|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What the KJV Bible says about the Noah Flood | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
There is much confusion about what the Bible says about the flood of Noah.
Genesis 1:9, 10 tells us the water was gathered to one place and dry land appeared which was called earth, or dry land if you prefer. There is no place that is stated that the land was divided prior to the flood of Noah. Genesis 6:7 tells us the LORD was going to destroy all creatures, both man, and beast, including the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air. Genesis 6:8 tells us, But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD. Genesis 6:13, 14 tells us God told Noah to build an ark and the following verses told him the size of the ark to build. Noah was told who his passengers would be. Chapter 7 tells us that the passengers arrived and were boarded. Genesis 7:11,12 tells us that the fountains of the deep was opened up and the windows of heaven were opened and it began to rain and did so for 40 days and 40 nights. The following verses tells us that the water was upon the earth 150 days before it began to receed, which took another 150 days. Genesis 10:25 tells us that the earth was divided in the days of Peleg. That being the case there would be no worldwide layer of anything left by the flood. In Message 1 iceage said:
quote: I will argue the Bible does not teach the flood transported immobile animals to higher elevations.. In Message 26 Buzsaw states:
quote: I will argue the Bible does not teach tectronic plate collisions took place during the flood. In Message 95 Buzsaw states:
quote: I will argue the Bible does not teach the flood induced tectronic activity Buzsaw proclaims. In Message 22 Taz said:
quote: I will argue there was no violent world wide flood. But that there was a world wide flood.
quote:Source I will argue the Bible does not support the catastrophic global flood described at the site and in their literature, this quote was taken from.
quote:Source I will argue that the geological history of the Earth is not taught in the text to be produced by the flood of Noah. I will argue the text found in the KJV , LXX, and Hebrew Text does not support any of the above arguments. I will argue the text found in the KJV , LXX, and Hebrew Text does support a world wide flood. I will also argue that the texts support an extended period of existence in which all the land mass was covered with water other than the flood of Noah in which all life forms died. God Bless,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi kbertsche,
kbertsche writes: ICANT--You seem to infer that there was only a single land mass at the time of Noah's flood. This begs some questions: I am not infering anything. I am stating that according to the text recorded in the Bible in the book of Genesis that the land mass was in one place at the time of the flood.
quote: God called the dry land ארץ. The water was in one place which would require the dry land mass to be in one place. There is no information about the sea level of that land mass or what the highest point was on that land mass. I can find no place the Earth was divided until after the flood. There are those who have claimed it was done during the flood (YEC beliefs.). There is no such support found in the text. If you have some and would like to present it please do. I find information where the ארץ was divided during the days of Peleg which was after the tower of Babel.
quote: The word Earth is translated from the same Hebrew word that the word Earth in Genesis 1:10 and 1:1 was translated from. The word Peleg is from the Hebrew word פלג as is the word divided in Genesis 10:25. The word פלג simply means division. Therefore according to the text the dry land mass as well that existed in Genesis 1:10 was divided in the days of Peleg which was after the tower of Babel. If you disagree then present your argument.
kebertsche writes: 1) roughly how long ago did this flood occur? The text does not say when the flood of Noah took place.
kbertsche writes: 2) presumably, the land was divided into continents subsequent to the flood? Do you have a rough timescale for this? The text does not say when the land mass was divided.
kbertsche writes: 2)3) how does your sequence and timescale of these events compare to the modern geologic record? I really don't know as I have never been able to have a meaningful conversation with anyone about what the timescale of those events would be. Remember I am argueing as to what the text in the Bibles put forth in the OP has recorded in them. If that could be settled then we could get into speculation of how those events took place. Without a foundation there is nothing to build upon. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
jar writes: No. The water being in one place does not require that the land be in one place. Well the text was talking about dry land there was wet land under all the water. But if you had 2 islands protuding out of that body of water you would have two places there was no water. With one island you would have the water in one place and the dry land mass in another place.
jar writes: BUT... that also has NOTHING to do with the Biblical Flood myths. But it has everything to do with the myths that have been put forth in all the flood threads I have read, here at EvC. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Percy,
Percy writes: The waters gathered together on the Earth's surface covering the entire globe. The waters did not have to gather together on the Earth's surface to cover the entire Earth.
quote: According to the text the water already covered the face of the Earth as the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters that covered the Earth.
quote: ויאמר and he is sayingאלהים Elohim יקו collect המים the waters מתחת from under חשמים the heavens אל to מקום place אחד one ותראה and seen היבשה the dry land ויהי and it became כז so The land mass appeared because the water was gathered into one place revealing the dry land.
