Another Republican representative lies in the gay marriage debate.
She said she wouldn't wax eloquent.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
That's it? Something that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with "the debate"?
She's a Republican. She's supposed to oppose same-sex marriage. That's her party-culture's requirement of her, if not her party's. But instead of being a typical party tool, she decided to be a Mensch, a genuine person. She spoke from her heart and her heart told her plainly and clearly that this hatred against love is wrong.
She spoke the truth, from her heart. I cannot see how she had lied, except perhaps in a very narrow literalist interpretation. But then I have never been a literalist ... except when I read the Bible which then led to my becoming an atheist.
PS And even though none of us knows just exactly who "Eloquent" is, whether he/she gets waxed or not, and by whom, should always be kept in private.
Not really, that I could see. Yes, she did say that she would not wax eloquent, yet she did. That would have been true of any issue under consideration.
The "debate" was and is about same-sex marriage. Her party would have anticipated her coming out against, yet her own self and experience brought her out in favor.
But still, the fact of her waxing eloquent when she said she wouldn't has no bearing on the issue itself.
The state drink of Chihuahua and Durango?
Sounds intriguing. I'll check it out.
For medicinal purposes.
Years ago, my suegra (mother-in-law) send me a humor list, "Sabes que eres mexicano cuando:" ("You know you're Mexican when ... "; OBTW, she's Mexican). One entry was: "4. Piensas que el Tequila cura la gripa y otras enfermedades." ("you think that tequila cures the flu and other illnesses.").
When I have a sore throat or a bad muscle pain, I take tequila for it. It does seem to help. Especially as a muscle relaxant.
Not really, that I could see. Yes, she did say that she would not wax eloquent, yet she did. That would have been true of any issue under consideration.
I think you missed the gentle humour in Subbie's post. If you re-read it with the understanding that Subbie is not anti-gay, then it becomes a different kind of post.
If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
That's it? Something that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with "the debate"?
anytime you can slander the right or the republicans, it is ALWAYS on topic and acceptable here @ EvC. you should know that double standard by now.
She's a Republican. She's supposed to oppose same-sex marriage. That's her party-culture's requirement of her, if not her party's. But instead of being a typical party tool, she decided to be a Mensch, a genuine person. She spoke from her heart and her heart told her plainly and clearly that this hatred against love is wrong.
i disagree, I don't think being a republican means you have to be against two people who love each other getting married.
anytime you can slander the right or the republicans, it is ALWAYS on topic and acceptable here @ EvC. you should know that double standard by now.
Pray tell, dear lad, specifically what slander are you referring to?
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
Pray tell, dear lad, specifically what slander are you referring to?
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
™ Version 4.2
