Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Awesome Republican Primary Thread
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 286 of 1485 (637981)
10-19-2011 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 283 by Nuggin
10-19-2011 12:01 AM


If you are an employee of a corporation which is doing the wrong thing under the current system
I keep asking and you keep evading the question. What does it mean for a corporation to "do" something?
Please be specific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 283 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:01 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 290 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:21 AM crashfrog has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 287 of 1485 (637982)
10-19-2011 12:14 AM


TOPIC ABANDONMENT!!!
You know the topic - Something about the current Republican primaries.
Adminnemooseus

Please be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems.

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 288 of 1485 (637983)
10-19-2011 12:16 AM
Reply to: Message 276 by crashfrog
10-18-2011 10:35 PM


It strikes me that the group that seems most often to ascribe to corporations a form of "personhood" they can't meaningfully have are the people, like you, who are supposedly opposed to "corporate personhood."
Could you rephrase that? Are you accusing me of not being able to identify an action a corporation can take, before even asking me?
Walk me through the process by which a corporation does something, as distinguished from the people who work for the corporation doing something.
An example: Bank of America donates half a million dollars to the Mitt Romney campaign fund. Shell Oil has an oil rig spill off the coast of Africa. Koch Industries dumping toxic chemicals in Kansas.
Corporations have no existence apart from the legal fiction that they're discreet units who can own property and delegate agency.
If that's all their personhood afforded them, there wouldn't be a problem. Which individual person from GM received the bailout money?

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by crashfrog, posted 10-18-2011 10:35 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:26 AM hooah212002 has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2519 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 289 of 1485 (637984)
10-19-2011 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 284 by crashfrog
10-19-2011 12:07 AM


Who wrote it? If its was produced by the corporation, and the corporation's only employee was you, then perforce you're the one who wrote it and therefore you're the one who violated the copyright.
A salesmen at the car lot did not build the car.
The guy who built the car did not design the car.
A producer does not write the script. The writer does.
Your name appears on the contract between you and your company, the one that allows you to be paid. And you have to be paid, right, because the studio pays your company for the TV show but somehow it has only a folding chair as assets. Where did those assets go? Obviously, they went to you
So, if I want to sue Ford for make a crappy car, I should sue Murray the Janitor at Ford Headquarters because he gets paid by Ford with the money they made off selling me the car?
That doesn't make sense. How is Murray directly responsible for this?
So, there's a paper trail between you "producing" a script that violates someone else's copyright,
You clearly don't understand what "producing" means.
Therefore you've profited from the violation;
So has Murray the Janitor.
and NugginCo has reported to the IRS that you were paid such and such amount for that work.
And Ford reported to the IRS that Murray was paid such and such.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 284 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:07 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:30 AM Nuggin has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2519 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 290 of 1485 (637985)
10-19-2011 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by crashfrog
10-19-2011 12:10 AM


Bringing it back to the topic
I keep asking and you keep evading the question. What does it mean for a corporation to "do" something?
Please be specific.
Okay, here's an example.
The supreme court has ruled that it is perfectly legal for a corporation to donate unlimited amounts of money to a republican candidate.
That is a corporation "doing" something. What it is doing is buying a politician.
If it's NOT the one doing it, then the USSC decision makes no sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:10 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:32 AM Nuggin has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 291 of 1485 (637986)
10-19-2011 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 288 by hooah212002
10-19-2011 12:16 AM


Are you accusing me of not being able to identify an action a corporation can take, before even asking me?
I'm accusing you of ironically reifying corporations in ways that don't make any sense. Ironically, because you claim to be opposed to "corporate personhood."
Bank of America donates half a million dollars to the Mitt Romney campaign fund.
No, you're not answering the question. (I think maybe it's too simple for you to grasp.) But ok, we'll use your example. Bank of America "donates." Well, ok. With what does "Bank of America" hold the pen to sign the check? Please be specific.
Which individual person from GM received the bailout money?
No individual person at GM received the bailout money. How are you not understanding "discreet units who can own property and delegate agency"? Money was transferred from an account in the name of the US Treasury to an account in the name of General Motors.
When you say that a corporation did something, precisely what do you mean? What do you mean by "Koch Industries dumping toxic chemicals in Kansas"? What did the corporation use to lift and open the barrels? Be specific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by hooah212002, posted 10-19-2011 12:16 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by hooah212002, posted 10-19-2011 12:29 AM crashfrog has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 828 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 292 of 1485 (637987)
10-19-2011 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 291 by crashfrog
10-19-2011 12:26 AM


Just saw Moose's warning. New topic, perhaps? I don't care either way.

