Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,757 Year: 4,014/9,624 Month: 885/974 Week: 212/286 Day: 19/109 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   In the beginning
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2790 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 16 of 51 (64231)
11-03-2003 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by RebWlmJames
11-03-2003 5:59 PM


Re: Genesis 1.1
Very interesting Reb. I like the way the Anchor Bible and the Living Bible render it:
When God began creating ...
It is surprising how much this does to clarify the otherwise confusing narrative which follows.
db
------------------
"I was very unwilling to give up my belief." Charles Darwin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RebWlmJames, posted 11-03-2003 5:59 PM RebWlmJames has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5934 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 17 of 51 (64232)
11-03-2003 8:19 PM


It is obvious that I am not going to be able to make heads or tails of just what the bible is actually saying or not saying and whether what it is saying is or is not actual or metaphorical.My impressions of religion while growing up are hinged on the people themselves and not the particular beliefs they state they adhere to.So if the words are essentially meaningless in the sense that the purpose of language is to communicate then I shall feel no great loss at the fact the the bible is not such a great story after all but,rather, politics and power plays poorly recorded.
Thanks to those of you who sought to straighten out my sense of understanding of these verses.

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by doctrbill, posted 11-03-2003 8:44 PM sidelined has replied

  
doctrbill
Member (Idle past 2790 days)
Posts: 1174
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Joined: 01-08-2001


Message 18 of 51 (64239)
11-03-2003 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by sidelined
11-03-2003 8:19 PM


Don't give up, friend. The truth is in there. And no matter if these things are not essential to one's soul salvation, they are interesting and entertaining, at least they are to myself and others hereabouts.
I find it particularly satisfying to discover that the biblical bologna I was spoon fed in the days of my youth was not fit food for the scientific mind which is in me.
I take pleasure in debunking the doctrines of an institution which advertizes liberty, then bequeaths repression.
I cannot get enough of undermining an institution which offers hope, then bestows paranoia.
I am happy to destroy a house of cards which created in me such fear of life and love that I am forever stunted in the social graces.
I can understand why the Bible is called The Good Book, even though establishments of religion have played down the good stuff (sex and violence), and played up the bad stuff (sin and repentance).
A bit tongue in cheek I am at this point but I say these things in response to your apparent discouragement. You can't quit now my friend.
You're one of the good guys, Yes?
db
------------------
"I was very unwilling to give up my belief." Charles Darwin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by sidelined, posted 11-03-2003 8:19 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by sidelined, posted 11-03-2003 8:58 PM doctrbill has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5934 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 19 of 51 (64240)
11-03-2003 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by doctrbill
11-03-2003 8:44 PM


doctrbill
No need to worry old man, I was merely placing my opinon out there.I am not discouraged so much as puzzled over the contortionist acts played out in the interpretation of this bible.In my life it has been my observation that many of the people who most devoutly proclaim their allegience to biblical doctrine very seldom live it outside of their church.
As for discouragement I say never.I have skied in powder snow up to my teeth in the backcountry of British Columbia and a day of that much perfect enjoyment is worth a lifetime of drudgery.And I have done it dozens of times.
"Life is pleasant,death is peaceful,it's the transition that's troublesome"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by doctrbill, posted 11-03-2003 8:44 PM doctrbill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by RebWlmJames, posted 11-03-2003 11:13 PM sidelined has not replied

  
RebWlmJames
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 51 (64276)
11-03-2003 11:13 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by sidelined
11-03-2003 8:58 PM


Reading the Bible
If I may recommend a a few books that, in my opinion, help present the full poetic depth of the Bible?
Genesis: The Beginnings of Desire, by Aviva Zornberg
Genesis: The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis, by Leon Kass
God: A Biography, by Jack Miles
Reading the Bible for religion is like reading Shakespeare for philosophic anthropology (e.g., Harold Bloom). It can be done, but it requires more care and depth than most interpreters are able to muster up. Zornberg, Kass and Miles succeed.
Reb Wlm

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by sidelined, posted 11-03-2003 8:58 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Philip
Member (Idle past 4748 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 21 of 51 (64303)
11-04-2003 1:18 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by sidelined
10-08-2003 1:17 AM


