Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9208 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,430 Year: 6,687/9,624 Month: 27/238 Week: 27/22 Day: 0/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2357 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 466 of 683 (648616)
01-17-2012 12:59 AM


Dawn has lost it
Dawn, in his "summation" has totally lost it.
Message 357
Don't care if it is in the Coffee House, this type of post gives everyone associated a bad name.
It is incomprehensible, and that's its only good feature. The rest goes downhill from there.
Edited by Coyote, : Add title

Replies to this message:
 Message 467 by Larni, posted 01-17-2012 4:31 AM Coyote has not replied
 Message 468 by Trixie, posted 01-17-2012 7:09 AM Coyote has not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 467 of 683 (648625)
01-17-2012 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 466 by Coyote
01-17-2012 12:59 AM


Re: Dawn has lost it
I fully concur.
On top of it's incomprehensible nature it repeatedly misrepresents what people say and ignores points repeatedly put forwards.
It's really hard to keep one's patience with her.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 466 by Coyote, posted 01-17-2012 12:59 AM Coyote has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3956 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 468 of 683 (648630)
01-17-2012 7:09 AM
Reply to: Message 466 by Coyote
01-17-2012 12:59 AM


Re: Dawn has lost it
I have to concur with the concurrence. It's not so much of a summary as an attack on other posters and a complete misrepresentation of what they said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 466 by Coyote, posted 01-17-2012 12:59 AM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 469 by Admin, posted 01-17-2012 8:34 AM Trixie has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13107
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 469 of 683 (648637)
01-17-2012 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 468 by Trixie
01-17-2012 7:09 AM


To Coyote, Larni and Trixie
Thank you for bringing this to moderator attention. It is no surprise that Dawn is as uncomprehending and incomprehensible as ever.
Moderator concerns about Dawn are primarily that his participation might cause threads to descend into anarchy and confusion. But as this is a Coffee House thread, and as it is his last post to the thread since it's in summation mode, I see no need for any action. Please trust that if anyone were to begin posting in such a way to one of the science threads that they would be asked to improve their conformance to the Forum Guidelines or cease posting.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 468 by Trixie, posted 01-17-2012 7:09 AM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 470 by Larni, posted 01-17-2012 8:59 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Larni
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 470 of 683 (648638)
01-17-2012 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 469 by Admin
01-17-2012 8:34 AM


Re: To Coyote, Larni and Trixie
I forgot it was Coffee House.
Point taken.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 469 by Admin, posted 01-17-2012 8:34 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 471 of 683 (648963)
01-19-2012 2:34 PM


Re: AdminModulous: Message 414
AdminModulous edited a pertinent portion of Message 414 from view. What was edited out can be seen by clicking the peek button of that message.
The problem with editing a portion of the pertinent point of my message out is that what was left would leave the impression that I was blaming Admin alone for slowing the progress of threads.
I also stated this so as to inform several responders why I did not respond to their individual messages, clicking the acknowledge button instead. My message was intended as a conclusive statement so as to, hopefully, put the matter to rest.
quote:
One size fits all, so far as the above responses.
I cited the reason for the message as follows.
quote:
I never claimed that I won any of the debates cited. My alluding to them was to show Dr Jones, who alleged my arrogant ignorance, that I was intelligent enough to keep the interest in the pack of educated science buffs for lengthy threads.
My point was that I was intelligent enough to post enough supportive evidence for robust, interesting and informative debates throughout long debates.
Finally, I cited both the trolls and Admin's actions for slowing the progress.
quote:
It was the likes of Jones et al trolls that required respones etc that slowed any forward movement in those debates.
Admin himself, ............
I hope this will not derail this thread by further discussion from members on that topic. AdminModulous PMed that I could air my problem here when I PMed a complaint to him.

