened, would have been a very recent event. And nothing in the example I presented has anything to do with how long any critter lived.The Biblical Flood myths say that all the critters on land and in the air with the exception of those critters on the fictional ark were killed during a very short period.If that were true, then every land and air critter living today, plant or animal, would be descended from the few critters on the ark.That would leave a genetic bottleneck marker in EVERY single living species of plant of animal, and the marker would be only a relatively few generations back.If the Biblical Flood happened, then that marker MUST be there.It ain't.Case closed.

In this thread several potential and essential pieces of evidence of the Biblical flood were presented, things that IF the Biblical Flood actually happened must be found.Unfortunately not one of the potential and essential pieces of evidence exists and thus the Biblical flood is refuted as completely as a claim that a score was made even when the game was not played.