Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 61/28 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationist experiment to prove the possibility of Noah's ark
ringo
Member (Idle past 402 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 94 of 115 (613784)
04-27-2011 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Minnemooseus
04-27-2011 1:23 AM


Re: The "robot monkey" hypothesis isn't needed
Minnemooseus writes:
What problems can't be overcome by the practical application of miracles?
I try to point out to floodists that God made Noah build his own ark - i.e. Noah was responsible for his own safety. "God did it," might be a convenient catch-all explanation, but that isn't the way the Bible tells it.

If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Minnemooseus, posted 04-27-2011 1:23 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 402 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(1)
Message 106 of 115 (670071)
08-08-2012 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by mram10
08-07-2012 7:34 PM


Re: The Biblical Flood never happened.
mram10 writes:
My point is this: people that posted in this thread, brought up numerous arguments that were contrary to the biblical account.
In fact, it's creationists who mangle the Biblical account in an attempt to make it fit reality. The whole idea of rapid microevolution seems to have been made up to avoid fitting all of the animals o the ark. The violence of the flood, the uplifting of the mountains and the "vapour canopy" nonsense are all unbiblical.
The proposed experiment would certainly be interesting, whether it "succeeded" or not. But the major obstacle is likely to be Christians' inability to agree on "what the Bible says".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by mram10, posted 08-07-2012 7:34 PM mram10 has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024