Summations Only

Quotes are fine - but you need to have understood them in context.
e.g.
If I was to claim that you thought that Judaism is the only correct religion because you stated in Message 17 that "The Jewish nation in the old testament is a perfect example." then you would be correct to point out that I had misunderstood and quote-mined what you were saying.Quote-mining is wrong: it is lying.
Unfortunately web-sites like AnswerInGenesis and The Institute for Creation Research repeatedly use them.
This means that whenever they claim that "a scientist" said something - you cannot take their word for it. You need to check it is true.When they knowingly make false claims on their web-site, it tars honest believers with the same brush.Every time you use their quote-mines you are supporting their lies - you are not supporting God.
God doesn't need lies.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

When the floods started, the geysers shot water 20 miles up, which then exploded and came back down as ice-rain.Why do you think that ice-rain was able to rapidly freeze mammoths?

Wow.
Jar has posted the same questions several times and that is all you have managed to provide so far.
That took a fantastically long time for you to finally admit that you don't know.I expect it will take a further 50 posts of your bullshit before you finally respond to all the other questions with the same answer.

And yet - 15 more of your bullshit posts and you haven't either supplied a location for Mount Ararat or answered any of Jar's other questions.Your responses are as pointless and stupid as being asked "What is the time?" and replying with: "My watch is accurate!" and "My watch knows the answer!".
At no point have you even bothered to try and answer the questions.So - where is Mount Ararat?
If you know where it is, then just point to it on a map.
If you can't point to it on a map - then you don't know where it is.

*looks for a map location*
*sees only word salad*
*concludes that IamJ doesn't know where Mount Ararat is*

*looks for a map location*
*sees only more word salad*
*concludes that IamJ definitely doesn't know where Mount Ararat is*

Ok - let's work this out ...First question:
How long does it take for a fossil to form?Second question:
What is the minimum age of a fossil?Third question:
How recently could a fossilised animal have lived?Have a go at answering and then we can look at your questions again if the answers have not become apparent.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

You are NOT here for a debate - friendly or otherwise.
You have ignored all the friendly and polite answers to your questions, and instead reply to just the snarky ones.
This simply makes you look like a troll.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

What exactly isn't easy? Message 333 You asked: There were 5 replies to that message.
3 of those replies were polite and the other 2 were also polite, but showed an 'undertone' of frustration with you.But you did not post a single reply to any of those messages.
You ignored them and instead posted replies to 4 snarky messages.So what is it that you are finding difficult?
Because currently it looks like the only thing that is 'not easy' for you is debating the subject.

There were 5 replies to your Message 333.
But you did not post a single reply to any of those messages.
Instead you replied to 4 snarky messages.You clearly have no problem finding the time to reply - but you appear unable to actually debate or support your claims. You also have no intention of debating else you would have ignored the snarky posts and instead addressed the polite ones.

I would hope that it was obvious why fewer fossils are being produced in the present (1 year) than in the past (500 million years). It would help if you could tell us how many fossils do you think were produced in the past and how many are being produced now.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.