|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Biological instinct in female to seek out a mate outside of the group. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2134 days) Posts: 6117 Joined:
|
Try again, with more content and less gibberish.
You really should try and address the point I brought up in two posts now. It renders your figures absolutely incorrect. Unless you can actually address that point there is no use in continuing.Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3697 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Its been addressed and I'm not budging from that point. I suspect that even if I laid down a 75% swing to gay you would still reject the math as gibberish. There is a point of no return - face upto it.
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2134 days) Posts: 6117 Joined:
|
Its been addressed and I'm not budging from that point. I suspect that even if I laid down a 75% swing to gay you would still reject the math as gibberish. There is a point of no return - face upto it. You have presented no math beyond that one simple three-line post. I demolished it easily, as the way you posted it did not include multiple births. Either come up with something new or give it up. You're only digging the hole deeper.Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3697 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Multiple births are generic and accounted for; this and any other issues do not impact once negative growth is surpassed by the time factor. There after there is only a diminishing result to point zero.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
If so, could there be an attempt at making it a little more explicit?
Otherwise, this topic is subject to getting shut down. AdminnemooseusPlease be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
And no one on the planet has anything good to say about a Brumie accent.
But I do remember some research about how attractive people found UK accents; this was was in an absolute sense, rather than about relative proximity. I'll try and find it. Edited by Larni, : Staying on topicThe above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chuck77 Inactive Member |
Taz writes: I jokingly asked my wife why she didn't marry him, and her answer was "ewww, it's like marrying my brother" Freeking lie. We have no idea what she really thinks. Do you actually really think she's going to say "well, you know hun, I really wanted to but he's outta my league, and I ended up with you, but hell, who wouldn't want to be with him".??? Of course not! Why the hell should we take HER word for it? What's HE say ABOUT IT?? Why give her all the chips? Women are often "selected" and not doing the "selecting". Maybe she wasn't selected or persued?
Later that day, I asked the in-law and her answer was basically the same. Yeah, no sheet.
Intrigued by both of their answers, I'd since asked a dozen other females and they all gave the same answer. Do you really think these women are being honest?? NO FREEKING WAY. Women are insecure. Women don't want us thinking they are insecure. NO woman is going to say well, I just wasn't what he wanted. Women will settle for men much more than we will settle for women. Most women settle and don't think they deserve a guy like the one you decribed. They are lying.
I asked them if they'd date and marry a man who they grew up with in the neighborhood if he was the perfect man of their dream, and they all gave me the same "ewww, that's nasty" answer. BS. Total BS. Are you kidding me? EVERY woman would want that! The problem is few women have that oppurtunity or he didn't want her and now it's to late. They aren't going to admit any of this to anyone, but deep down they know. What good is it to dwell on what didn't happen? Or that the "dream" didn't come true?
Have I stumbled upon an biological instinct in females to diversify the gene pool by having an instinctual negative reaction to mating a male that's near by? No you havn't. You've stumbled upon your wife and the other women you interviewed lying to your face as to not insult you or admit to themselves that the dream got away from them and there is nothing they can do about it now. Their in denial.
Creationist views are also welcomed Thank you. That's my creationist view. Nothing to do with biology, IMO. Taz, this of course is just(of course) a hypothesis. Your wife may very well be telling you the truth. Im sure your a great guy and a much better catch than that shmuck who was walking his dog. This is what I think tho, and that most women aren't living the dream. There are some that are, and they are happy and couldn't see marrying anyone else. Women want to marry their best friend. And if their best friend happens to be a great looking guy from the hood that they know so well that is every woman's dream, do you really think they are thinking "ewwwww"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3741 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
Cuckold writes:
For posterity. (Use peek) {hidden text}Taz writes: I jokingly asked my wife why she didn't marry him, and her answer was "ewww, it's like marrying my brother" Freeking lie. We have no idea what she really thinks. Do you actually really think she's going to say "well, you know hun, I really wanted to but he's outta my league, and I ended up with you, but hell, who wouldn't want to be with him".??? Of course not! Why the hell should we take HER word for it? What's HE say ABOUT IT?? Why give her all the chips? Women are often "selected" and not doing the "selecting". Maybe she wasn't selected or persued?
