Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,871 Year: 4,128/9,624 Month: 999/974 Week: 326/286 Day: 47/40 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution versus Creationism is a 'Red Herring' argument
PaulGL
Member (Idle past 3415 days)
Posts: 92
Joined: 04-06-2012


Message 1 of 10 (661541)
05-07-2012 5:12 PM


I choose: "Evolution versus Creationism, et all is a 'Red Herring' argument due to misunderstanding on both sides"
I cannot thank you enough for your informed and cogent help.
PaulGL
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Changed topic title from "I choose: "Evolution versus 'Creationism, et. al.' is a 'Red Herring' argument due to" to "Evolution versus Creationism is a 'Red Herring' argument".

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 05-08-2012 8:07 AM PaulGL has replied
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-25-2012 12:43 AM PaulGL has replied

PaulGL
Member (Idle past 3415 days)
Posts: 92
Joined: 04-06-2012


Message 4 of 10 (663884)
05-27-2012 1:51 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Adminnemooseus
05-25-2012 12:43 AM


Re: Bump (and a reference to another PNT)
Sorry, admin. For some reason my email notifications got cut off, and I didn't realize any of this was happening. Will change/check settings to rectify.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-25-2012 12:43 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

PaulGL
Member (Idle past 3415 days)
Posts: 92
Joined: 04-06-2012


Message 5 of 10 (663885)
05-27-2012 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
05-08-2012 8:07 AM


Percy: I'll have to get back to you on that, but within 10 days- since my email notifications are now back on (I hope). I had to ditch my 7-year old PC and get another. Rather than transfer my bacup, the PC store put my old hard drive in the new PC also. But I just found that it won't access those files. Will be knocking on their door Tuesday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 05-08-2012 8:07 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

PaulGL
Member (Idle past 3415 days)
Posts: 92
Joined: 04-06-2012


Message 6 of 10 (663886)
05-27-2012 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
05-08-2012 8:07 AM


Evolution was, in its conception, an applied extension to biology of the school of thought known as uniformitarianism. Evolution itself is a logical explanation of the information that it correlates, and the evidence of the appropriate scientific fields has consistently verified the mechanisms necessary for substantiating the validity of evolution. Evolution, while it is not a proven process in the strictest sense, is completely valid in its viability and is the only logical process (i.e., one amenable to scientific analysis) so tenable.
The human error in the promotion and promulgation of evolution was, and still is, of two aspects: Firstly, as we shall see later on in this chapter, the school of thought that gave rise to the theory of evolution- Uniformitarianism﷓ is totally in contradiction to scientific evidence. Uniformitarianism was founded on insufficient and incomplete data, and the motives for its adoption were more anti﷓Genesis than they were pro﷓scientific.
The second mistake, resulting from the same anti﷓spiritual motivation as the first, was in the use of evolution as one pillar of a mechanistic explanation capable of circumventing the problem of first cause, i.e., the origination of everything. Evolution is merely a process and is not an explanation of actual creation; the explanation of creation per se does not lie within the realm of scientific explanation.
The validity of evolution would not, in the slightest degree, diminish the evidential necessity of the existence of God, nor would it preclude the validity of divine creation.
Evolutionists for nonscientific reasons have erroneously discarded the Genesis account and, equally erroneously, religionists have discarded evolution as being contradictory to a Genesis account.
Now it is time to logically examine the merits and foibles of the "pro-Creation" argument.
To promote the literality of the six days of restoration makes equally as much sense as the Roman Catholic Church's defense of the earth as the center of the universe in the time of Copernicus. It is theologically incorrect to think that the 6 days were literal 24-hour days, since time elements (lights) were not assigned until the 4th day. The damage done by such misguided, and scripturally mistaken believers, in making Christians appear to be ignorant and illogical people, has been inestimable. What would cause some of the better scientific minds of the last century to illogically jump to conclusions in a frenzied effort to discredit the Bible in general and Genesis in particular? What would cause religious people to feel compelled to attack evolution as if they were defending the Faith? The answer to these questions is obvious if we rephrase them with the word who instead of what. Who has always endeavored to cause the human race to strain out a gnat and swallow a camel? None other than our most subtle enemy, Satan.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 05-08-2012 8:07 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 05-29-2012 8:58 AM PaulGL has replied

PaulGL
Member (Idle past 3415 days)
Posts: 92
Joined: 04-06-2012


Message 8 of 10 (665176)
06-09-2012 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Admin
05-29-2012 8:58 AM


reply to "cut n paste"
I wrote A Message for the Human Race. The 'cut and pastes' are my commentary on specific footnoted material validating the concepts elucidated. Do forum rules require that I re-phrase my own commentary, probably to a less cogent version?
Also, am going to check my 'murphy's law' email notification setting, since I didn't receive notification of any forum/thread/replies.
PaulGL aka achristian1985

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 05-29-2012 8:58 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Admin, posted 06-10-2012 7:43 AM PaulGL has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024