Summations Only

So, when someone is imprisoned for tax avoidance, that is a breach of their human rights?
And when someone is imprisoned for trespassing, that is a breach of their human rights?
And when someone is imprisoned for burglary, that is a breach of their human rights?
And when someone is imprisoned for animal cruelty, that is a breach of their human rights?Or perhaps you would like to add some more criteria to your 'right of liberty'?

When I am pointing out a problem with Taq's position, it seems silly for you to jump in and say "But that is not what I think!".
/shrug And if you read what I wrote (here it is again):

quote:

---

And the fact that different people feel differently about something that only happens in certain countries shows how non-universal the human right of 'liberty' is.

---

...you can see that I didn't say that they didn't exist.
In fact, you have pretty much repeated what I wrote.Try this:
If one person thinks that humans have a right to liberty and another person thinks that humans don't have a right to liberty, how do you determine which of them is correct?

I'll fix that for you: The right of liberty is the right to stay out of prison if you have not interfered with the liberties of others, or broken an unspecified social contract. The right of liberty is the right to stay out of prison if you have not interfered with the liberties of others, or broken an unspecified social contract or violated other peoples' rights. The right of liberty is the right to stay out of prison if you have not interfered with the liberties of others, or broken an unspecified social contract or violated other peoples' rights or do certain other things that don't break any of the previous rules but still appear to be enough to remove your right to liberty.Sheeesh! Your right to liberty has so many caveats, it looks like a politician devised it. Shall we keep going?
I can provide more breaches and you can add more criteria.
Eventually your right to liberty has been cut back until it barely applies to anyone.So... Well, all those conditions excludes liberty.
Let's look at property next...Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Well, clearly you are struggling with it. You claimed that the right to liberty was unconditional....which is shown to be very wrong:
The right of liberty is the right to stay out of prison if you have not interfered with the liberties of others, or broken an unspecified social contract or violated other peoples' rights or do certain other things that don't break any of the previous rules but still appear to be enough to remove your right to liberty. Fascinating.
Anyway, back to what I actually wrote:
All those conditions exclude liberty as an unconditional human right.You have 'inalienable' rights being taken away.
You have 'unconditional' rights with numerous restrictions.
Look: if you don't know what a word means then stop using it.