Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0

The complaints about Artemis Entreri and his responses here have been noted. Please post no more messages about this specific problem to this thread.

You go gurl! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!- Oni

Message 1{Done - Adminnemooseus}Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

Message 265No explination from me needed, this BS was in a science forum.abe Message 267 Full rant mode ......check. Loss of self control....check.ABE That was a PM from FY, very childish.Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.Edited by fearandloathing, : No reason given.

new member asdf123

New member asdf123 has also been busily voting down replies to foreveryoung and other messages.

asdf123* is just foreveryoung.I guess he's allowed to lurk and jeer while suspended. I have no real problem with that.

Message 1

Message 1Spam, densely packed and unreadable, but stinky nonetheless.

If this doesn't merit a suspension, then virtually nothing does:javascript:void(0)EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Big Bang and Cosmology ⇒ Creation cosmology and the Big BangMessage 227 of 232 (666354)
06-26-2012 11:53 PM

So an evolutionist who posts for the sole purpose of calling someone a babbling idiot gets one a 24 hour suspension, but a creationist supposedly being off topic on a science post gets a one month, or else a permanent ban from posting in certain topics?Any wonder where so few creationists bother here?

Its all about how much rule breaking happens. Once or twice here and there is no big deal, but if you cannot ever not break the rules, then you gotta go.

You are commended for reporting a problematic post in the correct thread, but this really belongs over at General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List').I looked back at Panda's suspension record and noted that he received a 12 hour suspension back in September. Since he has not been a problem poster, but since he had recently received moderator action I decided to suspend for 24 hours without notice.Foreveryoung had received two suspensions in April, one for the delightful 'go fuck yourself' and had been problematic without suspension in other places. It was because short term suspensions were clearly not working to bring foreveryoung back into line.If you have anything else you want to say, say it over at General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List'). Do not reply to this post or you may find yourself getting a suspension as well.Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.

Message 1And a REALLY INCOMPETENT ONE AS WELL.

Unpaid Work For The UnemployedMessage 234
Crashfrog has more or less decided to dedicate a whole post to his claims of my dishonesty. It seems as though he intends to discuss nothing else for the remainder of the discussion until I promise to stop it.Likewise, I feel strongly motivated to defend against charges of dishonesty when made in a public forum. So I'm not going to stop the argument either.I'm thinking this might warrant moderator attention. Either an enforced stop of the meta-debate and the charges of dishonesty or a move of the thread to Free For All would seem appropriate to me. Though I will abide by the decision of whoever looks into it. I do however, have one request: I assert a right of reply. As the accused, I think the fairest ruling would allow me the 'last word'. If, for example, crashfrog is allowed to put forward his best case for my dishonesty (or perhaps if he replies before moderator intervention occurs), which I am content with him so doing, I will present my rebuttal and we can call it a day.I am aware it's the coffee house and everything, but I'm thinking there are limits and someone might judge this to have gone beyond them.Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.