Perhaps science backs reality, but perhaps not. What if science is stuck in a scenario similar to Plato's cave because it deliberately ignores the supernatural? Science will remain blissfully unaware I suppose.
In Plato's cave, the subject can only see the shadows on the wall. They can not evaluate what they are seeing. They can't "turn around" or "cast their own shadow" or "look at their own body".
In other words, they do not experiment. They do not try and disprove what they are seeing.
Science ignores the supernatural because the supernatural does not exist. If it existed, it wouldn't be "super"natural, it would just be "natural".
When you try and include the supernatural into explanations about what is happening or how it is happening, you quickly realize that the supernatural is worthless.
Examples: The wind blows because...
A) Different air pressures in different areas are trying to equalize.
B) Zeus wants it to
C) Ghosts want it to
D) Baby Jesus wants it to
E) Thor wants it to
F) An invisible dragon wants it to
G) Bigfoot wants it to
....
ZZ) An UNKNOWN magical creature or being wants it to
That list is LITERALLY endless and only A offers us anything we can test and later use to explain other things.
If you allow for A supernatural explanation, then you must allow for ALL supernatural explanations which means that no question can be answered ever.
Worthless.