Is truth or evidence more important in science and evolution?

Define truth.Do you think somehow something has shone this truth to you?I think you are trying to conflate two words that have vastly different meanings.I for one to not think there is any higher 'truth". Using the word truth in the manner you are of course.I would really like to hear some of this "truth" of which you speak.Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.Edited by Theodoric, : Need to be nicer so removed subtitle

Word salad.
In other words subjective "evidence " is more valid than objective evidence"?You are defining with more woo terms.
Define "validated evidence".Science has nothing to do with this "truth" you mention. And amazingly someone else will find a different "truth" than you. Hardly makes it a truth i would think. How did this "God" reveal this truth to you? Did anyone else see it?

Care to address my questions?
Message 19
Please tell us what you mean by 'truth", without using word salad and woo. It should be quite easy for you to define it since you are so confident in its existence. If you are unable to define so others can understand it then it probably is just some subjective crap.Define "validated evidence". You tried to say this was your definition of 'truth", but unless you further define this then your definition is meaningless.How did this "God" reveal this truth to you? Did anyone else see it?Patiently waiting.

Word salad.I see you continue to refuse to answer my questions. Guess that means that ll you have is mumbo-jumbo and woo.Maybe you can reread my two previous posts and actually address them instead of just spouting more bullshit.
Message 43
Message 19 This sentence means nothing.