I happen to have a different hypothesis.
With no evidence. Therefore pseudoscience.
it must need a code or factor to make it compatible with those of science.
The woo is strong in this one.
Genesis 5:2. Adam was both male and female (a "them," not a "him").
Provide some sort of rationale for this radical interpretation. Show us the original language and how you foot to that interpretation. What version of the "Bible" are you using for this bizarre interpretation. Do you not think it is a little strange that no one has seriously proposed this before you?
Granny touches quite well on other points but I ahve a couple.
If indeed, Neanderthal was wiped out 30,000 years ago, then they may well have been the target of the Flood. Why?
Please show evidence for the flood in the geological record. Also, what is your mechanism for how th Neanderthals and the hybrid population were wiped out but not Homo Sapiens. I assume you will just present more wild ass conjecture.
One thing is for certain: Homo sapiens can never again commit the "crime" (if it was one) of sexual procreation with Homo neanderthalensis. The "Flood" event did its job well.
Hmm, no. Remember this is a science thread. You are reaching a conclusion on based upon wildass conjectures with no evidence to back them up. That makes your conclusions meaningless.
"crime"? really? You want to bring in moralizing to this thread?
Of course, I usually don't like discussing specifics with curmudgeons. Egos are such messy things; I despise my own.
Sounds like a psychological issue, get therapy. I love and embrace my ego.
But then again depends on what definition of ego you are using. If you are using the Freudian concept, you are a bigger woo-meister than I thought.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts