Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,456 Year: 3,713/9,624 Month: 584/974 Week: 197/276 Day: 37/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How novel features evolve #2
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 189 of 402 (672636)
09-10-2012 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by zi ko
09-10-2012 7:53 AM


Re: guidance vs selection
Hi zi ko,
... Thus the directed part of the evolution would have to be in manipulation of the ecological environment, yes?
I suppose i can agree with above. Is there something more after that?
The formation of novel traits, which begins the process of increasing the diversity within living species, that leads to phyletic speciation, and can lead to divergent speciation and the increase in the diversity of species on earth:
quote:
(From my proposed thread Introduction to Evolution, Message 1): If we look at the continued effects of evolution over many generations, the accumulation of changes from generation to generation may become sufficient for individuals to develop combinations of traits that are observably different from the ancestral parent population. This lineal change within species is sometimes called phyletic change in species, or phyletic speciation. This is also sometimes called arbitrary speciation in that the place to draw the line between linearly evolved genealogical populations is subjective, and because the definition of species in general is tentative and sometimes arbitrary.
...
(2) The process of divergent speciation involves the division of a parent population into two or more reproductively isolated daughter populations, which then are free to (micro) evolve independently of each other.
The reduction or loss of interbreeding (gene flow, sharing of mutations) between the sub-populations results in different evolutionary responses within the separated sub-populations, each then responds independently to their different ecological challenges and opportunities, and this leads to divergence of hereditary traits between the subpopulations and the frequency of their distributions within the sub-populations.
Over generations phyletic change occurs in these populations, the responses to different ecologies accumulate into differences between the hereditary traits available within each of the daughter populations, and when these differences have reached a critical level, such that interbreeding no longer occurs, then the formation of new species is deemed to have occurred. After this has occurred each daughter population microevolves independently of the other/s. These are often called speciation events because the development of species is not arbitrary in this process.
If we looked at each branch linearly, while ignoring the sister population, they would show phyletic change in species (accumulation of evolutionary changes over many generations), and this shows that the same basic processes of evolution within breeding populations are involved in each branch.
The "the accumulation of changes from generation to generation may become sufficient for individuals to develop combinations of traits that are observably different from the ancestral parent population" is the formation of novel traits, the topic of this thread.
Remember that mutations affect the genotype and selection (ecological or sexual) operates on the phenotype (the expressed traits of the individuals), that it is a two-step dance, and not just hopping along on one leg.
Isn't this just selection?
Ithink it is both. Selection and guided mutations.
And I can agree with that, as working hypothesis.
It has always seemed to me that evolution just shows the how of the process: that science, in general does not, cannot, really address the whys (purpose\causal\intent), because of the way science is formulated -- not because there is any intended attempt to eliminate it from science, philosophical or theistic consideration, but because science is just not capable of addressing those issues.
Enjoy
Edited by RAZD, : format
Edited by RAZD, : more format
Edited by RAZD, : clrty

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by zi ko, posted 09-10-2012 7:53 AM zi ko has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by zi ko, posted 09-10-2012 11:06 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 196 of 402 (672704)
09-10-2012 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by zi ko
09-10-2012 11:06 AM


Re: guidance vs selection
Hi zi ko,
I Think i could easily use this text to describe the mechanism of how "guided mutations" work in producing evolution! May i?
Yes, but you will need to start a new thread for it, that would not add to the debate here and my thread has not been (and not likely to be) opened for discussion (admin and I are considering different or new options for this kind of thread).
I fully subscribe.My "guided mutations' doesn't intend to bring about
Supernatural intervention.It seems to me a clearly scientific issue, though very much complicated, involving high and maybe unknoun yet level of biochemistry in relation to simplistic concept of random mutations.
And this would be discussed on your new thread, yes? I'd be interested, if you choose that path.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by zi ko, posted 09-10-2012 11:06 AM zi ko has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 197 of 402 (672705)
09-10-2012 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Tangle
09-10-2012 10:20 AM


how about a review of where we are?
Hi Tangle,
How about a review of where we got to on the lizards and mice, what the problems were, and maybe some suggestions of where to go.
This would be a reinstatement of the topic to bring it back in line, and then Percy can enforce strict adherence to that statement.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Tangle, posted 09-10-2012 10:20 AM Tangle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024