Is evolution based on empirical science?

Absolutely not!Have we ever observed bacteria evolve into something else other than bacteria?What about fruitflies? Nope. Still the same even after decades of fruitfly experiments. Sure the mutants have a different form and such (albeit more sickly and less fit) but they are still fruitflies.Have we ever observed a reptile evolve into a bird?Have we ever observed molecules evolve into a life form? Nope and nope.Evolution is not based on hard science but made up stories by people who spent thousands of dollars to get a title on their name.Don't be deceived. You are not the result of billions of years of evolution.That said there are hardcore skeptics who say they only believe what they see but they have never seen evolution. A cat gives birth to a cat. A dog gives birth to a dog. People give birth to humans. Yet these same skeptics believe all life evolved from someprimordial cell without ever observing it. Talk about being inconsistent and loopy It takes a lot of faith to believe the evolution story.

How about fruitflies and bacteria?

Its in the OP.Fruit flies are still fruit flies despite decades of experiments on them. Same with bacteria. Bacteria is still bacteria. No one that I know of have observed it evolve into something that wasn't a fruitfly or bacteria.

So you agree evolution has never been observed? Great!