Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9047 total)
89 online now:
PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat) (2 members, 87 visitors)
Newest Member: Wes johnson
Post Volume: Total: 887,572 Year: 5,218/14,102 Month: 139/677 Week: 24/90 Day: 0/1 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   August 2012 - Post of the Month
Posts: 3849
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001

Message 2 of 7 (670183)
08-09-2012 9:53 PM

marc9000, at "I Am Not An Atheist!"
Author: marc9000
Forum: Creation/Evolution Miscellany
Thread: Author: I Am Not An Atheist!
Message #: 303, with honorable mentions for the following messages 304 and 305

I find message 303 as being exceptionally well done, and the other two also being pretty good.


Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.

"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham

"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith

"Yesterday on Fox News, commentator Glenn Beck said that he believes President Obama is a racist. To be fair, every time you watch Glenn Beck, it does get a little easier to hate white people." - Conan O'Brien

"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-09-2012 10:15 PM Minnemooseus has not yet responded
 Message 4 by NoNukes, posted 08-10-2012 11:44 AM Minnemooseus has responded

Posts: 3849
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001

Message 5 of 7 (670243)
08-10-2012 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by NoNukes
08-10-2012 11:44 AM

Re: marc9000, at "I Am Not An Atheist!"
A reply from both Moose modes:

My nomination is totally sincere - It's not snark. I think there is substantial on-topic material there.


Unfortunately, it has led to discussion of such things as the general merits of the intelligent design concept, rather than such things as the relationship between deism and the intelligent design concept. As I see it, the first is off-topic while the second is on-topic. All messages there should have some explicit connection to deism.


PLEASE, NO REPLIES TO THIS TOPIC. Go to "The Whine List" if you wish to dispute my position. Members can respond to my message 2, IF they wish to second the nomination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by NoNukes, posted 08-10-2012 11:44 AM NoNukes has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021