Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Irrefutable Public Health Care Thread
Taq
Member
Posts: 10044
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 121 of 314 (649931)
01-26-2012 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by Tangle
01-26-2012 2:23 PM


Re: Staying on topic
i think that is generally correct, but here in the UK we do get regualr debates about whether a heavy smoker should receive treatment for a smoking related illness if they refuse to stop smoking, or receive a liver transplant if they carry on drinking. Fair and difficult questions.
It is certainly an important debate to have, if not for the simple idea that it will bring the correct ethical position to the forefront.
The problem is that the doctor gets stuck in the middle. If I understand the Hippocratic Oath properly, a doctor has sworn to withhold moral judgements and treat an illness for the good of the patient. A doctor is NOT supposed to judge a person, and then withhold treatment if they find that patient wonting. It goes against everything a doctor should believe. Even more, how can a doctor willingly participate in a system that violates the very oath they have taken?
ABE: There is also the idea that we should not ask doctors to do something that we would not be willing to do. Could you sit in front of a family and tell them that their dad is not going to get a potentially life saving treatment because you think he will take to drink after the surgery? I couldn't do it. No way. I would treat them. They are people, just like us. They want to live just as much as any of us do.
Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Tangle, posted 01-26-2012 2:23 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Tangle, posted 01-26-2012 5:09 PM Taq has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 122 of 314 (649932)
01-26-2012 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Jon
01-26-2012 2:46 PM


Re: I can't make this stuff up
The issue is about what is best as a society, and as a society, it is best to take care of those in need.
Well isn't that rich, you can stuff your face for years and not do an ounce of exercise then they get to call themselves a "person in need."
This is because while spending the better part of an afternoon on a dialysis machine, Ms. Deen was so fortunate enough as to come across the cure for cancerand she didn't just read it off the doctor's notebook which he absentmindedly left sit at her chair-side either. And to think, our luck! Only a week ago she was at death's door until the passage of Universal Health Care Reform that made her fat ass eligible for treatment for her diabetes and so prolonged her life to make that astonishing discovery.
I'm think this is a joke.
Really, though, the number one resource of any nation is its people, young, old, handicapped, and fit.
Young, yes. Fit, definitely. Old and handycapped? I don't think so. Unless it's someone like Mr. LaLanne or the guys who play murderball.
Any nation that wishes to succeed best take care of this resource.
It's not the nations job to keep the food out of our mouth and make sure we exercise.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Jon, posted 01-26-2012 2:46 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Jon, posted 01-26-2012 5:33 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 123 of 314 (649934)
01-26-2012 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Taq
01-26-2012 3:18 PM


Re: Staying on topic
We are talking about socialized health care where it is paid by taxes that the chubbies pay at the same rate as the skinnies.
Fine if you want to get into semantics.
The fact is, even if the fatties get to work, which most don't and that's a fact, they will still be a bigger burden on the state because of their unhealthy lifestyle. And they don't deserve it. They're killing themselves, why should we care if they don't care for themselves?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Taq, posted 01-26-2012 3:18 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Taq, posted 01-26-2012 4:46 PM onifre has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 124 of 314 (649937)
01-26-2012 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by onifre
01-26-2012 9:22 AM


Re: Insurance IS Communism!!!
With Mod's plea for topicality in mind.....
Can you explain why the US, lacking public nationalised healthcare, suffers from all of the obesity and self-inflicted health problems you keep citing whilst Scandanavian countries, with their generous and all-encompassing state healthcare programmes, do not?
Are Americans fat unhealthy layabouts because they don't have nationalised health insurance in place?
Would socialised healthcare improve on the problems you cite rather than exacerbate them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 9:22 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 4:09 PM Straggler has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 125 of 314 (649941)
01-26-2012 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Straggler
01-26-2012 3:49 PM


