Look "intent" is not established it is DETECTED!!! I have however ESTABLISHED that one of the best ways to "detect" intent is to look for specificity.
How?
Furthermore I have very well defined what I mean by specificity and given several real life scenarios in which real scientists use-- looking for specificity (rather that is the actual word they call it or not) to detect intelligence.
No.
I have pointed out that many working biologists describe the code in DNA as being very specified.
No.
To clarify, you may have pointed it out, but it isn't true.
Therefore, devoid of any other observations, the most logical conclusion based on observation is that it came from an intelligent source.
But we
have other observations.
Actual observations, not just stuff you've made up.