Summations Only

Do you have any evidence to support either of those assertions?And are either of them even relevant?

I assume you have evidence to support that panda or anyone else in this thread advocated the US government murder children, or murder anyone for that matter?

It's interesting when I see empty vacuous phrases like "the cause of 9/11" thrown around.Let's look at what lead up to 9-11 that might have involved the US.Iraq invaded a neighboring Nation State and the US was asked to help free that Nation State, stationed troops in Saudi Arabia to do that with the full support of the Saudi Government and under mandate from the United Nations to free Kuwait.After a long period of attempted negotiation to try to avoid a battle, it became clear that there was no chance for peaceful resolution, invaded to drive back Iraq forces from Kuwait.After a short battle the US and its allies succeeded in freeing Kuwait and showed restraint by NOT continuing on to overthrow the government of Iraq or attack major Iraqi cities and infrastructure.Again, under UN mandate, supported and maintained a quarantine of Iraq to prevent the ruler of Iraq from carrying out his threats against the surrounding Nation States.Where are the asserted "criminal acts"?

Sorry but that is way beyond our capability. We cannot give the military the right to arrest anyone not already within US jurisdiction.

That is something that is legal.But don't try to tell me what I think. Deal with YOUR position, I'll take care of my position.

There is no one right or wrong answer. Each incident is unique and individual and the decision of right or wrong will depend on the threat, costs and reward in that particular incident.

But the same answer applies to the question of morality; there is no single moral or immoral answer available except on an individual case by case basis. The media often applies terms incorrectly and so that is totally irrelevant.Your example is also totally irrelevant to the issue of US drone attacks. It might be relevant if the US were carrying out drone attacks in England or France or Italy or Germany or Canada or Japan or any other nation where there is a reasonable expectation of rule of law. That is not the case.

That's a pretty vacuous assertion and so irrelevant.Murder is not synonymous with morality. Murder is a purely legal term. No, it shows sloppy thinking and word usage. The US and Iran are currently in a State of Belligerency and so that should be considered an Act of War by one Nation State against another Nation State.The US and Pakistan are NOT in a State of Belligerency.It is still irrelevant.Edited by jar, : fix end quote