Re: Insurance IS Communism!!!
Can you explain why the US, lacking public nationalised healthcare, suffers from all of the obesity and self-inflicted health problems you keep citing whilst Scandanavian countries, with their generous and all-encompassing state healthcare programmes, do not?
High calorie diets, lots of fast food and candy, zero exercise, lots of tv time.
There are ZERO fast food places in the entire country of Scandinavia. Thus they are healthier.
Are Americans fat unhealthy layabouts because they don't have nationalised health insurance in place?
No absolutely not. They are unhealthy layabouts (or slobs if you will) because they eat very very poorly. I will admit to once during my unenlightened days going to Mc Donalds. I can tell you that I didn't want to move after that meal. And, since most Americans eat fast food for all 3 main meals of the day, is there any wonder why we're unhealthy fatty fat fats?
Would socialised healthcare improve on the problems you cite rather than exacerbate them?
No. Closing one Mc Donalds per week will get you better results.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Straggler, posted 01-26-2012 3:49 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by Theodoric, posted 01-26-2012 8:46 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 134 by Straggler, posted 01-27-2012 5:39 AM onifre has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10044
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 126 of 314 (649945)
01-26-2012 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by onifre
01-26-2012 3:36 PM


Re: Staying on topic
They're killing themselves, why should we care if they don't care for themselves?
Because it is the moral and ethical thing to do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 3:36 PM onifre has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 127 of 314 (649952)
01-26-2012 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Taq
01-26-2012 3:29 PM


Re: Staying on topic
Taq writes:
The problem is that the doctor gets stuck in the middle. If I understand the Hippocratic Oath properly, a doctor has sworn to withhold moral judgements and treat an illness for the good of the patient. A doctor is NOT supposed to judge a person, and then withhold treatment if they find that patient wonting. It goes against everything a doctor should believe. Even more, how can a doctor willingly participate in a system that violates the very oath they have taken?
In a world of perfectly matched supply and demand, there would be less to argue about. However, if there are two patients requiring a heart transplant, but only one heart. One is a smoker who refuses to give up whilst the other is a smoker that already has, a choice has to be made. In these cases, doctors are forced to make not so much moral decisions but clinical and economic decisions - providing the optimised good.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Taq, posted 01-26-2012 3:29 PM Taq has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 314 (649958)
01-26-2012 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by onifre
01-26-2012 3:31 PM


Re: I can't make this stuff up
It's not the nations job to keep the food out of our mouth and make sure we exercise.
No, but it's in the nation's best interest to do so.
Well isn't that rich, you can stuff your face for years and not do an ounce of exercise then they get to call themselves a "person in need."
I didn't call them 'persons', so your objection is baseless.
I'm think this is a joke.
Meant to illustrate the importance of each individual to the collective prosperity.
Jon

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 3:31 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by onifre, posted 01-27-2012 6:38 AM Jon has replied

  
Shield
Member (Idle past 2884 days)
Posts: 482
Joined: 01-29-2008


Message 129 of 314 (649977)
01-26-2012 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by onifre
01-26-2012 2:27 AM


Re: We don't need public healthcare
Im not fat, im in my twenties, i eat well and i exercise.
For the past year i have lived on the the fifth floor, stairs, no elevator.
Before that, i lived on the fourth floor for 4 years, stairs, no elevator.
Im not fat, im not old, im the stairmaster. So how would a low carb diet have prevented my incidents?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 2:27 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Perdition, posted 01-26-2012 6:54 PM Shield has seen this message but not replied
 Message 136 by onifre, posted 01-27-2012 6:41 AM Shield has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 130 of 314 (649979)
01-26-2012 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Shield
01-26-2012 6:47 PM


Re: We don't need public healthcare
So how would a low carb diet have prevented my incidents?
Obviously, a bad diet makes your inner ear "fat" even if the rest of your body isn't. If your inner ear were "skinnier" you wouldn't fall.
/"dark" Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Shield, posted 01-26-2012 6:47 PM Shield has seen this message but not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9143
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 131 of 314 (649986)
01-26-2012 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by onifre
01-26-2012 11:29 AM


Re: I can't make this stuff up
Should this person get free healthcare?
Universal healthcare is not free healthcare.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 11:29 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by onifre, posted 01-27-2012 6:49 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9143
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


