Chuck Norris writes:
It is fine if he doesn't want to answer, what the hell is it to you anyway?
And next time you call anyone narrow minded or has a confirmation bias please refer back to your argumentum ad populum comment that you just made. It's really rediculous this dudes sex life has gotten so much traction that now people like you are employing logical fallacies to expose his sex life AND taking this "debate" off the website onto the web. Hilarious! Keep up the honest debating and not minding your own freeking business about one's personal life.
This is exactly the kind of liberal commie BS that I've been arguing against all these years. There's nothing wrong with one's sex life. Exposing it? You sound like it's a bad thing to be either straight or gay.
Sure, if he doesn't want to answer it directly. What's the harm in having people vote on it?
This is like that time someone said "asian people like to eat rice" and then all the politically correct people came down on him. (1) There's nothing wrong with eating rice as a main dietary supplement. (2) It is a fact that people in east asia consume a hell of a lot more rice than anywhere else.
Here are some more statements that are morally neutral and do not at all reflect on a person's character.
I have a rather large nose.
I drive an impala.
I use a canon wifi printer.
I'm straight.
I've experimented (or tried to) with other guys before.
I ate a hell of a lot of turkey this past Thursday. Still got left overs.
I like to eat steak.
Etc.
Again, there's nothing wrong with the act of eating rice just like there's nothing wrong with one's sexuality. I don't know what other people's motives are, but there are 3 reasons why I'm poking at Rrhain. (1) Believe it or not I consider him a friend I never met, (2) at this very moment part of me want to annoy him, and (3) ....um..... uh...... I can't remember right now.... oops...
™ Version 4.2
(1)