Understanding through Discussion

QuickSearch

 Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
 69 online now: AZPaul3, nwr, PaulK (3 members, 66 visitors) Newest Member: MidwestPaul Post Volume: Total: 893,317 Year: 4,429/6,534 Month: 643/900 Week: 167/182 Day: 0/47 Hour: 0/0

 Announcements: Security Update Released

Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 162 of 194 (654904) 03-05-2012 12:22 PM Reply to: Message 154 by frako03-03-2012 4:13 AM

Re: Population growth Models – TWO DIFFERENT ONES
-

 frako writes:Year World Population in Millions 70,000 BC | <0.015 10,000 BC | 1

-

There is no Specificity, no real Math working but simply a jump from 70 directly to 10.

Is this to be called a population growth model ?

-

Bring up a more specific Model, if you have one, please

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 154 by frako, posted 03-03-2012 4:13 AM frako has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 164 by frako, posted 03-05-2012 12:55 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 163 of 194 (654906) 03-05-2012 12:34 PM Reply to: Message 161 by Coyote03-05-2012 12:16 PM

-

 Coyote writes:This is absolute nonsense.

I agree. He should have compared humans with coyotes

-

 This message is a reply to: Message 161 by Coyote, posted 03-05-2012 12:16 PM Coyote has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 165 of 194 (654912) 03-05-2012 2:33 PM Reply to: Message 164 by frako03-05-2012 12:55 PM

Model p x 10 - 80 % is uniquely a measurement line
-

quote:

This population growth Model p x 10 - 80 % is uniquely a measurement line that clears up what the multiplication rate is. It's not an equation taken from real documents since there are no real documents from 50 thousand years ago.

The multiplication rate p x 15 - 80 % is not presented as a product of research brought from official rates but solely a Model that proofreads the multiplication rates proposed by a theory that places the Humans to multiply on the Earth for more than 70 thousand years ago.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 164 by frako, posted 03-05-2012 12:55 PM frako has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 166 by Percy, posted 03-05-2012 3:31 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action Message 167 by frako, posted 03-05-2012 6:27 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 169 of 194 (655052) 03-06-2012 3:59 PM

Timeline and the population growth of England
-

Okay, responding to the objections.

-

The agricultural technology, and the alleged need of it, has been a constant objection where truth was synthetized to an excessive and exaggerated dependence on farming activity since it wasn't a foundamental condition for humans to grow and multiply but just one of the options the Humans chose.

-

Timeline can be divided into 7 sections.

-

|________________II____________________IV___________________VI________________
|______I____|__________|____III___|__________|_____V____|__________|____VII_____|

-

|___ 49,000 ____ 42,000 ____ 35,000 ____ 28,000 ____ 21,000 ____ 14,000 ____ 7,000 ____
|_____________________________________________________________________________

-

In the sections I, II and III all families of fishermen do not have to change their fishing activities into farming so that they continued to grow and multiply. The same rule applies to the remaining 4 sections and it doesn't change from 49,000 years ago until now: those who like fishing, hunting, mining or any other activity do not have to become farmers so that they can continue to bring food, fish and meat to their homes.

Therefore there's no truth in the distortion when speaking about farming and agricultural technology as if 55,000 families of European fishermen from section III, II and I:, who never chose to do anything different, would depend so much on changing their fishing into agricultural activities so that they could survive, grow and multiply. They always stored their fish. Nothing really changes from a section to another.

55,000 families of European fishermen would always continue to grow their population x 15 - 80 % every thousand years or even 1 to 10 - 80 %, whether in section III, II or I, but many will not see the evidence nor verify for consistency of the population growth model. Much less ascertaining will be seen that the truth has been synthesized (gathered) with lies.

So you know that the seeing of the evidences have been omitted: there's nothing beyond REALISTIC than a termination/annihilation of '- 80 %' per every thousand years.

-

To go from 1,500,000 to 45,000,000 England took just 911 years.

-

43: 1,000,000
410: 1,500,000
865: 1,500,000
1000: 1,500,000
1348: 3,500,000
1350: 2,250,000
1642: 6,000,000
1649: 5,700,000
1801: 10,942,646
1851: 27,368,736
1911: 45,221,615
-

If their population growth was according to the thin red line, 'population x 15 - 80 %', England would have taken OVER and BEYOND THREE THOUSAND years to reach that 1,500,000.

