Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Request for help re light speed, emission of light, and time
vimesey
Member (Idle past 94 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


(1)
Message 1 of 9 (655067)
03-06-2012 11:04 AM


I was wondering if I could ask some of our resident scientists to talk me through something which is causing me some confusion.
I have seen it explained in the past, on this site (although finding this will take more time than I have, so sorry there's no link), that whilst from, say, our perspective, it takes a photon of light 8 minutes to travel from the sun to the earth, from the perspective of the photon, it takes no time at all. It is travelling spatially at the speed of light, and therefore from its perspective its movement through the dimension of time is zero (since spatial velocity plus velocity in time cannot exceed C). (In fact, it is always equal to C, for everything).
(I am no scientist, so apologies for any awful expressions here).
What I find confusing therefore, is that in certain circumstances, light can be seen to act as a wave. This indicates to my simple way of thinking that a photon of light travelling in direction x spatially, will during that journey alternate between travelling in a positive and then a negative and then a positive y direction, and so on.
If its y direction during its journey alternates between positive and negative, does this not mean that the photon of light is undergoing a number of changes in state during its journey ?
And if this is the case, how is that reconciled with (from the perspective of the photon) no time passing during its journey ? In order for its state to change, does this not necessarily mean that time is passing from its perspective ? A change in state requires time to pass, doesn't it ?
Can somebody please tell me where I am going wrong ?
Many thanks.
vimesey
Edited by vimesey, : Had another thought

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Taq, posted 03-06-2012 7:32 PM vimesey has not replied
 Message 4 by kbertsche, posted 03-06-2012 8:09 PM vimesey has not replied

  
vimesey
Member (Idle past 94 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


(1)
Message 8 of 9 (655169)
03-08-2012 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by kbertsche
03-07-2012 10:07 AM


Thanks guys - I think you've shown me where I'm going wrong - I'm thinking in Newtonian/Euclidian terms, in a quantum environment.
Next job - to get my mind around the quantum analysis ! :-)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by kbertsche, posted 03-07-2012 10:07 AM kbertsche has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024