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:26 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:33 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 293 of 1485 (637988)
10-19-2011 12:30 AM
Reply to: Message 289 by Nuggin
10-19-2011 12:19 AM


So, if I want to sue Ford for make a crappy car, I should sue Murray the Janitor at Ford Headquarters because he gets paid by Ford with the money they made off selling me the car?
No, you should sue whoever is liable for whatever damages you suffered.
How is Murray directly responsible for this?
You tell me! You're the one who wants to punish him. How did you manage to get the terms of the debate so completely backwards? I don't believe that he's responsible so I don't think he should be punished. Stop for a minute and quit acting like the only way to talk to me is to contradict literally everything I say. That relentless contrarianism never worked for Holmes and he was better at it than you are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:19 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 296 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:40 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 294 of 1485 (637989)
10-19-2011 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 290 by Nuggin
10-19-2011 12:21 AM


Re: Bringing it back to the topic
The supreme court has ruled that it is perfectly legal for a corporation to donate unlimited amounts of money to a republican candidate.
That's not the ruling of Citizens United. That's the effect of the ruling of Citizens United.
That is a corporation "doing" something.
Walk me through what the "corporation" is doing. When the corporation writes a check to the Republican candidate for office, how does it hold the pen? Be specific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:21 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 297 by Nuggin, posted 10-19-2011 12:41 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1493 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 295 of 1485 (637990)
10-19-2011 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 292 by hooah212002
10-19-2011 12:29 AM


Just saw Moose's warning.
Yeah I just saw it, too. Start a new thread if you like. I'd like to explore the notion of "corporate personhood", I think it's pretty fuzzy for you (and for pretty much everybody who is on about it.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by hooah212002, posted 10-19-2011 12:29 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2519 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 296 of 1485 (637991)
10-19-2011 12:40 AM
Reply to: Message 293 by crashfrog
10-19-2011 12:30 AM


quit acting like the only way to talk to me is to contradict literally everything I say. That relentless contrarianism never worked for Holmes and he was better at it than you are.
I'm not contradicting everything you say and I'm way better at it than Holmes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:30 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2519 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 297 of 1485 (637992)
10-19-2011 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 294 by crashfrog
10-19-2011 12:32 AM


Re: Bringing it back to the topic
Walk me through what the "corporation" is doing. When the corporation writes a check to the Republican candidate for office, how does it hold the pen? Be specific.
They don't actually write a check. They transfer money from one bank account to another electronically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by crashfrog, posted 10-19-2011 12:32 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 298 of 1485 (638095)
10-19-2011 5:24 PM
Reply to: Message 262 by hooah212002
10-17-2011 5:31 PM


redirect
actual reply: Message 14

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by hooah212002, posted 10-17-2011 5:31 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 299 of 1485 (638150)
10-20-2011 9:31 AM


These Foolish Things Remind Me Of You
Bored of doing real polls, the Pew Research Center has done a word association test instead.
The three words most people think of when they hear Rick Perry are: "Texas", "idiot" and "NO". The poll does not record what proportion of people responded with mute, wordless horror.

Replies to this message:
 Message 302 by IamJoseph, posted 10-20-2011 11:20 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3694 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 300 of 1485 (638168)
10-20-2011 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by bluescat48
06-28-2011 12:18 AM


Instead of playing a never ending bash each other game, I've yet to see an informative description of what either party is all about, and how they differ from each other's politics and agenda. In the big picture, what does a Liberal stand for? What is the agenda of Republicans? I honestly don't have a clue.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by bluescat48, posted 06-28-2011 12:18 AM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by 1.61803, posted 10-20-2011 11:19 AM IamJoseph has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024