-
| 1 thousand years | . . . . 2,000 x 15 = 30,000 - 80 % = 6,000 persons
| 2 thousand years | . . . . 6,000 x 15 = 90,000 - 80 % = 18,000 persons
| 3 thousand years | . . . .18,000 x 15 = 270,000 - 80 % = 54,000 persons
| 4 thousand years | . . . .54,000 x 15 = 810,000 - 80 % = 162,000 persons
| 5 thousand years | . . . 162,000 x 15 = 2,430,000 - 80 % = 486,000 persons
| 6 thousand years | . . . 486,000 x 15 = 7,290,000 - 80 % = 1,458,000 persons
| 7 thousand years | . . 1,458,000 x 15 = 21,870,000 - 80 % = 4,374,000 persons
|
| 8 thousand years | . . 4,374,000 x 15 = 65,610,000 - 80 % = 13,122,000 persons
| 9 thousand years | . .13,122,000 x 15 = 196,830,000 - 80 % = 39,366,000 persons
|10 thousand years | . .39,366,000 x 15 = 590,490,000 - 80 % = 118,098,000 persons
|11 thousand years | . 118,098,000 x 15 = 1,771,470,000 - 80 % = 354,294,000 persons
|12 thousand years | . 354,294,000 x 15 = 5,314,410,000 - 80 % = 1,062,882,000 persons
|13 thousand years | 1,062,882,000 x 15 = 15,943,230,000 - 80 % = 3,188,646,000 persons
|14 thousand years | 3,188,646,000 x 15 = 47,829,690,000 - 80 % = 9,565,938,000 persons

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : synthesized (gathered) with lies

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : for consistency

 Replies to this message: Message 170 by frako, posted 03-06-2012 4:27 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied Message 173 by RAZD, posted 03-06-2012 8:21 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 171 of 194 (655059) 03-06-2012 4:59 PM Reply to: Message 170 by frako03-06-2012 4:27 PM

Re: Timeline and the population growth of England
-

 frako writes:how about something that killed off 80% of yearly growth of the population every year

-

Frako, no need to make a storm in a cup of water, nor search for a horn in a mare's head, otherwise you will be poking a sleeping leopard with a short stick

-

 This message is a reply to: Message 170 by frako, posted 03-06-2012 4:27 PM frako has taken no action

 Replies to this message: Message 172 by Panda, posted 03-06-2012 7:34 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 174 of 194 (655129) 03-07-2012 5:03 PM Reply to: Message 173 by RAZD03-06-2012 8:21 PM

Population Growth Realm
-

Was there ever four seasons in the year without a good time for fishing ?

Fishermen know that during the seasons of every year there is a good time for fishing and those great times of the year have always been present from 50 thousand years ago.

Therefore, for a thousand families of fishermen to become 10,000 persons it has never been a question of WHEN they lived, whether 50 thousand or 35 thousand years ago, but WHERE their fishing activities are done.

That's why many graphics made to be presented as (evidence of) accurancy of the evolution theory (for the origin of the Human body) does not show an increase of fishing as they do with the farmer activity.

-

The fishermen final production can be changed every season of the year

but their population increase can't be stopped every thousand years

One ascertains the above truth from seeing that from the many graphics made to be presented as (evidence of) accurancy of the evolution theory (for the origin of the Human body),

Not one of them indicates that the population of a thousand families of fishermen in Europe could not increase from a thousand to 10,000 persons every thousand years, IF indeed there were families of Humans multiplying on the Earth from 70 thousand years ago.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : graphics made to be presented as (evidence of) accurancy of the evolution theory

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : from a thousand to 10,000 persons

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 173 by RAZD, posted 03-06-2012 8:21 PM RAZD has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 175 by RAZD, posted 03-07-2012 5:44 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 176 of 194 (655205) 03-08-2012 4:22 PM Reply to: Message 157 by caffeine03-05-2012 11:09 AM

THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED – and they still indicate global termination
-

This population growth Model p x 10 - 80 % is uniquely a measurement line that clears up what the multiplication rate is. It's not an equation taken from real documents since there are no real documents from 50 thousand years ago.

