Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,470 Year: 3,727/9,624 Month: 598/974 Week: 211/276 Day: 51/34 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Evolution Of Sleep
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 1 of 72 (636662)
10-08-2011 5:41 PM


How and why did sleep evolve? Which forms of life require sleep and which don't? What does this tell us about sleep and how it evolved? Is it possible for complex life to evolve that doesn't require sleep?
It has just occurred to me what a strange thing sleep is in a evolutionary context. A state of high vulnerability that has evolved. Why? Is there no way round it?
I have no answers or strong opinions of my own. I am just intrigued as to the purpose, need and hence evolution of sleep.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 10-09-2011 9:03 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-09-2011 12:21 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 10 by frako, posted 10-09-2011 1:23 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 28 by Robert Byers, posted 10-11-2011 2:25 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 4 of 72 (636667)
10-09-2011 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
10-09-2011 9:03 AM


When Did Sleep Arise In Evolutionary History?
You've obviously focused on human sleep. And that's all very on topic and fine. But from what little googling I have done on this it appears that all sorts of life on Earth sleeps. Not just mammals and reptiles but fish and even invertebrates (not sure about insects).
So at what point did sleep evolve and why?
Is it even possible for evolved complex lifeforms to exist without sleep?
If we meet intelligent aliens one day will they also need to sleep?
I have no idea. But insights from anyone who knows anything about this at all much appreciated.
Larni writes:
I've not touched on dreams but they are fascinating, too.
Indeed. If this thread catches on I'm sure we'll get onto dreams. I hope so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 10-09-2011 9:03 AM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by hooah212002, posted 10-09-2011 9:49 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 6 of 72 (636669)
10-09-2011 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by hooah212002
10-09-2011 9:49 AM


Re: When Did Sleep Arise In Evolutionary History?
In social animals very probably. But it doesn't seem to be prerequisite for sleep to be needed.
I have just come across the notion of "unihemispheric sleep" where one half of the brain sleeps whilst the other half stays alert for threat detection etc. Apparently some birds and aquatic mammals utilise this method of sleeping. Fascinating.
Here is a wiki link on non-human sleep:
Link writes:
Unihemispheric sleep refers to sleeping with only a single cerebral hemisphere. The phenomenon has been observed in birds and aquatic mammals, as well as in several reptilian species (the latter being disputed: many reptiles behave in a way which could be construed as unihemispheric sleeping, but EEG studies have given contradictory results). Reasons for the development of unihemispheric sleep are likely that it enables the sleeping animal to receive stimuli, threats, for instance, from its environment, and that it enables the animal to fly or periodically surface to breathe when immersed in water.
More generally:
Link writes:
Sleep as a phenomenon appears to have very old evolutionary roots. The nematode C. elegans is the most primitive organism in which sleep-like states have been observed. Here, a lethargus phase occurs in short periods preceding each moult, a fact which may indicate that sleep primitively is connected to developmental processes. Raizen et al.'s results[5] furthermore suggest that sleep is necessary for changes in the neural system.
The electrophysiological study of sleep in small invertebrates is complicated. However, even such simple animals as fruit flies appear to sleep, and systematic disturbance of that state leads to cognitive disabilities.
Link
So sleep seems to be a very early developed, and hence widespread, evolutionary phenomenon indeed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by hooah212002, posted 10-09-2011 9:49 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Larni, posted 10-09-2011 11:01 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 8 of 72 (636673)
10-09-2011 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Larni
10-09-2011 11:01 AM


Re: When Did Sleep Arise In Evolutionary History?
Larni writes:
I 'reckon' it did not evolve specifically but was a by product of the advent of the nervous system.
More than plausible.
So at what stage in the evolutionary development life did the nervous system evolve?
Are there any examples of creatures which exist today and straddle the divide between having a nervous system and not (and thus possibly straddling the sleep/non-sleep divide)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Larni, posted 10-09-2011 11:01 AM Larni has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 11 of 72 (636706)
10-10-2011 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by New Cat's Eye
10-09-2011 12:21 PM


