Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Occupy Wall Street

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Occupy Wall Street
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 509 of 602 (639642)
11-02-2011 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 507 by Modulous
11-02-2011 2:37 PM


Re: LITTLE RED HEN
Or alternatively: 'The horse invented a harvesting machine which increases productivity meaning either you all get to do less hard labour, or you get to the same amount of hard work while I lay off the goose meaning I don't have to share as much of MY bread around.'
And since the horse was employed by the hen when he made the invention, the hen pays the horse his normal salary but takes all of the revenue from selling the new harvesting machine herself as if she created it. Because the hen is totally the actual innovator, not the horse.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 507 by Modulous, posted 11-02-2011 2:37 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 526 of 602 (639738)
11-03-2011 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 524 by jar
11-03-2011 11:09 AM


Re: voting systems
Prison reform and single-payer healthcare are major issues for me.
Imagine that I decided to use my single-person veto to veto every bill that did not include an acceptable solution to one of those two problems? It sounds like a good idea to force my priorities to the top, right?
Now imagine someone else has a different opinion from mine. They oppose universal healthcare, and want to be "tough on crime." They veto any bill that does include either of those.
All it takes is two people, in a country of over 300 million, to completely shut down the government.
Education doesn't lead to identical opinions, jar. It doesn't lead to better consensus building, or better ability to compromise. People with similar educational backgrounds and intelligence still have differences in opinion, sometimes strongly so.
With a single-person veto, any statistically insignificant person can shut down the entire system regardless of what anyone else wants. You'd need truly 100% participation, there's no room at all for anyone at all to be stubborn.
It's just a pipe dream, jar. It's not even remotely a good idea.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 524 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 11:09 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 527 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 12:11 PM Rahvin has replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 528 of 602 (639740)
11-03-2011 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 527 by jar
11-03-2011 12:11 PM


Re: voting systems
Actually, education can lead to consensus building, in fact it is essential. Part is learning the results of NOT building a consensus.
Says you. For your little plan, you need more than "can," you need "100% always does."
I say this now, you will never get 100% of the population of the nation to agree on anything. All it takes is one idiot, one lunatic, or one person with a strongly held different opinion. One is an awfully small number. There is no amount of education (unless "education" is translated as "using one of my three wishes from that genie") that can guarantee universal buy-in for building consensus regardless of subject matter.
Yes, it may well be a pipe dream, but in the long run, I also believe it is the only hope.
The only hope? Your one solution is the only way to potentially save the political future of the nation?
I think you just proved my point yourself. All it takes is two people who believe they have the "only" solutions, and for those solutions to differ, to freeze the entire system.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 527 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 12:11 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 529 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2011 12:29 PM Rahvin has replied
 Message 531 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 12:54 PM Rahvin has replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 530 of 602 (639742)
11-03-2011 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 529 by crashfrog
11-03-2011 12:29 PM


Re: voting systems
Some men just want to watch the world burn, and jar is one of them.
I think jar's just a guy who's gotten really attached to his idea to the point where he's no longer rationally examining the real feasibility of the plan. Happens all the time, it's ironically part of the cause of the very problem his idea is intended to solve.
But impossible solutions aren't a "hope" for anything at all. They're just fantasies.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 529 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2011 12:29 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 532 of 602 (639745)
11-03-2011 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 531 by jar
11-03-2011 12:54 PM


Re: voting systems
I said it was my belief.
So? Everyone has beliefs, and some are more valid than others. This belief falls into the realm of impossibility. Are we not to criticize your belief because it's just "your opinion?"
I also said that it was a goal.
Which would be fine if simply working toward the goal would have an effect. Unfortunately, with a single-person veto, you need universal cooperation, not just majority or even super-majority. Partial success results in a deadlocked system, which means you'll never attain the goal, never receive the benefits of the system.
Finally I have not said that I wanted to impose anything on anyone.
Why would that be relevant? You don't have the ability to impose it on anyone, so your desire in that regard is rather moot either way.
You presented an idea. That idea is completely unrealistic as a system of human political government. We criticized that idea based on its very significant and obvious flaws. At what point does whether you support "imposition" of the idea come into play at all?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 531 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 12:54 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 534 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 1:28 PM Rahvin has replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 535 of 602 (639748)
11-03-2011 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 534 by jar
11-03-2011 1:28 PM