The multiplication rate p x 15 - 80 % is not presented as a product of research brought from official rates but solely a Model that proofreads the multiplication rates proposed by a theory that places the Humans to multiply on the Earth for more than 70 thousand years ago.

When a multiplication rate is omitted then the Evolution theory does not publish their numbers in the form of a population growth Model. However, that doesn't mean the Evolution model for population increase can't be gathered into one place.

The following multiplication rates are based on numbers that were brought up (message 157) and would be matching with the Evolution theory for the origin of the Human body:

-

_______________ [ 5,000 people between the time from 50,000 to 25,000 years ago ]

-

| 70 thousand years ago: 200 x 10 = 2,000 - 90 % = 200 persons
|
| 65 thousand years ago: 500 x 10 = 5,000 - 90 % = 500 persons
|
| 60 thousand years ago: 1,000 x 10 = 10,000 - 90 % = 1,000 persons
|
| 55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 persons

-
_______________ [ their 95% confidence interval puts the population between 1,700 and 37,700 people ]

-
| 50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 persons
|
| 45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 persons
|
| 40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000- 90 % = 3,500 persons
|
| 35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 persons
|
| 30 thousand years ago: 10,000 x 10 = 100,000 - 90 % = 10,000 persons
|
| 25 thousand years ago: 37,700 x 10 = 377,000 - 90 % = 37,700 persons

-
_______________ [ After this, the population would have decreased ]

_______________ [ they estimate it grew to between 11,300 and 72,600 people ]

-
| 20 thousand years ago: 11,300 x 10 = 113,000 - 50 % = 56,500 persons
|
| 15 thousand years ago: 72,600 x 10 = 726,000 - 10 % = 653,400 persons
|
| 10 thousand years ago: 1,000,000 x 10 = 10,000,000 - 90 % = 1,000,000 persons

-

 caffeine writes: demography is done, by looking at the evidence of the real world

-

Sample of Official demographic numbers and solely one of the real evidences on how the Human populations increase:

| 43: 1,000,000
| 410: 1,500,000
| 865: 1,500,000
| 1000: 1,500,000
| 1348: 3,500,000
| 1350: 2,250,000
| 1642: 6,000,000
| 1649: 5,700,000
| 1801: 10,942,646
| 1851: 27,368,736
| 1911: 45,221,615

Source: Institute of Historical Research, of the University of London.

-

When you look at the evidences of the real world – that is, specifically the demographic documents with completeness and fullness of reality: documents legitimated by the official demographic institutes from any European country, – the result is that it's not possible for one to find anything that comes close to the multiplication rate population x 10 - 90 % per every thousand years with a short 150 years interval for multiplication.

Much less with a constant intermittency, global termination occuring with regularity every 5,000 years interval along a timeline of 55,000 thousand years.

The fact that the multiplication rate, population x 10 - 90 % per every thousand years, equates to a short 150 years interval for multiplication, neither fits into the reality of the Earth's consistency nor expresses the Human nature and behavior in regards to their children since it equates to annihilation on a global scale happening incessantly.

-

| 55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 persons
|
| 50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 persons
|
| 45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 persons
|
| 40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000- 90 % = 3,500 persons
|
| 35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 persons

-

The finals (the totals) can be changed and they still indicate global termination occurring from a thousand years to another.

-

♯ ♯ ♯ – Anomaly has been found – The number of children would always be the same from the beginning to the end of every 3,000 year interval which equates to the time that the families would not multiply. The time that the families would multiply on a regular basis equates to a timeline of 150 years, and corresponds to a second interval. Both timeline intervals can be seen every 5,000 years along a timeframe of 55,000 years.

See through this point of view: 3,000 years interval + 150 years, in every 5,000 years, still leaves a third interval of 1,850 years.

-

_____p x 10 - 90 % interval______________multiplication rate__________remaining interval____
|_________3,000 years____________|_regular basis: 150 years___|______1,850 years________|

-

________________________ 5,000 years Timeline _____________________________________________
|_______________________________________________________________________________________|

-

______________ Average of years without multiplying: 4,850 years per every 5,000 years

-

That's why the problem is not a question of a constant decrease caused by a variety of factors.