CS writes:
It gets dark anyways, so you might as well just wait for when you can see. Being able to shut down while you're waiting and avoiding unnecessarily spending energy would be beneficial and so would the rebuilding aspects.
The circadian rhythm does indeed seem to be a feature of most life on Earth. Including plants as well as animals. No doubt it is a contributing factor to the evolution of sleep. But creatures evolved for polar conditions (where "days" and "nights" can last months) and those that dwell in caves, underground or deep within the oceans where day/night is of much less consequence all seem to sleep as well. So it can't be the whole story.
CS writes:
Pretty much every animal sleeps in some way, so it’s been important since early on. Fish and reptiles have a more primitive sleep state than birds and mammals. And even invertebrates have a shutdown mode. But I don’t think non-animals sleep. I guess that as you get more complex systems within organisms, the more they need to regulate them.
Perhaps unsurprisingly single celled organisms don't exhibit any signs of anything matching sleep. But nor (apparently) do squids and octopuses. How far do we have to go back to find a common ancestor with them I wonder?
CS writes:
Although, the energy input would have to be a lot higher so that might be preventative.
Isn't most of the energy humans consume taken up by the brain? And (as I understand it) the brain isn't really less active when we sleep. I might need to check my facts here. Also dolphins swim whilst asleep and birds fly!!! (mad!!). So how much energy is really being saved?
CS writes:
Don’t forget that predator-prey relationships have to form a balance, or the preds will eat all their food, so the vulnerability thing would kind of work itself out.
In the evolutionary arms race wouldn't it be a case (if possible) ever less sleep and improved nocturnal abilities rather than everyone agreeing to take the night off?
Strags writes:
Is it possible for complex life to evolve that doesn't require sleep?
CS writes:
I doubt it from our current state, but I suppose it would have been possible.
I am intrigued by the idea of intelligent evolved life that doesn't need to sleep. If it is possible then maybe one day we will meet some alien cousins who will consider our need to spend 30% of our life unconscious thoroughly and bewilderingly inefficient.
If of course the squids and octopuses haven't taken over by then....
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-09-2011 12:21 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-10-2011 10:26 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 13 by caffeine, posted 10-10-2011 11:04 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 14 by Larni, posted 10-10-2011 11:16 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 16 of 72 (636732)
10-10-2011 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Larni
10-10-2011 11:16 AM


Larni writes:
That's why we don't see any and organisms that would logically be better off without it (dolphins and swifts) not needing to sleep but have convoluted work arounds (sleeping one hemisphere at a time).
Isn't this unihemspheric sleep a great idea?
Imagine if humans did that! We'd be all emotional and unrestrained creativity half the time and logically minded pedants the rest
Larni writes:
I would hazard that organisms probably could exist that do not need sleep but they would be out competed by ones that do sleep.
In what way? Adapatability?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Larni, posted 10-10-2011 11:16 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Larni, posted 10-10-2011 12:00 PM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 17 of 72 (636733)
10-10-2011 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by caffeine
10-10-2011 11:04 AM


Interesting on the octopus. Given that even worms have been observed to sleep I was surprised to read that squid and octopus don't. But it seems they do after all.
Strags writes:
Isn't most of the energy humans consume taken up by the brain?
Caf writes:
20% of energy consumption seems to be the most commonly cited figure.
Yes - That is what I have seen too. But I don't think it uses any less when we sleep.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by caffeine, posted 10-10-2011 11:04 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 30 of 72 (636803)
10-11-2011 5:57 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by New Cat's Eye
10-10-2011 10:26 AM


