i don't even know why you responded i got no beef with, you. you are one of the few (very few), people worth discussing anything on this site.
Thank you.
I responded because
I was the person who asked to see the supporting evidence, thus sparking the row-ette about whether or not I should have done so. So when you wrote this ...
like a broken record around here. if you had any skillz at debating you would provide evidence to refute an unsupported claim, rather than using the evc cop-out and ask for supporting evidence. attacking a claim and the evidence is a weak-sauce argument, using by posters who can't really come up with anything on their own to refute something.
... if that wasn't meant to apply to me, it really doesn't apply to anyone else on this thread either.