The problem is that the difference between these three intervals: 3,000 years, 150 and 1,850 years, occurring simultaneously, every 5,000 years timeline, \[b\]is a difference which is indicating that their multiplication timeline (which corresponds to 150 years in a regular basis) is not enough time for them to increase so that their population could have a decrease in that same measure.

The anomaly is the impossibility of decreasing more than the measure that their population would have increased.

When seeing from the three intervals a difference that equates to an average of 4,850 years without multiplying to increase, observation shows that the remaining timeline of 150 years which equates to the time of their multiplication on a regular basis, would never be enough time for them to increase a population growth that could be compatible with the 4,850 years interval in which they would not multiply (on a regular basis) and their population would decrease.

On this, when verifying for consistency of the natural selection theory (for the origin of the Human body) the results are known and ascertained from seeing a lack of consistency in the multiplication rate.

Therefore these results can only be disproved by the presentation of new results that can show that their multiplication rate was consistent and that no disconnection is found between the regular basis that the Humans do multiply and the time that the Evolution theory has proposed for their multiplication.

'THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED' means that the order of the totals does not change the Time average that equates to their multiplicaton rate: 150 years per every 5,000 years, based on the numbers proposed for their multiplication by the Evolution theory for the origin of the Human body,

The totals can be changed and it would still not avoid the anomaly of decreasing always more than increasing.

One might verify and know, from the multiplication rate of the population growth model presented by the Evolution theory, that they could never have increased enough so that their population decreases could have happened in the compatible measure that corresponds to a 4,850 years interval per every 5,000 years.

Because Humans do multiply according to a regular basis of intensity which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolution theory. The diagnosis was completed and the anomaly can't be reversed.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : NOTE - For a better comprehension of message 167 the related informations might be gathered into one place.
And for that reason message 176 might be often re-edited.

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : The anomaly is the impossibility of decreasing more than the measure that their population would have increased.

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Brief Summarized Signature

This Laconic unusual inscription might change the ritualistical monotonous way that the signatures have been summarized in these days.
As the official master of non–ceremonious solemnity I’d like to thank you, beforehand, for your possible acceptance of the highly recommended anti-religion procedures of not taking as true what so ever it is believed that the truth is supposed to be, – since the term ‘take as (alike; as if it was)’ means that a comparison is made to a truth that is not known by believing --,as well as renouncing the fides quae creditur (faiths that are credited by the spirits of men, believers and potentates from down). Also I would like to thank for your patience and perseverance on reading and I hope these explanations will not sound too ceremonious to you.

 This message is a reply to: Message 157 by caffeine, posted 03-05-2012 11:09 AM caffeine has taken no action

 Replies to this message: Message 177 by RAZD, posted 03-08-2012 7:17 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied Message 178 by Percy, posted 03-09-2012 8:13 AM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 181 of 194 (655346) 03-09-2012 4:59 PM Reply to: Message 177 by RAZD03-08-2012 7:17 PM

Re: THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED – and they still indicate global termination
-

RAZD, if you have a time, please bring up any sample of multiplication rate,
whether from your works or from documents provided by the official demographic institutes.
so that you can disprove with evidence the multiplication rate that you said is not valid

quote:

The fishermen final production can be changed every season of the year

but their population increase can't be stopped every thousand years

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 177 by RAZD, posted 03-08-2012 7:17 PM RAZD has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 184 by RAZD, posted 03-10-2012 8:09 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 182 of 194 (655350) 03-09-2012 5:16 PM Reply to: Message 178 by Percy03-09-2012 8:13 AM

DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM – the three intervals anomaly
-

Percy, the basic numbers were brought up from message 157 as the re-edited fragment clears up.

-

quote:
The following multiplication rates are based on numbers that were brought up in message 157 and would be matching with the Evolution theory for the origin of the Human body

Sample of Official demographic numbers and solely one of the real evidences on how the Human populations increase:

| 43: 1,000,000
| 410: 1,500,000
| 865: 1,500,000
| 1000: 1,500,000
| 1348: 3,500,000
| 1350: 2,250,000
| 1642: 6,000,000
| 1649: 5,700,000
| 1801: 10,942,646
| 1851: 27,368,736
| 1911: 45,221,615

Source: Institute of Historical Research, of the University of London.