Waters vs. Formless Void
There seems a great deal of latitude in these semantics, hence YECs vs. OECs
Some Christians weld this verse strait into the cross of Christ and the gospel and don't worry much about empirical meanings. That is, they metaphysically place Christ's death at the foundation of the world and therein overcome the disonant semantics of "waters" vs. "formless and void".
...Or they feel their own "baptism in the Spirit" when reading about these waters and formless void.
Thus, these scriptures to them becomes a dreadful realization of the gospel. Their world (and Christ's) as such becomes baptized and/or reborn in the creation event.
Rev 13:8 ... the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Mat 27:45 Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour. (during Christ's vicarious sufferings)
Isa 52:14 As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men.
Etc.
Another parallel is the birth process of a baby in a womb about to break forth out of the dark-water into light. The Spirit of God moved ("brooded" might be a synonym here) ... upon the face of the waters.
In sum, this all rectifies (to me) that the creation event was accurately written, but requires some small amout of faith to accept.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by sidelined, posted 10-08-2003 1:17 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by sidelined, posted 11-05-2003 1:12 AM Philip has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5934 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 22 of 51 (64495)
11-05-2003 1:12 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Philip
11-04-2003 1:18 AM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
Philip
I am sorry to say that I long ago gave up on faith and I have not yet missed it in the least.I will not submit to endless debate about ancient dusty tomes and concentrate on dealing fairly with people in my day to day and let go of concern about living up to ideals and opinions.Religious texts,IMO,rob people of listening skills and flexibilty in personal and societal realms and worst of all blinds them to the contradictions inherent in not only the texts but also in their actions.Many are good as gold in front of church members and others of a like mind but at home the one mask comes off to be replaced by another.
[This message has been edited by sidelined, 11-05-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Philip, posted 11-04-2003 1:18 AM Philip has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Prozacman, posted 11-09-2003 3:36 PM sidelined has not replied

  
Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 51 (65367)
11-09-2003 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by sidelined
11-05-2003 1:12 AM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
Just to possibly help you understand why these texts were as good-as-gold to an ex-christian fundamentalist like me, I'll share what I was taught about Genesis 1. Very simple really: "In the beginnig God created the heavens & the earth" is sort of a summary statement for what God was going to do. "The earth was without form & void..." is the beginning of a detailed description of what God was creating.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by sidelined, posted 11-05-2003 1:12 AM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Philip, posted 11-11-2003 11:13 PM Prozacman has replied