Later that day, I asked the in-law and her answer was basically the same. Yeah, no sheet.
Intrigued by both of their answers, I'd since asked a dozen other females and they all gave the same answer. Do you really think these women are being honest?? NO FREEKING WAY. Women are insecure. Women don't want us thinking they are insecure. NO woman is going to say well, I just wasn't what he wanted. Women will settle for men much more than we will settle for women. Most women settle and don't think they deserve a guy like the one you decribed. They are lying.
I asked them if they'd date and marry a man who they grew up with in the neighborhood if he was the perfect man of their dream, and they all gave me the same "ewww, that's nasty" answer. BS. Total BS. Are you kidding me? EVERY woman would want that! The problem is few women have that oppurtunity or he didn't want her and now it's to late. They aren't going to admit any of this to anyone, but deep down they know. What good is it to dwell on what didn't happen? Or that the "dream" didn't come true?
Have I stumbled upon an biological instinct in females to diversify the gene pool by having an instinctual negative reaction to mating a male that's near by? No you havn't. You've stumbled upon your wife and the other women you interviewed lying to your face as to not insult you or admit to themselves that the dream got away from them and there is nothing they can do about it now. Their in denial.
Creationist views are also welcomed Thank you. That's my creationist view. Nothing to do with biology, IMO. Taz, this of course is just(of course) a hypothesis. Your wife may very well be telling you the truth. Im sure your a great guy and a much better catch than that shmuck who was walking his dog. This is what I think tho, and that most women aren't living the dream. There are some that are, and they are happy and couldn't see marrying anyone else. Women want to marry their best friend. And if their best friend happens to be a great looking guy from the hood that they know so well that is every woman's dream, do you really think they are thinking "ewwwww"?If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3320 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Chucky writes:
Haha, does this go with their gay best friend as well?
Women want to marry their best friend. And if their best friend happens to be a great looking guy from the hood that they know so well that is every woman's dream, do you really think they are thinking "ewwwww"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chuck77 Inactive Member |
does this go with their gay best friend as well? Im sure the same rules apply, just different circumstances.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Do you really think these women are being honest?? NO FREEKING WAY. Women are insecure. Women don't want us thinking they are insecure. NO woman is going to say well, I just wasn't what he wanted. Women will settle for men much more than we will settle for women. Most women settle and don't think they deserve a guy like the one you decribed. They are lying. Are you being funny (in which case I don't get it) or are you being a fucking idiot? Edited by Larni, : No reason given. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9513 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
I can offer some research that may add some support to the idea. To be valid though we'd have to assume that there's more likelihood of dissimilar MHCs the farther away from your home group you are. Which seems reasonable.
quote: Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: MHC-dissimilar mating in Brazil
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 763 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
Welcome to EvC, Tangle!
This adds to the vague bits I posted above - smell having something to do with mating behavior in humans as well as white mice. I can imagine all sorts of research that could be done, but finding a population of undergrad students that would give up all artificial odorants could be challenging.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9513 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Thanks :-)
DNA analysis is unearthing some inconvenient truths about our mating habits.
quote: If we accept the hypothesis that women are programmed to seek diversity, why would they stick to one partner for all their children? Much better to get themselves a steady partner that can provide for the family, have a child by him, then seek another partner with different genes just in case? Cynical moi?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 828 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
I asked them if they'd date and marry a man who they grew up with in the neighborhood if he was the perfect man of their dream, and they all gave me the same "ewww, that's nasty" answer. BS. Total BS. Are you kidding me? EVERY woman would want that! The problem is few women have that oppurtunity or he didn't want her and now it's to late. They aren't going to admit any of this to anyone, but deep down they know. What good is it to dwell on what didn't happen? Or that the "dream" didn't come true? Have you thought that both these answers might be wrong. Maybe she doesn't want to marry him because he knows secrets about her. What about the time he caught her sniffing glue behind the bike sheds. Or what about the time her dress got ripped on a tree branch as they both ran from a dog and she had to scuttle home naked whilst he roared with laughter throughout the journey. Who would want to marry that?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024