-

When you look at the evidences of the real world – that is, specifically the demographic documents with completeness and fullness of reality: documents legitimated by the official demographic institutes from any European country, – the result is that it's not possible for one to find anything that comes close to the multiplication rate population x 10 - 90 % per every thousand years with a short 150 years interval for multiplication.

Much less with a constant intermittency, global termination occuring with regularity every 5,000 years interval along a timeline of 55,000 thousand years.

The fact that the multiplication rate, population x 10 - 90 % per every thousand years, equates to a short 150 years interval for multiplication, neither fits into the reality of the Earth's consistency nor expresses the Human nature and behavior in regards to their children since it equates to annihilation on a global scale happening incessantly.

-

| 55 thousand years ago: 2,000 x 10 = 20,000 - 90 % = 2,000 persons
|
| 50 thousand years ago: 1,700 x 10 = 17,000 - 90 % = 1,700 persons
|
| 45 thousand years ago: 2,500 x 10 = 25,000 - 90 % = 2,500 persons
|
| 40 thousand years ago: 3,500 x 10 = 35,000- 90 % = 3,500 persons
|
| 35 thousand years ago: 5,000 x 10 = 50,000 - 90 % = 5,000 persons

-

The finals (the totals) can be changed and they still indicate global termination occurring from a thousand years to another.

-

♯ ♯ ♯ – Anomaly has been found – The number of children would always be the same from the beginning to the end of every 3,000 year interval which equates to the time that the families would not multiply. The time that the families would multiply on a regular basis equates to a timeline of 150 years, and corresponds to a second interval. Both timeline intervals can be seen every 5,000 years along a timeframe of 55,000 years.

See through this point of view: 3,000 years interval + 150 years, in every 5,000 years, still leaves a third interval of 1,850 years.

-

_____p x 10 - 90 % interval______________multiplication rate__________remaining interval____
|_________3,000 years____________|_regular basis: 150 years___|______1,850 years________|

-

________________________ 5,000 years Timeline _____________________________________________
|_______________________________________________________________________________________|

-

______________ Average of years without multiplying: 4,850 years per every 5,000 years

-

That's why the problem is not a question of a constant decrease caused by a variety of factors.

The problem is that the difference between these three intervals:

3,000 years, 150 and 1,850 years,

occurring simultaneously, every 5,000 years timeline, is a difference which is indicating that their multiplication timeline (which corresponds to 150 years in a regular basis) is not enough time for them to increase so that their population could have a decrease in that same measure.

The anomaly is the impossibility of decreasing more than the measure that their population would have increased.

When seeing from the three intervals a difference that equates to an average of 4,850 years without multiplying to increase, observation shows that the remaining timeline of 150 years which equates to the time of their multiplication on a regular basis, would never be enough time for them to increase a population growth that could be compatible with the 4,850 years interval in which they would not multiply (on a regular basis) and their population would decrease.

On this, when verifying for consistency of the natural selection theory (for the origin of the Human body) the results are known and ascertained from seeing a lack of consistency in the multiplication rate.

Therefore these results can only be disproved by the presentation of new results that can show that their multiplication rate was consistent and that no disconnection is found between the regular basis that the Humans do multiply and the time that the Evolution theory has proposed for their multiplication.

'THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED' means that the order of the totals does not change the Time average that equates to their multiplicaton rate: 150 years per every 5,000 years, based on the numbers proposed for their multiplication by the Evolution theory for the origin of the Human body,

The totals can be changed and it would still not avoid the anomaly of decreasing always more than increasing.

One might verify and know, from the multiplication rate of the population growth model presented by the Evolution theory, that they could never have increased enough so that their population decreases could have happened in the measure that corresponds to a 4,850 years interval per every 5,000 years.

Because Humans do multiply according to a regular basis which was not taken into consideration when the time proposed for their multiplication had been given by the Evolution theory.

The diagnosis was completed and the anomaly can't be reversed.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 178 by Percy, posted 03-09-2012 8:13 AM Percy has seen this message

 Replies to this message: Message 183 by Panda, posted 03-09-2012 6:56 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 185 of 194 (655691) 03-12-2012 5:50 PM Reply to: Message 184 by RAZD03-10-2012 8:09 PM

The Flood story only works as a parable. — Things are not as they seem to be
-

 RAZD writes:Multiplication rates are mathematical models not evidence. .. evidence of reality: the actual population data from past years. the actual population data from past years. If you don't understand this ..