  
Philip
Member (Idle past 4748 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 24 of 51 (65942)
11-11-2003 11:13 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Prozacman
11-09-2003 3:36 PM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
On my own website here I had written much (speculation) concerning the general dilemma here (from a YEC/OEC bias), I share a little of it with you (and all you lurkers). Feel free to refute, rebut, deride, and/or de-spamatize unto the beneficience of us all. Apologies in advance for cheezy analogies, poetics, etc. To wit:
... Thus, it seems apparent that the 'stretching out' of heaven was created without any chaotic explosion at all! (More of this on the second day's discourse.)
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
...That an apparently diametrical disorder (the formlessness and void, which is NOT called good by God) is spoken of next, seems to indicate:
(1) That 'heaven and earth' came about over the next six 'days' commencing with formlessness (and perhaps timelessness, at least from many cosmological dating perspectives): Dissolute, totally dark, earthy, fluid-like, black-hole-like orbs were present before the bright light and heavenly orbs were ushered by God: yet all omnipresently at the very beginning, which seems semantically acceptable; and/or,
(2) That the earth was created and it 'BECAME' ... 'formless and void'--a physical and/or metaphysical black-hole, inert (without time, at least from many cosmological dating perspectives), possibly by an 'event' (or series of events), i.e. 'after' some sort of time (atomic, gravitational, conceptual and/or divine time--I don't know) ...a time of judgment upon sin might be construed as latent here, even the "Lamb slain from the foundation of the world" (Rev. 13.8)
Dogmatically you conclude there are no diurnal, solar, atomic, or even gravitational clocks until light 'shines forth'; time becomes null. 'When' is a word cosmologists use to denote time coming into existence--i.e., just outside a black hole or a universe. With formless void and darkness there is no 'when' within, just absolute eternal nothingness! Soberly you pray:
When Christ the mighty maker died
Engulfed by darkest depths therein,
Forever Light in darkness hides
To save a man from ALL his sin!
So why should I decline verse two
When tears of hope it ere shall bring
While earth bars bring eternal woe
They soon shall break, my prayers shall sing!
His Spirit moves to break my bands
Though deep in sin my heart hath gone;
Oh pull me Lord with both thy hands
Oh pull me to thy Holy Throne!
Oh move Thee down from Heaven's Host;
Upon earth's depths of darkness pass!
Baptizing waves and billows boast--
Thy Light shall bring me Life at last!
Yet formless void and darkness is also 'created' ('bara') by God (in Isa 45.7). Time itself would have diametrically infinite 'when's (light divided from the darkness in vs. 4) it seems. And perhaps time would be nonexistent or null until God's Spirit imparts form, order, fullness (e.g., darkness upon the 'face of the deep' becoming actuated by, through, and into God's Spirit moving upon the 'face of the waters'), and Light professed next by God, manifested a conceptual evening and morning in God's mind. I don't know precisely. Thus the primordial "evening and morning" of God's work may be interpreted as an 'embryonically created diurnal cosmological time constant, "a day with the Lord", and (as per vs. 5) comprehending ALL ages of light (day) and darkness (night), while perpetrating man's '24 hour 'pocket-watch' perception of it. Is it precisely during this 'when' that 'events' now usher forth? It seems to me that the first, second, and/or third event(s) ushering forth occur(s) as the 'Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters'.
...
The "face of the deep" seems geological enough. ...enough to allow you and I to simplistically accept the scriptures that this is indeed the 'earth'. But it is pervaded with a seemingly universal darkness of geometric and relativistic uncertainties. Otherwise it would not have been called "without form, and void". Thus the state of the earth here is subject to incomprehensible abstractions.
The 'deep' with its waters seems oceanic enough. But are these waters also pervaded with metaphysical darkness, a darkness of geometric and relativistic uncertainties? Consider Christ's surreal statement to Simon Peter: "Launch out into the DEEP"... (Luke 5:4); after preaching (in a ship) thereon. Consider David's sublime rescue: "And he made darkness pavilions round about him, dark waters, and thick clouds of the skies ...He sent from above, he took me; he drew me out of MANY WATERS; "(2 Sam 22:12-17). David's 'many waters' are 'dark' and holy, mysterious and surreal, metaphorical but very real (i.e., even 'baptismal waters' of salvation). Consider the many instances of water's spiritual, metaphorical, and/or sublime meanings of which we cannot begin to discuss without volumes of commentaries! The spiritual precedes the empirical (as does God's Word over the intellect). 'Waters' then are complex substrates of God's (created) realities in spite of our scienti-fictious deductions of the phenomenon -- deductions that are too often just formalized babblings that are 'without-form-and-void' empirically, allegorically, and spiritually.
'Waters' might hence be perceived as a 'loaded' Word (of God); H2O is just one (chemical) aspect describing our limited reality of it. 'Waters' are 'pregnant' with life on all levels, beyond mere scientific comprehension: "And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues"(Rev 17:15). "Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance...(Isa 40:15)" "And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of MANY WATERS, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth"(Rev 19:6). And finally, "living waters shall go out from Jerusalem (Zec 14:8)" ..."And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely"(Rev 22:17).
