Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Tennessee Monkey Law!
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 91 of 126 (660066)
04-20-2012 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by DrJones*
04-20-2012 2:46 PM


Man up!
don't be scurred, sometimes what you have to say gets you a 24 hour banning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by DrJones*, posted 04-20-2012 2:46 PM DrJones* has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 92 of 126 (660070)
04-20-2012 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Artemis Entreri
04-20-2012 2:35 PM


I wonder if Catholic Scientist has a PHD? if not does that mean he is not really a scientist?
I gotta a PHD.... a pretty huge dick! but seriously, I only have a Bach. of Science.
A professional scientist is one that publishes original research. I use the term more loosely. But I do wear a lab coat and work in a lab (we were going to publish one of research projects but never got around to it). We're just in it to make money tho, whatever we gotta do to sell more of our shit, ya know? Too, a lot of the data we gather is just for technical purposes - supporting data for product claims n'stuff.
I picked the term for my name based on the following clip:
quote:
Janitor?
--What is it, Scientist?
quote:
Hey, I know this isn't your responsibility... but mop the rest of this shit up, I'll be right back

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Artemis Entreri, posted 04-20-2012 2:35 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:15 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 104 by Artemis Entreri, posted 04-23-2012 1:33 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 126 (660095)
04-20-2012 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by frako
04-17-2012 4:44 AM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
frako writes:
Razd & Taz, ole chumps, come, let us reason together.
Razd, you, liberal biased citizen, Big Banger evolutionist, secularistic minded citizen of these United States, would, by law, require each and every citizen in these 50 states to be subjected to what you think in your mindsets.
No just about basic facts and SCIENTIFIC theories.
Most Americans, including all creationists and many secularists do not ascribe to some basic alleged facts and scientific theories.
So now, you, Razd and Taz would require all, by law to be subjected to the science you ascribe to? All who refuse would be outlaws subjected to arrest?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by frako, posted 04-17-2012 4:44 AM frako has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by jar, posted 04-20-2012 9:10 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 100 by Taz, posted 04-21-2012 7:40 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 101 by frako, posted 04-22-2012 5:30 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 102 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-22-2012 7:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 94 of 126 (660096)
04-20-2012 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:07 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
Come on Buz, you don't arrest folk for being ignorant.
You just don't bother hiring them.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:07 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:48 PM jar has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 126 (660097)
04-20-2012 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by New Cat's Eye
04-20-2012 3:07 PM


Re Who Are Scientists?
CS writes:
A professional scientist is one that publishes original research.
So what do you call reserchers, and others doing science as a profession but never pulished?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-20-2012 3:07 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-20-2012 9:21 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 126 (660098)
04-20-2012 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:15 PM


Re: Re Who Are Scientists?
CS writes:
A professional scientist is one that publishes original research.
So what do you call reserchers, and others doing science as a profession but never pulished?
Amateurs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:15 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 126 (660100)
04-20-2012 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by jar
04-20-2012 9:10 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
jar writes:
Come on Buz, you don't arrest folk for being ignorant.
You just don't bother hiring them.
This is what all three agreed to:
Message 60

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by jar, posted 04-20-2012 9:10 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by jar, posted 04-20-2012 10:07 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 98 of 126 (660101)
04-20-2012 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:48 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
Do you ever read what you use as support Buz or is it like the Bible, just stuff you don't or can't actually read?
Where did any of them mention arresting folk?
It's time though we stopped hiring or electing people like Creationists or Fundamentalists.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:48 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


(1)
Message 99 of 126 (660115)
04-21-2012 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by Artemis Entreri
04-20-2012 2:35 PM