-

One might understand and verify that every population data from past years does show a multiplication rate whenever these datas are connected from a point to another, e.g. from 55,000 years ago [ 2,000 people ] to 35,000 years ago [ 5,000 people ].

-

If you bring up to the front any evidence of reality: the actual population data from past years then you'll be bringing, undirectly, a multiplication rate which is a part of that same evidence because of the connection from a point to another.

-

quote:
Quoted from: non-published translations of SPOTLIGHT,

From those who take the road on their way to the conference about the Flood,
Reverend Will won't make it in time if it keeps on raining by the east side.

You perhaps will have to start the debate without him.

The point is that the Ark of Noah's story never happened. The whole subject that you read in the bible about Noah's Ark is a story that only works as a Parable of the Miserability.

Is there anyone of you that being rich, powerful and owner of a variety of new ships, would ever say this to a best friend and his family:

'In order for me to give you a drop to the next unflooded city I can't let you enter in one of my ships, so you better start to build a boat.'

quote:
That is what many ministers, reverends and pastors do to anyone that treat them as alleged authorities anointed from above. They are rich, they ask for you to give them your resources, work and money and at the same time, they don't give anyone a drop to the next unflooded city.

They travel in a big jet plane but they don't share the riches that were bought with the people's money. They don't recognize that whoever gives money to a church automatically have rights of equality over 50% of the respective amount in case the person who gave the resource is found in lack of food, remedy, clothes and shelter.

Whoever gives money to a church still has two more rights. The right of transparency over the financial movement of the respective church and the right of devolution of 100% of all that was given in case a person writes a destitution letter declaring that it was not possible to preview that his[her] tenths of salary and his[her] offerings would have been left in the wrong place. They don't really share water, electric light, comfort and shelter with people of the church that support them.

If you had made the world; Why would you justify yourself and tell a man to write in a book that you have had regrets for having made the world because things didn't come up as you thought it woud be .. and for that reason you would have decided to get rid of it, when you know that it would be so much easier to cause the wicked ones to disappear by erasing their memories from their brain ?

Things are not as they seem to be. See the story of Isaac's sacrifice for example. It only works as a Parable of the Hipocrisy. Because, If a person already knows the thoughts and knows the end from the beginning then why would that person make a Hipocrite statement and tell Abraham this: 'I had to test your loyalty .. to know if you would love me above all things ..'

quote:

The bible was left to you for different reasons. One of them is that some contents are solely parables that were made specifically to intrigue you so that you might start thinking by your own head. At that moment, those who were at the Conference said:

- If these things were kept hidden in order for us to start thinking by ourselves then why do we need a reverend in the first place ?

- Hmmmm .. .. I don't know why.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Brief Summarized Signature

This Laconic unusual inscription might change the ritualistical monotonous way that the signatures have been summarized in these days.
As the official master of non–ceremonious solemnity I’d like to thank you, beforehand, for your possible acceptance of the highly recommended anti-religion procedures of not taking as true what so ever it is believed that the truth is supposed to be, – since the term ‘take as (alike; as if it was)’ means that a comparison is made to a truth that is not known by believing --,as well as renouncing the fides quae creditur (faiths that are credited by the spirits of men, believers and potentates from down). Also I would like to thank for your patience and perseverance on reading and I hope these explanations will not sound too ceremonious to you.

 This message is a reply to: Message 184 by RAZD, posted 03-10-2012 8:09 PM RAZD has seen this message

 Replies to this message: Message 186 by Percy, posted 03-12-2012 6:46 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 187 of 194 (655811) 03-13-2012 5:01 PM Reply to: Message 183 by Panda03-09-2012 6:56 PM

Re: DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM – the three intervals anomaly
-

 panda writes: crazy to think that colour scheme was a good idea.

-

The color scheme was re-edited as you requested.
Royalblue color has a shade of bright which becomes highlighted on a dark background.

If pandas were more Humans than they often are, would they have such a high society charming style of being worried with colors when the entire chronological basis of the Evolution theory [ in regards to the origin of the Human body ] is falling apart, perhaps literally sinking ?

