for tc (coral cores)

you seem to be fond of doubting CORROBORATED dating methods, and then use this doubt as proof of creationismhere are a few to tackle1. coral cores (they go back as long as 40000 years)2. ancient geneology (the bible is a find reference, but those stupid, unhygenic egyptians, now they were unreliable)3. ancient refernces to eclipses (cultures would record eclipses, and we would go back and find the eclipses occured thousands of years ago, far beyond the estimated date of the flood.4. corroborationex. we take the ancient recording of the eclipse. we find the date of the eclipse. we then find that the culture recorded that a pharoah had died shortly after the eclipse, and they were building a pyramid for him... we then have reason to believe that the pyramids were built so-and-so years ago.so maybe you could explain how every dating method corroborates and rarely, if ever, diverges. if you don't have an answer, then find one5. and maybe you could explain how we have never found a dating method that indicates the planet is 10000 years old or less.

here is another link that briefly explains the concept of coral cores.I dare you to prove that the dates on coral cores are being misinterpreted, and that coral cores truly indicate the earth is 10,000 years old.

here is another link that briefly explains the concept of coral cores. http://my.erinet.com/~jwoolf/rad_dat.htmlI dare you to prove that the dates on coral cores are being misinterpreted, and that coral cores truly indicate the earth is 10,000 years old.

and just one more moment-

quote:

---

10. C-14 dating methods have also been checked against coral reefs, and by air samples trapped in ice cores.

---

that quote was from
http://www.nightskypix.com/radiometric.htmthis can all be found by "searching the page" with the word "coral".and here is one final link that I think should be addressed... http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/wise.htm