Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9072 total)
56 online now:
(56 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Post Volume: Total: 893,163 Year: 4,275/6,534 Month: 489/900 Week: 13/182 Day: 1/12 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   for tc (coral cores)
quicksink
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 4 (6375)
03-09-2002 4:19 AM


you seem to be fond of doubting CORROBORATED dating methods, and then use this doubt as proof of creationism

here are a few to tackle

1. coral cores (they go back as long as 40000 years)

2. ancient geneology (the bible is a find reference, but those stupid, unhygenic egyptians, now they were unreliable)

3. ancient refernces to eclipses (cultures would record eclipses, and we would go back and find the eclipses occured thousands of years ago, far beyond the estimated date of the flood.

4. corroboration

ex. we take the ancient recording of the eclipse. we find the date of the eclipse. we then find that the culture recorded that a pharoah had died shortly after the eclipse, and they were building a pyramid for him... we then have reason to believe that the pyramids were built so-and-so years ago.

so maybe you could explain how every dating method corroborates and rarely, if ever, diverges. if you don't have an answer, then find one

5. and maybe you could explain how we have never found a dating method that indicates the planet is 10000 years old or less.


Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by quicksink, posted 03-13-2002 3:57 AM quicksink has taken no action

  
quicksink
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 4 (6726)
03-13-2002 3:53 AM


here is another link that briefly explains the concept of coral cores.

I dare you to prove that the dates on coral cores are being misinterpreted, and that coral cores truly indicate the earth is 10,000 years old.


  
quicksink
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 4 (6727)
03-13-2002 3:53 AM


here is another link that briefly explains the concept of coral cores.

http://my.erinet.com/~jwoolf/rad_dat.html

I dare you to prove that the dates on coral cores are being misinterpreted, and that coral cores truly indicate the earth is 10,000 years old.


  
quicksink
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 4 (6728)
03-13-2002 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by quicksink
03-09-2002 4:19 AM


and just one more moment-

quote:
10. C-14 dating methods have also been checked against coral reefs, and by air samples trapped in ice cores.

that quote was from
http://www.nightskypix.com/radiometric.htm

this can all be found by "searching the page" with the word "coral".

and here is one final link that I think should be addressed...

http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/wise.htm


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by quicksink, posted 03-09-2002 4:19 AM quicksink has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022