The charm of having class above all circumstances might be a natural property of the Human pandas. An example that is left on how nature always finds her own charming ways to teach the other Human varieties of pandas

that the importance is having class.

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 183 by Panda, posted 03-09-2012 6:56 PM Panda has replied

 Replies to this message: Message 188 by caffeine, posted 03-14-2012 6:01 AM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action Message 189 by NoNukes, posted 03-14-2012 10:17 AM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action Message 190 by Panda, posted 03-14-2012 1:41 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 191 of 194 (655908) 03-14-2012 6:05 PM

EVOLUTION VERSUS EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT
-

You came from the light, from the place where the living light emanates from herself[ the ancient book of Tomah paraphrased ]

-

In Yhwh's [glittering] living word was the life, and the life was the light of man

[ that is, the life was the light contained within the Human body ]

-

The life of the Human body does not exist solely within the extension of the body itself.
The life that is the light or energy of living electricity does exist outside of the Human body, remaining in the world not solely within the boundaries of a person or of the mind but also glittering as lightning through the density of clouds of heaven.

There are other things to see along the open road. One can't stick to the first thing that shows up just because all official bible translations have been proven to be a blind leading blind causing both to fall into the disgrace of taking as true a truth that is not known by believing. There isn’t solely two options, creation and/or evolution, e.g.: what explanation do those two options provide about the Origin of the white Light that glitters as lightning through the density of the clouds ? Nothing at all.

Evidences are found that Creationism has been lost and goes into perdition since it was based on a badly revised ruined translation with a lot of holes and one of the lies it is saying is that man was created by a deity, a god or elohim (a form of baalim). The lying pen of the scribes, copists and translators from the doctorates on Modern Hebrew still makes no distinction between the common generic designation for deities, elohim [ god; oracles; abomination of the nations ] and the Hebrew word EL [ The Living Light that gives life ].

-

The Definition of Being Alive

-

By EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT one ascertains that being alive is not a property that emanated from the living beings themselves since their light of life [ their life energy ] can be taken or can be given by the living light in emanation.

All animals and fish were designed to evolve but they do not evolve all by themselves; It’s the life energy [ the living light that emanates ] in them that operates the power to reprogram their dna sequence. — e. g.: The living electricity that runs through the nervous system of the Human body corresponds to a time sequence which emanates not from the body itself. See the specifications of the times of impact and their sequences:

1st. phrímea — time of impact of the initial time that the living light glitters until 1 and half seconds

2nd. seqüencea — simultaneous and immediate sequence of the initial time of phrímea

3rd. términa — time of impact for termination of continuous sequence

½. mediata — time of impact for mediation between phrimea and permanêncea

lacônica — time of shortening of the light that connects knowledge and thoughts

simultânea — simultaneous and immediate sequence of a laconic time of shortening

permanêncea — permanence time of the living light that glitters not less than 7 seconds

-

[ .. to be continued in another discussion .. ]

-

Source: From non-published translation of SPOTLIGHT

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : The life of the Human body does not exist solely within the extension of the body itself.

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004

 Message 193 of 194 (655987) 03-15-2012 9:10 AM Reply to: Message 192 by Admin03-14-2012 8:17 PM

Re: Is discussion in this topic completed?
-

 From Message 191[ .. to be continued in another discussion .. ]

-

Hi Admin, there are some replies that needs to be posted, e.g.: to frako and to Messages 186 and 188,

There were two points to which Message 191 would have been useful:

1st. The Evolution theory was the only truth when this discussion started since Creationism is not founded on knowledge of truth but believing. [ in other words, the respective O.P. would not have been posted if there was not a third option that is EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT ]

2nd. There are evidences that the Creationism's point of view became obsolete, and for that, it was necessary to bring up a third option otherwise the only real debates on Human Origins would be occuring solely between defenders of the Evolution theory.

-

Therefore, message 191 might have been useful so that you might know that there is still an option for you to consider a debate,
EVOLUTION VERSUS EMANATION OF LIVING LIGHT, in the future.

-

------- Thank you

-

Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

 This message is a reply to: Message 192 by Admin, posted 03-14-2012 8:17 PM Admin has seen this message

 Date format: mm-dd-yyyy Timezone: ET (US)