Percy writes: God called the "gathering together of the water" seas. That's seas, not sea, as in more than one sea. ימים is a singular masculine verb meaning sea. It is not plural but has been translated plural many times as mankind can not think of the earth with one sea so it had to be seas. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Coragyps,
Coragyps writes: We can have one here, then. Am I correct in saying that Genesis claims that there were humans at the time of the big flood, The text of Genesis states there were people on Earth prior to the flood of Noah. It also places man on Earth as the first life form before the Earth was covered with the water we find at Genesis 1:2. So present your argument. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
jar writes: The text says that all the water was gathered together. There could be an unlimited number of islands or land masses. Does the following text say the water was gathered into one place?
quote: You can check it in the Hebrew in my post to Percy. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
Does the following text say the water was gathered into one place?
quote: God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi kbertsche,
kbertsche writes: So how do you interpret the biblical genealogies which YECs use to argue that these events are recent? I don't think I have committed to a time frame yet. Right now I would like to determine if the text says all the land mass was in one place prior to the flood. And that the land mass was still in one place when the flood took place. And that the land mass was divided in the days of Peleg. Lets clear that up before we move on. So why don't you answer the post you are replying to in the post I am replying too. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
Yes I can read English and Hebrew also. Can you answer a question? All you have to do is say Yes or No. Does the following text say the water was gathered into one place? Yes/No
quote: God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi jar,
Yes I can read English and Hebrew also. Can you answer a question? All you have to do is say Yes or No. Does the following text say the water was gathered into one place? Yes/No
quote: jar writes: Genesis 1 has NOTHING to do with the Biblical Flood Myths, was written hundreds of years later and by a different culture and tradition. I read it, I just disagree with that assertion. If the land mass was in one place that would require a lot less water to cover it. The land mass would be much smaller than it is today and the sea level could have been much less than it is today. So yes it would have a lot to do with the flood of Noah.
jar writes: Again, as I have pointed out to you several times now, that has NOTHING to do with the land being one continuous mass. Yes you have asserted that several times already. So why don't you present your argumentation that there can be thousands of islands and the Aral Sea, Caspian Sea, Dead Sea, Sea of Galilee, Great Salt Lake, and the Salton Sea all of which are not connected to any ocean but all the water is still in one place according to you. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi kbertsche,
kbertsche writes: I'd say that your interpretation is plausible, but I think it may press the text a bit too far. How does it press the text? In Message 10 I broke down Genesis 1:9 in the Hebrew with the meaning of each word. I also gave the Hebrew word that is translated seas which is a masculine singular verb. Singular is not plural. There was one sea. How could there be one sea if the Earth was as it is today. Today there is the Aral Sea, Caspian Sea, Dead Sea, Sea of Galilee, Great Salt Lake, and the Salton Sea and all of them are landlocked. That makes at least 7 places.
kbertsche writes: Yes, the text says that God gathered the waters together in one place (maqom echad). So you agree that the text says the water was gathered to one place and the dry land appeared. You just disagree as to what one place is.
kbertsche writes: Yes, the text says that the land was divided in the days of Peleg. So you agree that the Earth was divided in the days of Peleg. You just disagree as to what the Earth is. Could you clear up those two problems for me? In Genesis 1:1 ארץ is translated Earth. In Genesis 1:10 ארץ was translated Earth, which was the dry land that appeared when the water was collected in one place. In Genesis 10:25 ארץ was translated Earth. I really think the text was talking about the ארץ.
kbertsche writes: It could just as well be a large earthquake. Then why didn't Moses say the Earth was divided by an earthquake? It wasn't the people because they had already been scattered over the face of the Earth. Genesis 11:8 God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Joseph,
IamJoseph writes: Absolutely. Note that this is a pristine, technical writings - every word is important and impacting; nothing is superfluous; nothing is negatble. I can agree that every word is important and the meaning of those words are specific.
IamJoseph writes: The address was not to the world. Noah was the only one that found grace in the eyes of God.
IamJoseph writes: Note, no non-domestic animals are included Clean beast were eatable. Unclean beast were non-eatable. I think you could fit all beasts in that verse, as there was only two kinds, clean and unclean.
IamJoseph writes: Noah did NOT collect ALL the animals of the earth. That the animals Noah did not collect any animals. God sent them at the time for them to load on the ark. They had 120 years to get there.
IamJoseph writes: Lions and snakes do not do such; they would have to be rounded up for eons if this was meant. So they could not have traveled to the ark if God told them to go get on the ark. Is that what you are saying?