Are all science teachers scientists?
in your opinion is that what is required to "be a scientist"?
I asked you a question and suggested two possible criteria and rather than addressing my question you dodged it and responded with this obfuscatory dance?
Yes the principal criteria I would expect for someone to have some basis for calling themselves a scientist would be either to have done some serious research sufficient to have gained a higher degree such as a PhD or to be engaged in ongoing research. I know many technicians and research assistants who don't have PhDs that I would certainly consider scientists as they are still conducting research.
I wonder if Catholic Scientist has a PHD? if not does that mean he is not really a scientist?
Seriously? You think that people's names on a forum must rigorously represent their true status. It may shock you but I am not in fact a king and I have a strong suspicion that Artemis Entreri is not your real name.
That aside I'm quite prepared to believe that CS is a research scientist. There are corner cases where things are more vague, such as technicians who are masters of a specific set of techniques but only really use them to further others' research rather than being part of a coherent research program themselves. Say someone with expertise on producing histological sections who spends all day mounting, sectioning and staining specimens from whatever lab provides them but never does any analysis.
What criteria do you have for being a scientist? Mine are based around people actually doing or having done scientific research.
So to return to the actual question; how many High school science teachers do you think fit your criteria, whatever they may be?
Here in the UK nowadays most science teachers probably have a BSc in their specific field, Chemistry, Biology or Physics, but a couple of decades ago it was much more common to have people who had gone through specific teaching degrees that didn't do much more than cover the subjects to the level required to teach the curriculum. Even graduating with a BSc one is unlikely to have done any substantial research beyond a few months on and off in a lab on a fairly limited project. So I would say that most UK science teachers probably aren't what I would consider scientists.
TTFN,
WK
Edited by Wounded King, : Grammar

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Artemis Entreri, posted 04-20-2012 2:35 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Artemis Entreri, posted 04-23-2012 1:29 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 100 of 126 (660192)
04-21-2012 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:07 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
Buzsaw writes:
Most Americans, including all creationists and many secularists do not ascribe to some basic alleged facts and scientific theories.
Answer this one question, buzsaw. Ever since Obama took office, have we had any tax hike yet? Just answer this one simple question.
Edit.
I see that you quoted me in message 40. So, let me put it up in the whole context.
Watch that video again. Do you think he answered the question or not? If so, how? If not, is that the kind of morals you ascribe to?
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:07 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 101 of 126 (660245)
04-22-2012 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:07 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
Most Americans, including all creationists and many secularists do not ascribe to some basic alleged facts and scientific theories.
Yea that is why the whole world is laughing at America every day.

Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
Click if you dare!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:07 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 102 of 126 (660254)
04-22-2012 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Buzsaw
04-20-2012 9:07 PM


Re: Say What On Constitution?
Most Americans, including all creationists and many secularists do not ascribe to some basic alleged facts and scientific theories.
And many of them are fat as well as stupid. This is where national stereotypes come from.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Buzsaw, posted 04-20-2012 9:07 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 103 of 126 (660279)
04-23-2012 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Wounded King
04-21-2012 5:01 AM


agree to disagree
TLDR
whatever all that long winded nonsense was about.
sure whatever you say man, or don't say, or WTF you are talking about.
Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Wounded King, posted 04-21-2012 5:01 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4228 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 104 of 126 (660280)
04-23-2012 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by New Cat's Eye
04-20-2012 3:07 PM


I see what you did
Posting half backed movie clips on 4/20.
lol slick one.
Catholic Scientist writes:
A professional scientist is one that publishes original research. I use the term more loosely. But I do wear a lab coat and work in a lab (we were going to publish one of research projects but never got around to it). We're just in it to make money tho, whatever we gotta do to sell more of our shit, ya know? Too, a lot of the data we gather is just for technical purposes - supporting data for product claims n'stuff.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT!?! an answer to a simple question. I was simply asking a question to define what a scientist is, but this Scott babbles on and one about who knows what. Thanks American for answering a question instead of getting all defensive and talking a ton of shit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-20-2012 3:07 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


(3)
Message 105 of 126 (660307)
04-24-2012 8:48 AM


Artemis Entreri Posting Permissions Removed
I have removed the posting permissions of Artemis Entreri in this forum, Creation/Evolution In The News.
For everyone else, the topic is legislation in Tennessee. Please stay on topic.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024