God the father

An omnipotent parent would be able to do whatever is needed to ensure their child survives and succeeds in life.
An omnipotent parent is not limited to "only do[ing] so much".Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

No it doesn't.A child will want to play with fire.
As a human parent, you try (and probably fail) to prevent your child from playing with fire.
As an omnipotent parent, you successfully prevent a child from playing with fire.
Their 'wants' are irrelevant.It is a parent's duty/responsibility to ensure the well-being of their children.
Omnipotent parents wouldn't find that a difficult task.An omnipotent parent would ensure that their children were restored to life.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Do you really not know the difference between a human parent and an omnipotent parent?
Do you really not see a difference between them?
Do you really not see how 'being omnipotent' would be different from 'not being omnipotent'? Your sentence contradicts itself.
You say you aren't talking about their 'wants' and then you start talking about what they have to want. Answer:A human parent can only do so much to help their child survive or succeed in life.
An omnipotent parent can do all that is needed for their child to survive and succeed in life.Perhaps it would help if you could give an example of something that an omnipotent parent would not be able to do...Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

I have already addressed these questions:So - in summary: A human parent can only do so much to help their child survive or succeed in life.
But an omnipotent parent can do all that is needed for their child to survive and succeed in life. A human parent could only do so much to help their child survive or succeed in life.
Whereas an omnipotent parent would do all that is needed for their child to survive and succeed in life. A human parent can only do so much to help their child survive or succeed in life.
In contrast. an omnipotent parent can do all that is needed for their child to survive and succeed in life.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : Hopefully increased the clarity of the obvious.

Ah - I see you were knowingly using an uncommon definition of the word 'omnipotent'.
Perhaps if you had explained that you weren't using the normal meaning of the word we could have got to this point sooner.Why were you being deceitful?

Then you should have used his definition.
But instead you decided to dishonestly attempt a juvenile 'gotcha' where you use a definition completely different to everyone else.
But you knew this - which is why I accused you of deceit. Since you knew you were using an 'alternative' definition, the onus was on you to give the meaning.
But you were too busy giggling at your stupid word-game to debate honestly. I did not insinuate anything.
I stated it very clearly.
I even explained how you were being deceitful. I cannot be certain of what you mean. Since you insist on using obscure definitions of words - but intentionally keep that from us - I have no confidence that you are using normal parlance.
You will need to explain every single word as you cannot be trusted not to switch meanings half way through the discussion. And when it comes to discussions you value stupid semantic tricks over honesty or accuracy.So - why were you being deceitful? This is the second time I have asked.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Maybe you should read the 2 similar accusations that Theodoric and Rahvin made. And this would be a confession of disingenuous debating.There is no point discussing anything with you because you don't decide the meaning of words until you need to win the argument and then you find an obscure meaning so that your previous claims don't look wrong.

And I am sure that you think that is relevant to something. And there is no logic at all in there being a god - go figure. I am going to call 'Bullshit' on your clearly false assertion. And since googling the phrase "superbly omnipotent God" returns no results, it would actually seem to only be popular with you. Oh don't be stupid. There are no "powers and restrictions" applicable to the role of being a father.
Any powers and restrictions are due to the 'species' of the father.
Your laughable implication that a 'deity' father has the same powers and restrictions as a 'human' father is blatantly false.

Deny your culpability all you want but... ___ What?!? You expect me to read your entire 8 years of posting history to know what you mean? Hahahaha!No.

I have not asked for evidence and the only time I mentioned 'winning the argument' is when I was criticising PD 'gotcha' technique. It was PurpleDawn who was framing the argument for the mere sake of winning. This makes little sense to me - but whatever.
Since you are basically telling me to leave, I will.
Cya.