IamJoseph writes: Only Noah, his family and the animals referred to previously [no wild animals; domesticated owned animals are only listed]. Obviously, all the earth's animals could not fit into the dimensions of the boat - the reason the dimensions were specified. Where does the text say there was no wild animals? God gave the dimensions of the ark which was not a boat and He knew the animals He was going to send to get on the ark. Why wouldn't they fit. How big do you think the ark was? It could hold more than 500 railroad cars. My last drawing I drew had over 18 acres of floor space and I think I could get another 10 or more acres in it by designing rooms for the small critters.
IamJoseph writes: Do the math. Seven days is only supportive of a regional flood, listed here as 'THE EARTH'; read, earth here does not refer to the whole world! You do understand that it started to rain seven days later and then rained for 40 days and the fountains of the deep open up and water gushed forth out of them until the hightest point on the land mass was covered with 15 cubits of water. That water stayed there for 150 days total from the day it began to rain. Then it took another 150 days for the water to receed.
IamJoseph writes: Here, WINDOWS OF HEAVEN refers to rain, Yep it rained on the Earth and it don't say part of the Earth.
IamJoseph writes: Much confusion comes from terms such as "and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after its kind " The confusion comes when IamJoseph or someone else decides 'every' means some.
IamJoseph writes: Clearly, 'ALL FLESH' refers to only those that could fit in the ark; and then 'shut in'. More confusion as 'all' means some, according to IamJoseph.
IamJoseph writes: This refers only to Noah's region, proven by its previous verses: An assertion not supported by the text as it says the Earth, not Noah's part of the Earth.
IamJoseph writes: The waters did not bear up the boat till 'after' forty days; meaning this was not a global flood! How does when the ark floated have anything to do with whether the flood was global or local?
IamJoseph writes: A cubit is a foot [elbow to fingers]. Since when is a cubit a foot? The Hebrew short cubit was 17.5 inches.The Hebrew long cubit was 20.4 inches. The Egyptians and Bablonians had different length cubits. You can check them out Here IamJoseph writes: It must also be understood the writings describe how it appeared to the people of Noah's region, Why? Moses was the one doing the writing hundreds of years later.
IamJoseph writes: The term 'SWARMETH' refers to those animals not of Noah's possessions, The word swarmeth refers to critters that swarm.
IamJoseph writes: The term 'UPON THE EARTH' Refers to anything upon the earth.
IamJoseph writes: Note now 'ON THE GROUND' is used to describe 'EVERY LIVING SUBSTANCE', On the ground refers to on the ground. Every living substance refers to every thing that had the breath of life.
IamJoseph writes: Note that the fish were uneffected - namely this was NOT about ALL LIVING CREATURES ON THE FACE OF THE WHOLE EARTH. Gee I thought the fish were in the water that was on the whole face of the Earth. I did not know they were on the face of the dry land, where everything that had the breath of life died. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Dr,
Dr Adequate writes: I can't agree with your interpretation of the text about Peleg: Why would you agree with me you don't believe the Bible anyway.
Dr Adequate writes: There then immediately follows the story of the tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9) which I take to be the explanation of the separation in Gen. 10:32 and of the different languages in Gen. 10:31, because otherwise the whole thing wouldn't make any sense. Yes a few hundred years after the flood the people had multiplyed and was moving eastward. They decided to build a tower to heaven so they could not be scattered all over the face of the Earth. The people all spoke one language at that time.
quote: קוג translated scatter means scatter or disperse. קלג translated divided means divide, split, cleave. Genesis 10:25 ארץ translated Earth that the dry land in Genesis 1:10 was called. ארץ was translated Earth in Genesis 10:25 that was divided. עם translated people in Genesis 11:6 means people or nation. They were scattered not divided.
Dr Adequate writes: So there seems to be an obvious intepretation of what it means to say that "the earth was divided", Sure ther is, it says what it means and means what it says. The dry land mass that was called Earth in Genesis 1:10 was divided. The people in Genesis 11:6 who was building the tower was scatter upon the face of the Earth.
Dr Adequate writes: And Noah got his name because in his time there was much rain" You were doing real good until you decided to become a wise guy. Noah's name does not mean rain. It means rest. I really don't know why because he had a lot of work to do and I don't know when he got any rest.
Dr Adequate writes: "Adam was so called because of the incident with the tree" The Hebrew word אדם does not mean ate the forbiden fruit or anyother thing you can think of concerning the tree. The Hebrew word אדם meaning man or mankind is transliterated adm and is not the name of a specific man. The Hebrew word אדם is not a proper name although it has been adopted as one.
