Summations Only

You have won, thanks to Percy/Admin.He's banned one of your most effective creationists from all science forums which include some Biblical ones. When nearly all of you, his evolutionst members voted that Buzsaw be reinstated into Science forums, Percy's one bully pulpit vote trumped all of yours.He dogged me, demanding what to post next etc in the last Exodus thread and now member Percy is demanding that I cease and desist posting on topic messages relating to how commodity goods made investors of it wealthy while $$ assets infate, becoming ever more worthless making these people less wealthy. He cited Dr Adequate's response as well, demanding no more responses relating to my message. He's made similar demands, even at FreeForAll. Go figure why you've won.If Percy/Admin would leave the moderating up to Minnemooseus and the rest of his team of moderators, I assure you that you would not be winning and some other creationists might find this site a place where they would desire to stay and engage in debates.Creationists come and soon they're gone after Percy mothers/dogges them as to what they must and must not post. . They need some fair and balance from Percy/Admin before you can expect others to feel welcome.At 76, my business, church, garden and other activities limit my online time, especially during the summer, so if you all want more creationists you need to persuade Percy to stop running them off. He's nice to them at first, but sooner or later he drives them off.I don't see much from astute physicists like Son Goku and Cavediver, etc anymore. They and other astute scientists share the same frustration as Dr Adequate. Activity livens up and threads get hot when bonafide creationst vs evolutionist debates happen. Otherwise, about all this site amounts to is a round table discussion among evolutionits and Big Bangers.IMO, AdminPD needs to lighten up a bit on moderating as well. Imo, she needs to allow some more leeway in the treads relative to adherance to topic. IMO, moderating makes or breaks debate boards. Imo, the less, the better. It's the trolls and dumb-headed that they need to focus on. .

You're right that I'm not the typical creationist. That's why I'm effective in the dabates. My stuff is not easily refuted. The threads become active when I'm active due to the fact that there need to be more unique creationists not programmed into the same ole in the colleges etc.You're wrong about the right wing nutty conspiracy creationist.Where were you when you thought my stuff was nutty? Why were't you in there, effectively refuting it?

Why then do threads which I actively engage in tend to be long and hot?Why weren't you or rdp in there refuting what you two allege to be nutty and easily refuted?

What is proper relates to one's ideology. What is considered proper by one may not be proper in another's view.

Rpb, your own ignorance is showing. Nearly all late Presidents and especially Obama have been calling for a New World Order, just as was prophesied by the Old Testament and the New Testiment of the Bible for the these latter days. Nearly all world leaders are calling for one. It is indeed a conspiracy to absolve national sovereignty and ever increase the global order, imposing it on all nations by force if necessary until all citizens become subservient to a few powerful and brutal elete despots.It's sheeple like you who's ignorance allows it to happen. .[rbp]You are right. I do not participate enough. I lurk alot but i do not post alot.
I had enough of the creationism debate a few years ago and i have no reason to participate in creationism debate on this board since it is almost non existing.[/qs]Then that makes you a troll, posting nothing edifying. You're here criticizing us who do. You need to poop or get off the pot. You need to show evidence that they are bad. Here at EvC, one does not just declare stuff to be bad. You must do the evidence thing as the rest of us are required to do.

Thanks, Arterius. Yes, the answer to Dr Adequate's question is a no brainer, but they simply wave that reason off as it amounts to nothing. How can one participate if one is banned from doing so? Go figure, D.A. et al. Why would any newbies care to log in where they see how creationists are treated here.I don''t know why I bother any more. For the most part, I don't. Of course that pleases Percy and some of his cumbodies who can't take the heat of debate which gores their ox.

Well, at least our good Chinaman got your attention. IMO, it's the post of the month on behalf of EvC creationists.

That is, who EvC evolutionist sheeples do not take seriously.

Not sure, but likely relating to how the Crysper System applies the DNA factor, relative to macro-evolution, more-so than for evolution of species.

Make that micro-evolution rather than macro-evolution. Senior moment, ooorly thought out, post. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you add a bean you have six, but if you alter the qroperties of one of the five beans by sprouting one, you still have five; one having different properties than the other four. Either may be planted for propagation of more beans.

Tangle, Factoring my correction in Message 47 tell me and the www how far off my understanding of the system is. Were it not in the science field, I could participate in a topic on it, but alas, go figure where all the creationists have went.You fail to acknowledge in this personal attack message that I did correct myself. As has been pointed out already in this thread, the demeaning know-it-all attitude evolutionists have towards creationists has been demonstrated in this thread. It's typical of examples why creationists do not come or stay here at EvC.

The responses I've gotten from the last posters pertaining to macro, micro, etc are a classic example of where the creationists have gone and why.All that these antagonists have posted is yakety yak about Buz's ignorance. Not one of these have explained an edifying thing as to why macro and micro evolution are unrelated to the Crysper System and where-in I have it wrong, pertaining to DNA, etc.These same personal attackers demand evidence and reasons why I alledge that they are mistaken on a given Biblical issue. .Most of these same people think they know so much about the Bible, when, in fact they know little or nothing about how the prophecies, etc corroborate one another regarding evidence and so forth. When, in threads that they get it wrong, I usually correct them with chapters and verses etc. I show them how-in they are mistaken.

The solution is very simple. As NoNukes implied and as nearly 100% of evolutionists once voted, the solution is to allow Buzsaw to be Buzsaw in the common existing science forums as it was back in the good old days when the creo-evo debates were smokin.There was no shortage then and good people like Silas, Cavediver, et al had something controversial enough for robust debate. Admin/Percy should go on a long vacation and let the more fair and balanced moderators do the moderating.

One cannot excape the feeling that resident evolutionists do not understand, or allow for creation science talk. Your bully pulpit site owner simply bans it from debate so as for it to stand or fall on it's own merits.As for plain English, at times some you vindictive counterparts don't have it quite right either. When it comes to the meaning of the scientific term, evidence, you simply deny it all, including it's proper meaning.