Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When does human life begin?
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 286 of 327 (651189)
02-05-2012 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 285 by bluegenes
02-04-2012 4:08 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
bluegenes writes:
I'd say very broadly speaking that we should try to avoid killing sentient people. That is persons with personalities. I don't think abortions can technically be performed on such things.
Just so I am clear, can a human being be sentient while in the womb?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 285 by bluegenes, posted 02-04-2012 4:08 PM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by jar, posted 02-05-2012 11:12 AM shadow71 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 288 by bluegenes, posted 02-05-2012 11:18 AM shadow71 has replied
 Message 289 by Coragyps, posted 02-05-2012 11:41 AM shadow71 has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 287 of 327 (651191)
02-05-2012 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by shadow71
02-05-2012 10:56 AM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
As with most every other part of this thread, there is no right answer to that question without first really defining which meaning you are applying to the term "sentient".
Like life itself, sentience is a spectrum. There are things that are clearly sentient and other things that are clearly not sentient and in between a broad spectrum of types and ranges of things that are kinda sentient and kinda not sentient.
If a fetus (not yet a human) in the womb has a developed brain and nervous system (somewhere around the third trimester) it may exhibit some of the looser definitions of sentience, but certainly not full human sentience.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 10:56 AM shadow71 has seen this message but not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2498 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 288 of 327 (651192)
02-05-2012 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by shadow71
02-05-2012 10:56 AM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
shadow71 writes:
Just so I am clear, can a human being be sentient while in the womb?
That question might trigger a long discussion on the meaning of sentient. You might be able to put forward an argument for the later stages of development by some definitions if you want to try.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 10:56 AM shadow71 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 290 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 1:17 PM bluegenes has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 289 of 327 (651195)
02-05-2012 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by shadow71
02-05-2012 10:56 AM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
Just so I am clear, can a human being be sentient while in the womb?
I don't know. Can a two-day-old anencephalic baby be sentient with no forebrain?
Anencephaly - Wikipedia, if you aren't squeamish.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 10:56 AM shadow71 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 298 by shadow71, posted 02-06-2012 2:01 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 290 of 327 (651199)
02-05-2012 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 288 by bluegenes
02-05-2012 11:18 AM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
bluegenes writes:
I'd say very broadly speaking that we should try to avoid killing sentient people. That is persons with personalities. I don't think abortions can technically be performed on such things.
bluegenes writes:
That question might trigger a long discussion on the meaning of sentient.
How do you define sentient as written in your post above?
Would your definition include a fetus in the womb?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by bluegenes, posted 02-05-2012 11:18 AM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by bluegenes, posted 02-05-2012 1:32 PM shadow71 has seen this message but not replied
 Message 292 by Theodoric, posted 02-05-2012 2:55 PM shadow71 has replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2498 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 291 of 327 (651203)
02-05-2012 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by shadow71
02-05-2012 1:17 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
shadow71 writes:
How do you define sentient as written in your post above?
Would your definition include a fetus in the womb?
Actually, it's a bit redundant there, because I couple it with people, and emphasise that these are persons with personalities. So no, I wasn't talking about a fetus in the womb.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 1:17 PM shadow71 has seen this message but not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9142
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 292 of 327 (651205)
02-05-2012 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by shadow71
02-05-2012 1:17 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
You brought up sentient. You provide the definition you mean.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 1:17 PM shadow71 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 3:17 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 293 of 327 (651209)
02-05-2012 3:17 PM
Reply to: Message 292 by Theodoric
02-05-2012 2:55 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
bluegenes writes:
I'd say very broadly speaking that we should try to avoid killing sentient people. That is persons with personalities. I don't think abortions can technically be performed on such things.
Theodoric writes:
You brought up sentient. You provide the definition you mean.
Look at bluegene's post above. That was the first time sentient was mentioned. I then merely asked him to define what he meant by the term.
Besides, what is the problem?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by Theodoric, posted 02-05-2012 2:55 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by Kairyu, posted 02-05-2012 5:50 PM shadow71 has replied

  
Kairyu
Member
Posts: 162
From: netherlands
Joined: 06-23-2010


Message 294 of 327 (651217)
02-05-2012 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by shadow71
02-05-2012 3:17 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
I presume he doesn't define something a full person until it gains sentience. Which is why he brought that birth defect in which baby's don't develop a brain up, since they never gain true sentience, at least not in a biological manner.
This tread seems to be in a bit of a slump. Several critical points have been made in regard to life and personhood. The zygote soul problem, sentience, and some parring about definitions. Can you make any conclusions with the discussed matter Shadow? In which phase do you define personhood and sentience? And if the soul is part of the answers, the problem of the zygote death rate arises once again. Or do you solely base your stance against abortion on the fact a zygote may develop into a human.
It's a complex matter.. I must admit it's hard to keep track of it, especially since the question dualism also remains a important factor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by shadow71, posted 02-05-2012 3:17 PM shadow71 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by jar, posted 02-05-2012 6:36 PM Kairyu has not replied
 Message 297 by Taz, posted 02-06-2012 9:51 AM Kairyu has not replied
 Message 300 by shadow71, posted 02-06-2012 2:23 PM Kairyu has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 295 of 327 (651220)
02-05-2012 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by Kairyu
02-05-2012 5:50 PM