Who dogmatically states that these primordial waters then are probably just simply 'H2O' or just a sum of the creeks as you and I perceive them? Primordially, spiritually, and also in the end of time, these waters are supernatural waters of God. We may carnally and spiritually perceive water as 'wet' and such. And yet our bodies are indeed primarily water whose wetness nor mutability we do not always perceive. Ironically, the 'First' waters then were probably extremely surreal spiritual substance(s) that existed before seas and that may be perceived by 'spiritual' persons currently. God created much of the medium of the universe out of these many (DEEP) waters.
'Later', the primordial atoms themselves, hydrogen (with deuterium isotopes, etc.) quickly assimilated with oxygen the 8-protoned sphere forming the 10-protoned compound chemists refer to as water. When and how LIGHT (and/or the WORD of God) catalyzed 'chemical' water (H2O) formation seems subject to many (even vain) speculations. Catalysis of hydrogen with oxygen to form H2O does require/and/or produce light intrinsically ...in atomic, sub-atomic, and electromagnetic forms of radiation... and perhaps extrinsically in combustive, solar, and/or other energies. Moreover, when viewed quantum-ly, this kind of water, H2O cannot even exist without light ...at least inherently. The 'first waters' then were of a mysterious surreal nature to say the least ...scientifically and scripturally speaking. The reality of water then is extremely complex.
'The waters' with their extensive physical mediums of matter-energy ('heaven and earth') have noteworthy primary attributes however. They are of a sublimely 'deep' and homogenous consistency. Once created they are 'lawfully' neither created nor destroyed. They seem to have become omnipresent in the space-time continuum. They invariably are mutable and become 'without form, and void', sometimes violently so. They contain complex substrates even of life. They are perceived by you and me (although methinks spiritual water eludes from us).
Therefore, scripturally and scientifically, the primordial waters, their atoms, and all atoms (at least of the earth) either 1) became DEAD ('without form, and void'), 2) were DEAD when God created them 'in the beginning', or 3) were DEAD when as yet they were mentioned. Consider this: 'Excellence', 'beauty', 'symmetry', 'proportion', 'harmony', etc. is simply VOID in the 'SECOND' sentence. Their is no scriptural mention of 'good' on the 'first day' except as regarding 'the light' itself. This is not to assert that God is not good or that the Spirit moving upon the face of the dark waters is not good. But the scriptures seem to me to assert nothing good about the creation in the second sentence.
Were it not for the 'AND' of "AND the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters" the doleful deadness of earth would be without its diametrical comforter, life-giver, resurrector, and 'nothing' would exist.
The Spirit touched over ALL the waters, comprehended every dark dead homogeneous vacuole and the formlessness of all the earth (possibly spewed in the water as a mixture), and acted upon the medium 'in-toto' by His presence.
The Spirit was made to recount Christ's sufferings, as Christ too became "without form or comeliness" thus becoming our 'living waters'. Thus the Spirit of God clothed Himself upon His primordial elements. The Spirit no doubt 'quickened' them with intrinsic light in diametrical contrast to what the elements were so that they would no longer be as "without form, and void". Rather the heart of the earth became realized with all foundations of life. Order is acting upon the chaos. Spiritual order is awakening living substrates and organic compounds as well. Though dead as the other worlds (not yet divided out, since the firmament is yet forthcoming) the earth becomes increasingly ordered so that the earth alone supersedes all other planets in complexity.
The Spirit of God moved...with fiery glory, with groanings and travailings, with lightnings and thunderings, with sparks ascending upward, etc. as befitting a 'Holy' spirit that comprehends ALL waste and void, that willfully covers that which is NOT GOOD of itself, to elaborate on the implied sin-wreckage.
That the earth is in the form of completely evil darkness and sin-wreckage here should be dogmatically asserted and explained scripturally. 1) God divides the light from the darkness on the first day and in no wise calls the darkness good, 2) John (John 1.5) states "And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." thus animating them as powers of darkness here ...inferring all evil and the devil.; 3) 'Darkness' although loaded with meaning is never mentioned as good despite God's repeatedly using darkness to magnify His glory and to execute judgment on sin.
The surreal metaphor of "the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters" is the truth of all reality itself: Namely Christ's death burial and resurrection for our sins and our baptismal regeneration via the Holy Spirit. That the empirically awesome creation becomes merely a metaphor of redemption seems credible since this creation will pass away once the new heaven and earth appear (Rev. 21). Moreover the sea as we know it--perhaps all H2O and all molecules as we presently know them--will also dissapear in that day.
Thus the elements of our Baptismal Creation are metaphysically, metaphorically, and mystically set forth "in the beginning"--a Baptism wherein our space-time continuum truly subsides. God's thoughts then have become our 'hard-core' creation-environment.
Taste and Swallow my death Oh Lord;
Move over my deep troubled soul.
Though I be "without form, and void"
Help me when I am gray and old.
Not without LIGHT can there be matter-energy mediums like H2O as we now perceive them. Thus Einstein's (ad hoc) "repulsion principle" -- which he used to explain offsets of gravity during the so-called 'Big bang' -- can not explain the entropy of primordial creation here. Neither can gravity itself correct for the disordering of elements left to themselves without electromagnetic and nuclear radiation (light). The incomprehensible primordial and/or spiritual light alone actuates matter-energy mediums as we now perceive them. Withdraw that LIGHT (Christ) and dissolution, even our utter annihilation, is immediate.
3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Prozacman, posted 11-09-2003 3:36 PM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Prozacman, posted 11-12-2003 8:32 AM Philip has replied

