How did the Aborigines get to Australia?

Hello Chuck77 To me it is a terrible stretch of the imagination because. You are proposing a flood reaping massive damage to geological structures. So much so that it erases every scrap of their existence. Yet at the same time allows them to be in place for the marsupials to utilize in their migration to Australia after the flood subsides. So which is it? Were the land bridges left intact for the marsupials to use or were they washed away by the process of the flood? And if they were there to use than why do we not see any evidence of their existence in a post flood world?

So they stayed intact long enough for the marsupials to make a journey of thousands of miles, with no food and then suddenly disappeared with no evidence of their existence after they made it safely to Australia? And nowhere in that hypothesis does it mention that this land was connected anywhere close to 5,000 years ago. Any scrap of evidence that you could produce that shows how the continents could have possibly moved from a single land mass to their current positions in the time you advocate would do. Or how a planet that had been previously decimated by a yearlong flood could support the resources needed for the migration of thousands of animals to their current locations? Or how continents moving at the speed you propose wouldn't generate enough heat to boil every living thing on the face of the Earth? In fact I would be happy to finally read just one piece of evidence in support of creationism instead of just assertions.