Re: voting systems
One thing I can be absolutely certain is that as long as we do not work towards that goal we will not achieve that goal.
The "you can't win if you don't play" defense?
Jar, we're not even talking about lottery odds here. The likelihood of gaining sufficient consensus to deal with a single-person veto in a nation of 300+ million on any subject, even with additional undefined "education" (hint: "education" is not a magic word that conveys additional meaning or a mechanism, you need to specify how your "education" is supposed to increase the likelihood of consensus to 100%), is practically zero.
We can't even get 300+ million people to agree that the holocaust was bad. Or that it even [i]happened.[i]
Your single-line responses don;t serve to add to your argument, jar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 534 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 1:28 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 537 by jar, posted 11-03-2011 2:49 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 541 of 602 (639761)
11-03-2011 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 540 by Dr Adequate
11-03-2011 5:42 PM


Re: voting systems
Worse.
Say we want to add a new restriction, or a new environmental regulation, or hell, even make child rape illegal.
One person can veto. So of course a couple people with incentive to avoid those new laws (say, corporations for whom a regulation may add costs, or a child rapist) just vetoes them.
How the fuck does education and "consensus building" address that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 540 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-03-2011 5:42 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


(1)
Message 546 of 602 (639781)
11-03-2011 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 545 by crashfrog
11-03-2011 7:16 PM


Re: voting systems
Nobody's complaining about the workup to such a system; it's the end-state of a consensus system that we're telling you doesn't work. It's not a matter of "oh, there'll be some growing pains but then we'll get consensus and it'll all be fine", it's a matter of "the full expression of the system, as you've outlined it, leads to the collapse of democratic society."
Seriously.
If I want to commit a crime, any crime, all I need to do is veto every spending bill that funds the police! If I want to eliminate some environmental or banking regulations, I can veto the budget bills for the EPA or banking oversight organization!
No amount of "education" is going to fix that. You need a society so perfect that you wouldn't need laws or government in the first place!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 545 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2011 7:16 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 572 of 602 (640353)
11-08-2011 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 571 by Coyote
11-08-2011 10:09 PM


Re: Democracy
Just look to Greece, Spain, and the US for examples of this.
And Germany, amirite?
Wait...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 571 by Coyote, posted 11-08-2011 10:09 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


(1)
Message 580 of 602 (640431)
11-09-2011 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 573 by Dogmafood
11-08-2011 10:19 PM


Re: Democracy
That is just fucking depressing . You may be right I don’t know. It just seems to me that people are better than that as individuals. Ignorant perhaps but with good hearts.
The intelligence of a group tends to be inversely proportional to its size.
To quote Tommy Lee Jones in Men In Black:
quote:
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.
People are intelligent enough to make good decisions when they've been given sufficient information upon which to base a decision.
Unfortunately, estimation of confidence is also inversely proportional to actual topical knowledge - the less you know about a subject, the more confident you tend to be in your competence.
This means that people who are capable of making intelligent decisions based on ample information will be perfectly willing to make decisions when they have little or no actual knowledge...virtually guaranteeing that the opinion of the average Joe on a specific topic is worth less than the oxygen used to verbalize it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 573 by Dogmafood, posted 11-08-2011 10:19 PM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 586 by Dogmafood, posted 11-10-2011 8:34 AM Rahvin has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 596 of 602 (640667)
11-11-2011 2:34 PM


Hooray for more police brutality at OWS...
I see students with linked arms taking no action at all.
Then I see cops start assaulting the students with batons.
Apparently this was an attempt to "disperse" a crowd of students who had erected tents on school property in violation of school policy. The police were there to dismantle the tents. They should have simply instructed the crowd to disperse, and then arrested them one by one until the tents had been removed.
Instead, they whipped out the batons and started beating nonviolent protesters.
I don't know about you, but when I see a bunch of cops wailing on a bunch of kids because they were standing with their arms linked, I get upset.
Edited by Rahvin, : No reason given.
Edited by Rahvin, : No reason given.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers

Replies to this message:
 Message 597 by kjsimons, posted 11-11-2011 3:09 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 599 of 602 (640675)
11-11-2011 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 598 by hooah212002
11-11-2011 3:11 PM


Re: Hooray for more police brutality at OWS...
Not even that. It's actually an accepted tactic for forcing a crowd to dissipate: beat them with sticks and force the line back until everybody goes home. Or to a hospital, whatever.
They won't face disciplinary action at all.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 598 by hooah212002, posted 11-11-2011 3:11 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 600 by Omnivorous, posted 11-11-2011 7:17 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024