  
Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 51 (66017)
11-12-2003 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Philip
11-11-2003 11:13 PM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
I'll have to copy what you have written on paper so I can sit on my couch for days on end trying to understand it all! What do members think of the interpretation that I was given during the time I was a fundam. christian?: The idea that Genesis 1:1 is a summary statement of all that comes after it:
In the beginning God created the heavens & the earth.(And here is how it was done.): The earth was without form & void, and darkness... Got it? Anyone??
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 11-12-2003]
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 11-12-2003]
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 11-12-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Philip, posted 11-11-2003 11:13 PM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Philip, posted 11-12-2003 2:14 PM Prozacman has replied

  
Philip
Member (Idle past 4748 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 26 of 51 (66060)
11-12-2003 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Prozacman
11-12-2003 8:32 AM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
Many fundies do follow your interpretation that Gen 1:1-2 is a summary for what follows, this is usually YEC.
2 general speculations however divide the fundie camp: YEC and/or OEC.
In many ways it can get so poetic and surreal (as you've seen with me) that the loopy (metaphysical) fundies (like myself) go off into all kinds of random speculations and hypotheses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Prozacman, posted 11-12-2003 8:32 AM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 11-12-2003 2:27 PM Philip has not replied
 Message 30 by Prozacman, posted 11-13-2003 10:49 AM Philip has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 27 of 51 (66063)
11-12-2003 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Philip
11-12-2003 2:14 PM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
And somewhat (or even very) wild speculations are an interesting way to open up lines of thought that may be fruitful research areas. However, they do have to be brought into line by much more hard nosed logic and evidence before they get too carried away.
There is a balance to be struck between what is possible at any time and what is too unimaginative in breaking new ground.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Philip, posted 11-12-2003 2:14 PM Philip has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Prozacman, posted 11-13-2003 10:23 AM NosyNed has replied

  
Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 51 (66240)
11-13-2003 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed
11-12-2003 2:27 PM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
Phillip's statements certainly got carried away. I'm still trying to make some sense of of his speculation with some hard-nosed logic. Good luck trying, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 11-12-2003 2:27 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by NosyNed, posted 11-13-2003 10:39 AM Prozacman has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 29 of 51 (66243)
11-13-2003 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Prozacman
11-13-2003 10:23 AM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
Sometimes there is no valuable content in a mess of almost random words. You have to make your own judgement about that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Prozacman, posted 11-13-2003 10:23 AM Prozacman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Prozacman, posted 11-13-2003 10:53 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Prozacman
Inactive Member


Message 30 of 51 (66245)
11-13-2003 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by Philip
11-12-2003 2:14 PM


Re: Waters vs. Formless Void
That is no longer my interpretation of Gen.1-2 though. I was once a fundee YEC and I gotta tell you, it was kind of fun going off on loopy, and random speculations about what the Bible meant by what it said; especially if I was trying to tie Bible passages together to meld with my theolgy. However, these days I prefer historical, and scientific evidence when studying the writings of people who lived 2 to 3000 years ago. The Bible is already poetic and metaporical enough don't you think? And if we are going to believe what the Bible says, as if our "eternal souls" depended on it, then we have to make more assumptions to back up the interpretations that we make when reading it, don't you think?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Philip, posted 11-12-2003 2:14 PM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Philip, posted 11-13-2003 8:23 PM Prozacman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024