Summations Only

How long have you been working on your thesis?Mutate and Survive

the truest post of the month.you should be quiet about the truth around here though, they love the masquerade that there is actual some "debate" here. and that it is "scientific" and "intellectually honest".you hit the nail on the head Buzsaw, the Admin here, censors the opposition.It makes this site completely lame except for entertainment purposes.Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.

One of the reasons I very rarely post is that even when the "anti-creationists" must admit that one of their pillars of evolution are not sound they respond with silly childist barbs. An example, when discussing mutations that are not random with regards to fitness such as the CRISPRSs system the replys are you don't know what your talking about. Well my question is: is the CRISPRS system an example of a dedicated non random, beneficial change that evolutionary theorists have excluded to this day?If so how can one have a debate when a valid point is ignored by the so called scientific experts, because it does not fit into their theory?

Thanks, Arterius. Yes, the answer to Dr Adequate's question is a no brainer, but they simply wave that reason off as it amounts to nothing. How can one participate if one is banned from doing so? Go figure, D.A. et al. Why would any newbies care to log in where they see how creationists are treated here.I don''t know why I bother any more. For the most part, I don't. Of course that pleases Percy and some of his cumbodies who can't take the heat of debate which gores their ox.

Wait, wait, this is a debate site? Really? Are you sure? You guys are going to have to inform Percy of this then, because he clearly also has no idea that this site was intended for debate.Perhaps you can put a big red message at the top of this site that says something like:ALTHOUGH WE DO NOT ALLOW CREATIONISTS TO VOICE THEIR SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT ON EvC, AND ALTHOUGH VIRTUALLY ANYTHING THEY SAY WILL EITHER BE CENSORED, OR THEY WILL BE ACCUSED OF BEING "OFF TOPIC" EVERY TIME THEY MAKE A VALID POINT, AND EITHER BE SUSPENDED OR REFUSED POSTING PRIVILEGES, OR BE INUNDATED WITH A BARRAGE OF AD HOMINEN ATTACKS THAT THEY ARE OBLIGATED TO RESPOND TO OR AGAIN WILL BE SUSPENDED, THIS "IS" A DEBATE SITE, AND THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IT AND ANY OTHER DEBATE FORUM IS THAT DEBATING IS NOT ALLOWED HERE BY, BY DICTATE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR.I think that would help to clear things up greatly.Oh and by the way, do you know that Eugenie Scott, Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers, as well as the entire body of the National Academy of Science all believe as a policy that evolutionists never fair well debating creationists, so they should avoid it when possible?Silly me, of course you must know that.

A bare-faced lie.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

What they avoid is public debates before stacked audiences and against creationists who practice the "Gish gallop." It is smart to avoid those venues.What creationists avoid like the plague is written debates were evidence is necessary and there is time to research your replies. Scientific journals are a prime example.Need evidence, eh? Guess that's why they do so poorly here also.

This is what you sound like when you type in caps.Edited by Nuggin, : No reason given.

Well, at least our good Chinaman got your attention. IMO, it's the post of the month on behalf of EvC creationists.

And then you wonder why people don't take you seriously.If you'll refer me to the relevant thread, I'll talk to you about this system. In the meantime, I will content myself with the following observation --- that the one and only, sole, singular reason that you know about this system is that "the so called scientific experts" discovered it. Was it discovered by creationists in their secret creationist laboratories? It was not. It was discovered by the very same "so called scientific experts" whom you now say have "ignored" their own discovery.

But of course they even let you post stuff like that, attacking them personally. Because this is the real world and not the fantasy world in your head. I do not "know" the stuff that you have made up in your head, because it is not, of course, true.---Now, do you have any fact that you can put forward in favor of creationism on some appropriate thread.? Only you seem to have dedicated many of your most recent posts to badmouthing evolutionists instead of discussing the natural world and competing ideas about how to explain it.

That is, who EvC evolutionist sheeples do not take seriously.

If you take him seriously, then please state in your own words what point he wishes to make about "the CRISPRSs system".Otherwise you yourself don't take him seriously, you just like that he's on your side.Tell me truthfully, before your God as witness, have you up until now ever spent five consecutive seconds thinking about the details of the CRISPRSs system? No? But you upvoted his post about it. And then you use the word "sheeples".

Not sure, but likely relating to how the Crysper System applies the DNA factor, relative to macro-evolution, more-so than for evolution of species.

Nice try at pretending that you know what you are saying, but it is completely undermined by the fact you failed to produce a cogent sentence.
But it is interesting to see your dishonesty - "before your God as witness".