|
Author
|
Topic: Evidence for a recent flood
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 126 of 404 (641250)
11-18-2011 8:05 AM
|
Reply to: Message 125 by Portillo
11-18-2011 7:51 AM
|
|
Re: Evidence for a recent flood
The only way a 15,000 pound elephant could be frozen that quick and preserve what is in its stomach is to be frozen in a freezer that is 150 degrees below zero. Nonsense. Animal dies in sub zero temperature. Biological processes stop. Digestion stops. Animal freezes solid in a few hours. Animal still has non digested matter in stomach. This happens all the time.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 125 by Portillo, posted 11-18-2011 7:51 AM | | Portillo has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 137 of 404 (641547)
11-20-2011 6:54 AM
|
Reply to: Message 136 by Portillo
11-20-2011 6:23 AM
|
|
Re: Evidence for a recent flood
In the science threads it's a place to present, and have critically appraised, evidence. The reason creos often don't last long here is because they can't stick to the rules and supply evidence.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 136 by Portillo, posted 11-20-2011 6:23 AM | | Portillo has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 143 of 404 (641873)
11-23-2011 5:39 AM
|
Reply to: Message 142 by Portillo
11-23-2011 1:36 AM
|
|
Re: Evidence for a recent flood
Well seeing how the Bible is a fable and myth, how can there be evidence for something that is false? Well, maybe all the evidence that suggest that there was an unbroken line of human civilisation during the 'Flood Time' (as Coyote has presented loads of times) was put there by Yahweh as a test of faith? Would that count as false evidence? Edited by Larni, : Spellingageing
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 142 by Portillo, posted 11-23-2011 1:36 AM | | Portillo has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Evidence for a recent flood
You have yet to demonstrate that Genesis is science. In fact it is acknowledged as magic by right minded people every where. Again, no evidence from the creo crowd.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 150 by IamJoseph, posted 11-24-2011 4:23 AM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 163 of 404 (641978)
11-24-2011 1:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 158 by IamJoseph
11-24-2011 12:14 PM
|
|
Re: CHECK MATE.
As I said: you have yet to provide any evidence for this being true. Simply you saying it does not mean you are correct. Evidence my good sir, is the Achilles heel of the creo. Every. Single. Time.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 158 by IamJoseph, posted 11-24-2011 12:14 PM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Lets take the initiative
Do you honestly think that people reading what you write actually see things the way you do? I bunked with Reed Richards in my uni days and picked up a Thing or two (full marks for the pun) and I have no idea what you are getting at. As my professor used to say "a good teacher can make herself understood easily".
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 201 by IamJoseph, posted 11-25-2011 5:44 PM | | IamJoseph has replied |
|
™ Version 4.2