(1)
Message 132 of 314 (649987)
01-26-2012 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by onifre
01-26-2012 4:09 PM


Re: Insurance IS Communism!!!
There are ZERO fast food places in the entire country of Scandinavia.
Oni has definitely been hacked or he is pulling huge mind game. The Oni I know and could have loved would never make the mistake of calling Scandinavia a country. The statement in a sense is true because Scandinavia is not a country.
Sweden
quote:
On the fast food side, pizza and hot dogs have been a ubiquitous part of Swedish culture since the 1960s.
Swedish cuisine - Wikipedia
There are McDonalds in all of the Scandinavian Countries.
Sweden 230
Norway 68
Denmark 83
Source
Oni would never be this sloppy.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 4:09 PM onifre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by saab93f, posted 01-27-2012 1:55 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
saab93f
Member (Idle past 1416 days)
Posts: 265
From: Finland
Joined: 12-17-2009


(1)
Message 133 of 314 (650005)
01-27-2012 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by Theodoric
01-26-2012 8:46 PM


Re: Insurance IS Communism!!!
"Oni has definitely been hacked or he is pulling huge mind game. The Oni I know and could have loved would never make the mistake of calling Scandinavia a country. The statement in a sense is true because Scandinavia is not a country."
Then again Ms Palin referred to Africa as a country so no biggie I guess
Those blanket statements are hazardous to begin with. We in Finland have 93 McDonalds plus other chains so availability is not an issue.
What I would like to point out are the childens healthcare clinics:
Maternity and children’s clinics serve families expecting babies and those with children under school age. The clinics follow the progress of pregnancies, the health of mothers and unborn babies and the growth and development of the children. It is also the duty of clinics to prevent illnesses, detect them in their early stages, promote family well-being and support parenthood.
The idea behind that is that by pro-active measures health and well-being can be promoted and corrected if necessary. And since regular checks become a norm from early age, it is easier to continue them throughout your life.
Status - Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
I am strongly in favor of universal free healthcare - when a person need not worry whether his/her falling ill will destroy familys economics, a person can concentrate on work or studies better.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by Theodoric, posted 01-26-2012 8:46 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 134 of 314 (650024)
01-27-2012 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 125 by onifre
01-26-2012 4:09 PM


Fat Tax
Straggler writes:
Can you explain why the US, lacking public nationalised healthcare, suffers from all of the obesity and self-inflicted health problems you keep citing whilst Scandanavian countries, with their generous and all-encompassing state healthcare programmes, do not?
Dark Oni writes:
High calorie diets, lots of fast food and candy, zero exercise, lots of tv time. There are ZERO fast food places in the entire country of Scandinavia. Thus they are healthier.
The parody continues....
But on a serious note - The easiest way for private insurers to reduce costs seems to be to find loopholes in coverage so that they don't have to payout even when people get ill. In a universal healthcare system this isn't an option. So prevention becomes a better way to reduce costs. The Scandanavian system seems very good on prevention.
Dark Oni writes:
And, since most Americans eat fast food for all 3 main meals of the day, is there any wonder why we're unhealthy fatty fat fats?
I see. Your answer to America's health problems isn't to provide a nationalised health service but is to instead provide a nationalised health-food and gym chain? Free salads, riveta and soy milk distributed to all and a chain of nationalised gyms free at the point of entry
I like your thinking......
Dark Oni writes:
Closing one Mc Donalds per week will get you better results.
Or you could tax unhealthy food in the same sort of way we tax cigarettes. It might deter people. And if it doesn't at least the costs of any medical treatment they might need have been covered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by onifre, posted 01-26-2012 4:09 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by onifre, posted 01-27-2012 7:22 AM Straggler has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 135 of 314 (650027)
01-27-2012 6:38 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by Jon
01-26-2012 5:33 PM


Re: I can't make this stuff up
No, but it's in the nation's best interest to do so.
What's "the nation"? Me? You? The government?
You want government, or me, getting involved in what you feed yourself?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Jon, posted 01-26-2012 5:33 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Jon, posted 01-27-2012 9:44 AM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024