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by PaulK, posted 01-19-2012 2:55 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 473 by nwr, posted 01-19-2012 3:21 PM Buzsaw has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17909
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 472 of 683 (648969)
01-19-2012 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 471 by Buzsaw
01-19-2012 2:34 PM


Re: AdminModulous: Message 414
Let it be noted that this was part of a general decision that the merits of your posts was not on topic. A number of messages were edited, including the messages you were acknowledging.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 471 by Buzsaw, posted 01-19-2012 2:34 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6484
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 8.6


Message 473 of 683 (648973)
01-19-2012 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 471 by Buzsaw
01-19-2012 2:34 PM


Re: AdminModulous: Message 414
AdminModulous edited a pertinent portion of Message 414 from view. What was edited out can be seen by clicking the peek button of that message.
I'm a bit puzzled that there was moderation in Free For All.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 471 by Buzsaw, posted 01-19-2012 2:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 474 by Huntard, posted 01-19-2012 3:42 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2546 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


(2)
Message 474 of 683 (648977)
01-19-2012 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 473 by nwr
01-19-2012 3:21 PM


Re: AdminModulous: Message 414
nwr writes:
I'm a bit puzzled that there was moderation in Free For All.
Shouldn't even free for all threads have a modest semblance of being on topic? What's the point of topics in free for all if they don't need to be on topic anyway? You could start a topic on swimming pools, and everybody would be talking about toasters. Wouldn't make any sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 473 by nwr, posted 01-19-2012 3:21 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2546 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 475 of 683 (649301)
01-22-2012 9:59 AM


Problem with notifications
Ever since my exit out of lurking mode, it seems that I no longer receive any e-mail notifications of when people reply to my messages. I've got the option checked in my profile.

Replies to this message:
 Message 476 by AdminModulous, posted 01-22-2012 11:45 AM Huntard has replied

AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 235 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 476 of 683 (649308)
01-22-2012 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 475 by Huntard
01-22-2012 9:59 AM


Re: Problem with notifications
I know it may well sound daft, but you are checking the right email aren't you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 475 by Huntard, posted 01-22-2012 9:59 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 477 by Huntard, posted 01-22-2012 11:58 AM AdminModulous has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2546 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 477 of 683 (649311)
01-22-2012 11:58 AM
Reply to: Message 476 by AdminModulous
01-22-2012 11:45 AM


Re: Problem with notifications
Yes, I've got push email on both my email accounts on my phone and tablet, and yet, I never get an email from this site. I used to before my lurker period, and I didn't change anything in my profile when I went into lurking and not now, when I'm participating again. So I've got no idea what could be wrong. Didn't get an email from your reply either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 476 by AdminModulous, posted 01-22-2012 11:45 AM AdminModulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 478 by AdminModulous, posted 01-22-2012 12:44 PM Huntard has replied

AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 235 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 478 of 683 (649317)
01-22-2012 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 477 by Huntard
01-22-2012 11:58 AM


Re: Problem with notifications
I believe your registered email can be accessed via the web. Have you checked your account there? I'm just thinking that maybe a spam filter is catching it at some point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 477 by Huntard, posted 01-22-2012 11:58 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 479 by Huntard, posted 01-22-2012 12:51 PM AdminModulous has seen this message but not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2546 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 479 of 683 (649318)
01-22-2012 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 478 by AdminModulous
01-22-2012 12:44 PM


Re: Problem with notifications
Well whaddaya know, they were being captured by some sort of spam filter seemingly implemented without my consent. Fucking Microsoft.
Anyway, thanks mate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 478 by AdminModulous, posted 01-22-2012 12:44 PM AdminModulous has seen this message but not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3708 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 480 of 683 (652444)
02-13-2012 6:39 PM


Panda Cries Deceipt
Panda comes in at Message 55
Cries deceit at Message 75 and Message 83
That's pretty much my standard argument concerning omnipotence since I've been a member.
Killed the discussion. Need a call on whether the cry is justified.
Thanks
Edited by purpledawn, : No reason given.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024