Summations Only

That may well remain to be seen.

I am not a troll.

The crap that is emanating from your supermassive black hole has already been monitored, but nothing of any worth has appeared. I think the word you are looking for is 'Santorum'.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Nonetheless, it is what my theory suggests. Planet ejections caused the sunspots and CME's are after effects.
Thanks.

I haven't weighed in on this thread yet, Jet, but are you familiar with the concept of "evidence?"

Then what is it? Troubles at home? Drugs? Boredom? Or maybe you think everyone around here was taking themselves way too serious and what started off as a game actually developed into a social experiement as to how people really enjoy listening to themselves ramble on even when you're giving them clear nonsense to respond to showing once and for all that everyone loves a troll?Cuz that would be funny to me. - Oni

What I am suggesting is that no electrons are flowing. What I suggest is flowing, flows in both directions. That is why an overloaded fuse breaks in the middle of it. I suggest that the flow from both directions causes a bottleneck causing the break of a fuse to happen in the middle. I did not come up with this idea, but it is what has led me to my cosmological theory.

I did not say that the rings were ejecta, simply evidence of a collision, in this case a giant moon.
Next time I will peak.
Thank you very much for your input. It has been most helpful to me.

It is based on two books by Ed Leedskalnin.
Thanks.

The pressure is a time constraint.

Once again, under my theory, there is no singularity.

Whatever you call it.

Hi Jet,I assume you're unfamiliar with discussion boards because you're not quoting what you're replying to, and you just posted a large number of very short responses, one of them consisting of the single word "Thanks.". You're way over the border into trollish behavior.I've removed your reply permissions. To get them back please send me a PM (there's a link to your left) assuring me that you'll be using quote codes in the future and won't be posting any more long series of very short messages. If you feel the need to acknowledge a message then just click on the acknowledgement link at the bottom of the message.

Honestly, you don't have to reply to every message.Select a sample of messages that bring out the most important points, and reply only to those. For the others, you can click on the "You have not yet responded" line at the bottom of the post, as a way of acknowledging that you have seen that post but chosen to not reply.And pace yourself. If you only have time for 10 replies today, then only reply to those 10 (or whatever you think is a number you can handle). You can come back tomorrow to reply to some of the ones that you missed.When you reply rapidly, other people will respond to your posts just as rapidly. If you slow down your rate of replies, you will slow down the whole thread to a pace that you can handle. If done with care, you can greatly reduce the pressure that you sense.Oh, and there's no need to reply to this particular message.

Whoa there cowboy, that's quite a tall order.You know, since you obviously prefer words to equations in your theory of life, the universe, and everything may I offer a humble suggestion.Perhaps before you challenge the accepted knowledge concerning cosmology and relativity, wouldn't you like to know how it is done by those who have successfully achieved that very thing in general (or special) cases before you?Try the Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn, no math, not even a 42nd chapter IIRC, but it does unavoidably have a page 42.Just a bit of friendly advice.