Back when I was in college, I had a professor that was a Hebrew scholar. He was my ethics professor, actually. You could say he was the mentor who changed my mind about homosexuals.
Anyway, in one of our many discussions, he told me that after years of studying the old testament, he had become convinced that a lot of it was man's inability to understand god adequately. Now, remember that he was a true believer in god.
He pointed out to me that there were sections in the old testament where god outright commanded the israelites to slaughter entire civilizations. But then after those sections, god began to stop commanding outright and started negotiating as well as sending prophets. I used to be able to track down all the examples. This was back when I was still studying the bible very intensely.
The point is my ethics professor believed that whatever god commanded the isralites to do it sure as hell wasn't to kill every man, woman, and child of entire cities like Jericho. After a while, god realized that the barbarians kept misunderstanding his commands, and so he started talking to them and sending prophets to make the communications earlier instead of sending them commands that kept getting misinterpreted.
This might be worth pursuing? After all, if you believe in the literal interpretation of the bible, you will have to accept that killing every man, woman, and child of a city to rob it of gold, silver, and brass is morally right. And don't even think you can weasel your way out of this.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning