General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')

..and I will be here all week, don't forget to tip those waitresses, bada baam! Absolute MOR-ONS! ha haaa.Seriously though Onifre, what do you do for a living?

Percy,Your statement right there makes it pretty clear that you are incapable of being a moderator. A moderator doesn't have an agenda, doesn't take sides, doesn't have a pro-conceived idea about who is going to be right and who is going to be wrong and doesn't say some rules aren't necessary if I think you are wrong.You have just used the excuse that it is reasonable that Dr. A uses personal insults, because well, you think Faith is wrong, and you also think your side has the science to back it.Even granting you the most friendly interpretation of the facts, you would be incredibly wrong to make this statement as a moderator. But what's even worse for you is even your facts are wrong. Her theory is no less scientifically verified than is the great theory you proselytize. So you not only don't posses the basic requirements of a moderator in any environment which would even pretend to be anything more than propaganda, you don't even have the excuse of science to hide behind.

Oni,It was a JOKE, about drug use! There was a smilie face for crying out loud!!Did you actually believe Dr. A when he was trying to post his propaganda that I had insulted you? If that's the case, you really MUST be high!That's a joke, a JOKE! Take it easy. I mean, not the part about Dr. A being a deceitful* propagandist of course, but yea, the rest.*(I am not sure if I can use the word deceitf@l here either. Percy is also a propagandist, you see. Jack booted thugs will be at my door anytime now, so sorry, no more time for more smilie faces, I have to run quick...).

How is it that Admin (you know the impartial referee guy, who also devises strategies to convince all the fence sitters lurking here) has allowed the the Origin of Novelty discussion (in which evolutionists seem incapable of describing any coherent theory from the onset) to spiral completely off topic for page after page after page?It could be he never noticed-although since he noticed that I was off topic three times he claims and suspended me, who started the thread, that would seem unlikely. Another possibility is that he is incompetent. Or the third possibility is that it is intentional, to divert away from the fact that the evolutionists side can't argue this topic well. I wonder which it is.I guess if one is being very generous and un-skeptical, they could believe its incompetency. Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.Edited by Bolder-dash, : No reason given.

But is it on topic?Because if there is one thing we all know, its that Percy is a real stickler for being on topic.

Bluegenes,
Interesting point Bluegenes, that you don't feel that you to provide convincing evidence for your theory, but rather put the onus on the other side to debunk evidence that doesn't even exist.But back to the point of THIS thread.So you do agree then, that its rather telling of Percy to conveniently disregard off topic posts which derail a thread-when it suits his purposes of interference; while he is very diligent about invoking threats of suspension very quickly, when it is more advantageous for him to silence damaging critiques of his theory.I realize its business as usual here, but it worthwhile that at least we all know this is the case. The fence sitters can also probably see this pretty clearly by now. But its good to remind then again once in a while.You never know when new people are going to come to this site actually expecting that its a debate site, rather than a propaganda site disguised as debate.

Nosy says my last rely to you on Wasteful Intelligent Design was unnecessary. He just may be right. But then again, you like playing in the mud so much, I figured you would enjoy, after someone tells you what it meant of course.