Evidence to expect given a designer

You're confusing things wearing out with the measurement we use to gauge the rate of that change. Your question is a little like suggesting that I am claiming that before they invented feet or meters, that the moon touched the earth. Our bodies wearing out is no more a result of time than the distance to the moon is a result of the metric system. That is correct. Therefore change existed long before humans. But the entire construct of the increments we use (and call time) did not exist. We are so proud of our units of time that we have become completely intrenched in them to the point that we even consider them to be literal as if they are a place to be traveled to. We have forgotten that they are merely man made increments to measure the rate at which things change. We can not travel to the "place" of 1955 (as in the moving Back to the Future) because 1955 is not a place it is only a chalk mark on the wall to remember the way things were.

Yes and I said nothing about the change of the state of things, I said that time is merely man's invention to measure the rate of this change. Again this idea is easily testable with the mind experiment of decreasing the rate of change in the entire universe to zero. At that point we would say that "time" had stopped, when in reality only change had stopped.

Oh it was? My bad... Now if you will just be so kind as to point out to me who it was that was there to observe the process of evolution and know they are the same... I would greatly appreciate it.

But what we have observed... is a state of "time" and a state of "something." We do not logically need to reject the state of infinite time on the same basis as the concept of something from nothing. That is because our invention of the measure of time is mathematically limitless in both directions. If we eliminate the notion of time being a tangible thing (please note my comments to panda in this regard) then all we are really left with is the question of where did the changeable matter, and the space within it to change... come from? If our observations say that something is required in order for something to be, then the only logical conclusion is that something has always been in order for something to now be.It is not necessary to have observed something for an infinite amount of time in order to arrive at this logical conclusion.