Question Evolution!

Hello!My name is Jimmy Stephens and I am very excited to be a part of Christian Ministries International's new grass roots movement, Question Evolution! It is a bold campaign seeking to rid our schools, media, and politics of evolutionist indoctrination and spread the 15 questions which evolutionists can not adequately answer. Hopefully, you too will join CMI's campaign to refute the falsehoods of evolution. Please found out more at creation.com/question-evolution and discover the promising efforts against the pseudoscience of evolution.Also, please check out the Question Evolution! blog and keep up-to-date about the creation versus evolution debate, the Question Evolution! movement, and the lies of evolution.

This irrelevant insult has little standing point, even as difficult as EvC's e-mail system is to operate. I herein disregard it. Notwithstanding, I do have a very important response: quit arguing here!If you want a debate, contact the blog I mentioned: Question evolution - creation.comNow, I would also like to apologize as I misrepresented my cause. I had meant Creation Ministries International (CMI), not "Christian" Ministries International. That was a bad typographical error, and I apologize.I do not plan to twiddle long in this thread since I already pointed to my reference. However, I will bring up the major issue with evolution. The ultimate crux of evolution is its illogical standing - Darwinian natural selection.Natural Selection is a classic circulum in probando (the child of the petitio principii) wherein the claim of science is used as scientific evidence for itself; it is thus known, colloquially, as begging the question. Natural Selection is described in a few different patterns of the petitio principii but the most recent monster of nonsense is that fitness is found within the genes of those who survive (go on to reproduce). This is openly justified, with acceptance from evolutionist biologists, by the fact that those who survive vindicate fit genes.Let us review:
A. Fitness is the circumstance of containing genes from those who have survived.
B. Survival is reproducing (implying lack of death) to spread fitness.
Now, Natural Selection:
1. The fittest are those who inherent fit genes from previously surviving individuals (i.e. those who reproduce and propagate fitness).
2. Surviving individuals are those who are fittest; that is, survival indicates fitness.
Laughable...Now, of course, some pedantic pedant will reply with pseudoscientific pish posh by rephrasing the argument of Natural Selection which will undoubtedly alter its standing in semantics but will only further spruce up the fallacy. I have no time for such idiocy; Evolution is hereby debunked because it rests upon the atrocious fallacy of Natural Selection.Natural Selection does NOT exist. It is an illogicality and that word itself denotes nothing. Illogical things are not things, it is lack thereof. Logic IS reality. Too bad biologists are into fairy tails built on nothing.Edited by Anel Vadren, : No reason given.