Dr Adequate writes: how Peleg got his name. Peleg's name is קלג which means divide, split, cleave. So there is no comparison of your Noah and Adam to Peleg.
Dr Adequate writes: Consider also that according to your interpretation what is being referred to would be one of the most momentous, dramatic, and most cataclysmic events in the whole history of the world --- and yet is mentioned only in passing as an explanation of how Peleg got his name. I translate when I give the Hebrew word and the definition. I interpet when I decide which definition to apply to the Hebrew word in question. Which is controled by many factors. Now as to the dividing of the Earth I agree that it would be a cataclysmic event. Almost as much so as the Earth beginning to exist. For the Earth to be divided instantly would cause a lot of problems in our way of thinking as a lot of heat would be created by the moving of the plates. But that would explain how the water that is in the mantel got there. That water being enough to fill our oceans 7 times. It would also explain how the different animals got on the different continents, as well as the people. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Joseph,
IamJoseph writes: This says 'NOT ALL THE ANIMALS OF THE EARTH.' What verse in the Bible says that about the animals on the Earth at the time of the flood?
IamJoseph writes: Yet you omitted the opening verse, which is the preamble to the story: this is limited to Noah's household - not the entire planet's livestock? Hereafter, everything must align with the preamble. Please point out in the following verses any verse that leaves out any animal, especially how did this verse leave out any animal? "6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die. Does 'every' mean some or does it mean all?
quote: IamJoseph writes: Tigers did not come, Are you saying God is a liar when He said "EVERY LIVING THING" ?
IamJoseph writes: the water laden mud alone [wet earth] would require more than a year to dry out. Where did all this mud come from?
IamJoseph writes: Yes, certainly the word 'every' can apply to a small designated group. As in every member of some groups. 6:19 says "And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female." That says every living thing of all flesh. That does not leave any out. Two of every sort. That covers anything you might think got left out.
IamJoseph writes: All does not mean all flesh on the planet, but all flesh of those not taken into the boat. The regional limitations are not negated here. What dictionary do you find "ALL" means "SOME" in?
IamJoseph writes: Think thusly: all the earth of John Doe's land. The previous verses do limit the reference to earth being a portion of earth, as described in my post. Did God lie when He said: "And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die"? All flesh, wherein is the breath of life under heaven would cover any creature that lived on the dry land on planet Earth.
IamJoseph writes: In a global scenario, it would be instantanious. Here, the boat rising after 40 days can only refer to one large village or town. We saw a tsunami some years ago which stretched across continents - it was instantanious. What kind of weed is that you are smoking? A global scenario would take a lot more water than a local scenario although I don't think it took much as all the dry land was in one place as put forth in Genesis 1:9, 10. But the flood was not a tsunami. The flood was caused by rain coming down from the sky and the water coming up from the fountains of the deep. It would be something like filling your bathtub with part of the water coming out of a water hose you had put in the tub and water coming out of the shower. If the dry land was in one place as the water was in one place and the dry land was pretty close to sea level the water could rise at a slow rate and the rain could fall at a moderate rate and there would be no erosion of the dry land as it was covered with water and the ark began to rise after the water had risen close to 30 feet because of its size and load displacement.
IamJoseph writes: Its the only view possible. E.g. a 30 storey building today would be seen as medium; 4000 years ago it would be seen as reaching the heavens. But it was not written 4,000 year ago, but 3271 to 3321 years ago. That was about a 1,000 years after the flood.
IamJoseph writes: Not necessarilly. Consider, every living substance in a designated and specified area. But the text has no qualifier. Only IamJoseph has the qualifiers.
IamJoseph writes: You miss the point. It is conclusive proof not ALL life/flesh was destroyed! You went to all that trouble trying to convince me of something I have always believed. I know all living life forms did not perish in the flood. There are too many living organisms in the world today. I do know that everything other that water creatures that was not in the ark perished as that is what God said He was going to do. God said:
quote: Now either everything died or God lied. I tend to believe everything under the heaven that was not in the water or the ark died. God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICANT Member Posts: 6769 From: SSC Joined: Member Rating: 1.6 |
Hi Dr,
Dr Adequate writes: Perhaps you could expand on that. Real geologists, after all, do not hold that continental drift would draw that much water into the mantel, But we were not talking abut continental drift was we? We were talking about very rapid movement of the plates which would cause immense heat that would make a lot of water very hot. Water gets in the mantel by subduction. So if there was a lot of rapid movement and heat would not a lot of water be subducted into the mantel to cool it? God Bless,"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024