CS writes:
Well, it could be... If the circadian rhythm was already a part of their evolution before they got to the poles/caves.
But that still wouldn't fully explain fish or deep sea dwellers would it?
CS writes:
If we're going back that far, I'd prolly bet that sleep evolved independently between Protostomes and Deuterostomes. Protosomes splits into antropods, flat worms, and mollusks (etc) while Dueterostomes splits into urchins, round worms and vertebrates (etc). I think that there's some disparity between the sleep that these two groups exhibit, so that could suggests its unrelated.
If that is correct - That sleep has evolved along two independent strands - It adds weight to the notion that it is something that most complex lifeforms will do. So - In the same way we might expect alien lifeforms to possess "eyes" of some sort (because they are bloody useful and have evolved independently in a number of forms) - It seems aliens might well sleep too. Bizzarre.
CS writes:
I don't know, but there's also a lot of "rebuilding" that goes on during sleep, which would still count as 'activity' even though its helping. Its still gonna require energy, but you're not doing all that other activity as well. If you didn't sleep, then you'd have to be rebuilding while you're doing your normal activities, and then all that together would require that much more energy.
OK. But let me put my question/line-of-thought another way. If we develop Artificial Intelligence would we expect to implement periods of sleep into our inventions? Kinda defrag time?
CS writes:
I see it as more of a balancing act than an arms race.
But isn't that like saying that if Cheetahs got too fast they'd all die out from over-eating? Whilst it might be logically true the incremental nature of change means that it doesn't happen like that. The Cheetah gets a bit faster and then the antelope does too (or vice versa) and the whole thing is kept in balance through graduality. But the ultimate result is escalation. So why not the same with regard to preying on sleepers?
CS writes:
But sleep seems like a good idea to me. Everything degrades and nothing can run forever......,
Well forever is a long time. But given the ability of organisms to repair themselves I don't see why the limit has to be tens of years rather than much longer. Trees live for centuries. Why, in theory, couldn't brains?
CS writes:
...it just makes sense to take a break every so often. Would you prefer to never have to sleep but then just have a lifespan that was 30% shorter? Would you sleep more for a longer life?
But I'm not sure why those have to be the choices.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-10-2011 10:26 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by caffeine, posted 10-11-2011 6:37 AM Straggler has not replied
 Message 37 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-11-2011 8:57 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 31 of 72 (636804)
10-11-2011 6:01 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Larni
10-10-2011 12:00 PM


Larni writes:
I remember some study about brain activity inducing tiredness (there seemed to be no significant difference between doing book learning and going on many fair ground rides).
That raises the question of what makes us tired. How do we know/recognise when we are tired? What triggers it? Is it some sort of chemical/hormone?
Can we learn anything about the biological nature of sleep from studying narcoleptics and insomniacs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Larni, posted 10-10-2011 12:00 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Larni, posted 10-11-2011 6:32 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 34 of 72 (636807)
10-11-2011 6:44 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by GDR
10-10-2011 7:31 PM


But even when awake it is possible to have very vivid hallucinations and visions (I'm not knowingly prone to such things but I have experienced my share of recreational drugs). And if I close my eyes I can very clearly imagine the face of my son (for example) who I last saw a couple of hours ago.
So I don't think such clarity is necessarily a feature of dreams specifically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by GDR, posted 10-10-2011 7:31 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Larni, posted 10-11-2011 7:19 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 41 by GDR, posted 10-11-2011 11:14 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 36 of 72 (636811)
10-11-2011 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Larni
10-11-2011 7:19 AM


Larni writes:
The act of being asleep can have more than one function.
I agree. I'm just not convinced by GDR's idea that images within dreams are necessarily superior.
I suspect the main difference is that when we dream it seems more real because we are not consciously aware that we are dreaming and that it isn't real.
Or something like that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Larni, posted 10-11-2011 7:19 AM Larni has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 38 of 72 (636813)
10-11-2011 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by New Cat's Eye
10-11-2011 8:57 AM


CS writes:
Would you want an engine that you never had to turn off but that you had to change the oil in on your way to work? Is your question why the oil doesn't just work longer? Or why there's no perfect engine?
Oh I don't know. It just occurred to me how odd sleep is in an evolutionary context. Apparently I find it more odd than most. Although some googling around suggests that the question of why exactly we sleep is at least deemed an interesting scientific question that we have yet to fully answer.
The fact that all complex lifeforms do seem to sleep and that it seems to have evolved at least twice independently (to our knowledge) suggests that there is something rather fundamental about it.
I suppose what I am asking (to put it into geek speak) is why it is that despite all our seeming biological refinements we are more like Windows operating systems than UNIX. Windows needs to rebooted all the blasted time whilst my record for a UNIX box is seven years and counting.
But now I am just letting my work frustrations infringe on the far more important activity of internet foruming......