"soul" should be irrelevant and thus excluded.
Well, I think anything related to some "soul" is utterly irrelevant. The existence of some "soul" can never be more than a religious position and a religious position or belief should never be a basis for either general moral decisions or law.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Kairyu, posted 02-05-2012 5:50 PM Kairyu has not replied

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 2498 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 296 of 327 (651256)
02-06-2012 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 281 by bluegenes
02-03-2012 5:41 PM


Calling Jon: don't be shy; you can reply.
Jon writes:
bluegenes writes:
Good. So, we can agree that because something is in the process of transforming into something else, it is not that something else until the transformation has taken place. And that applies when the transformation is inevitable.
So why, when the (far from inevitable) transformation of a zygote into a newborn baby has not taken place, should we regard a mindless single cell as a person?
"Jeer"
Jon, were you too short of time to reply to this post and enlighten us as to why you think it's particularly bad? Is it the claim in the first paragraph that you disagree with? If so, do tell the world why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 281 by bluegenes, posted 02-03-2012 5:41 PM bluegenes has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3312 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 297 of 327 (651292)
02-06-2012 9:51 AM
Reply to: Message 294 by Kairyu
02-05-2012 5:50 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
WSW24 writes:
I presume he doesn't define something a full person until it gains sentience.
I'm an atheist (militant actually) and I am absolutely convinced human life begins at the point of conception.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Kairyu, posted 02-05-2012 5:50 PM Kairyu has not replied

  
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 298 of 327 (651332)
02-06-2012 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by Coragyps
02-05-2012 11:41 AM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
coragyps writes:
I don't know. Can a two-day-old anencephalic baby be sentient with no forebrain?
I was asking bluegenes a question based upon one of his posts. I imagine that such a baby could be sentient in some way, but I don't know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by Coragyps, posted 02-05-2012 11:41 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 299 of 327 (651335)
02-06-2012 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by Perdition
02-03-2012 3:36 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
Perdition writes:
What is the difference between a single-celled blastocyst and a stem cell in my bone marrow? Both are single cells, both can create multiple different cells that are necessary for "higher organization."
A zygote has all the information necessary for the full growth of the organism.
A stem cell in your bone marrow will make only stem cells for your marrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Perdition, posted 02-03-2012 3:36 PM Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 303 by Perdition, posted 02-06-2012 3:59 PM shadow71 has replied

  
shadow71
Member (Idle past 2955 days)
Posts: 706
From: Joliet, il, USA
Joined: 08-31-2010


Message 300 of 327 (651338)
02-06-2012 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by Kairyu
02-05-2012 5:50 PM


Re: So what was the point of this thread?
wsw24 writes:
Can you make any conclusions with the discussed matter Shadow? In which phase do you define personhood and sentience? And if the soul is part of the answers, the problem of the zygote death rate arises once again. Or do you solely base your stance against abortion on the fact a zygote may develop into a human.
I have stated in this thread that I believe the zygote is a human being and I cited the paper by Dr. Maureen L Condic for the scientific basis for this opinion.
In re sentience, I agree with James A. Shapiro a prof at the Univ. of Chicago in the dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, who has stated single cells have some degree of sentience.
Dr. Shapiro has written a book "Evolution: a view from the 21st Century" where he sets forth his theories.
There is also a extensive comments about Dr. Shapiro and his work in the Forum Biological Evolution in the Thread entitled "Does the darwianian theory require modification or replacement."
The Thread is closed but if you wish you can review it.
I base my opposition to abortion on my opinion that it takes the life of a human being, and I consider a zygote to be a human being and thus it has a soul.
That is my moral and religious belief.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Kairyu, posted 02-05-2012 5:50 PM Kairyu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by Straggler, posted 02-06-2012 3:04 PM shadow71 has replied
 Message 302 by Rahvin, posted 02-06-2012 3:40 PM shadow71 has replied
 Message 304 by JonF, posted 02-06-2012 4:00 PM shadow71 has replied
 Message 305 by NoNukes, posted 02-06-2012 4:24 PM shadow71 has not replied
 Message 307 by jar, posted 02-06-2012 5:38 PM shadow71 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024