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-11-2011 8:57 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by caffeine, posted 10-11-2011 10:09 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 42 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-11-2011 12:22 PM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 40 of 72 (636817)
10-11-2011 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by caffeine
10-11-2011 10:09 AM


Fair point.
In my own ignorance I took CS's speculations to be more authoritative than even he probably intended. I can't find any support for this claim either.
And I agree that it seems more likely that the origin lies in a common ancestor to both. Which makes sleep something that arose very very very early in our evolutionary past.
So where does that leave us on the 'Would evolved aliens also likely sleep?' question?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by caffeine, posted 10-11-2011 10:09 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 43 of 72 (636840)
10-11-2011 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by New Cat's Eye
10-11-2011 12:22 PM


What is so odd about sleep?
CS writes:
Why do you find it so odd? Anything besides the pred-prey relationship?
The apparent inefficiency of it. The vulnerable state it leaves us in. The fact that a whole mechanism for allowing our imagination to run wild (i.e. dreaming) whilst restricting us from acting out these fantasies (we apparently undergo a sort of mild induced form of paralysis whilst REM sleeping) has evolved. The fact that despite all of us all doing it (along with practically every other complex living thing on the planet) scientists still don't really understand why we do it or how exactly it works. The strangeness of phenomena like sleepwalking (people have apparently sent emails and even cooked whilst asleep!!!), narcolepsy and insomnia. The lack of rhyme or reason in how much sleep is needed (a giraffe needs less than 2 hours of sleep a day and an elephant about 3 - Why? I would have thought size would make sleep more necessary). Etc. etc. etc.
In general it just seems to be a very strange and interesting phenomenon. It just made me think - How the hell did that evolve? Apart from anything else with a five year old and one year old it is something which I am desperately short of and something which is much on my mind.
Link writes:
The first rapid eye movement (REM) period usually begins about 70 to 90 minutes after we fall asleep. We have around three to five REM episodes a night. Although we are not conscious, the brain is very active - often more so than when we are awake. This is the period when most dreams occur. Our eyes dart around (hence the name), our breathing rate and blood pressure rise. However, our bodies are effectively paralysed, said to be nature's way of preventing us from acting out our dreams.
Link writes:
So why do we sleep? This is a question that has baffled scientists for centuries and the answer is, no one is really sure. Some believe that sleep gives the body a chance to recuperate from the day's activities but in reality, the amount of energy saved by sleeping for even eight hours is miniscule - about 50 kCal, the same amount of energy in a piece of toast.
Link writes:
Python 18 hrs
Tiger 15.8 hrs
Cat 12.1 hrs
Chimpanzee 9.7 hrs
Sheep 3.8 hrs
African elephant 3.3 hrs
Giraffe 1.9 hr
Link
Link writes:
Sleepwalkers have been described to be involved in complex motor activities like cooking, eating, driving a car, playing an instrument, stabbing and murder
Link
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-11-2011 12:22 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Panda, posted 10-11-2011 5:05 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 55 by caffeine, posted 10-12-2011 4:11 AM Straggler has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 44 of 72 (636842)
10-11-2011 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by GDR
10-11-2011 11:14 AM


GDR writes:
With a bit of circular reasoning I think that it has something to do with the consciousness or mind being a reality that isn't a physical reality.
Whilst the mind body problem is a fascinating topic in itself (maybe I'll start a thread at some point) but let's not explicitly go there here. But on that note....You must admit that physical things (e.g. drugs) can induce dream like states, hallucinations and all of the other things that you seem to consider non-physical. Isn't sleep (and dreaming) just bio-chemistry at the end of the day?
GDR writes:
I think dreams have a lot to do with needing sleep and so I think that discussing dreams is consistent with the theme of this thread. I thought I’d add that before some sharp eyed admin tells me I’m off topic.
Well if I have any say as the starter of the topic I would like to agree with you in a bid to keep those sharp eyed admins at bay.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by GDR, posted 10-11-2011 11:14 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by GDR, posted 10-11-2011 2:52 PM Straggler has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024