Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Civilized man was killed by a bullet from a pistol in the age of dinosaurs
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 46 of 89 (675004)
10-05-2012 1:00 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 11:04 PM


quote:
The matter should be referred for geophysicists and astrophysicists.
Geophysicists say that there are different processes of formation of granite and the transformation through of the magma - not necessarily the way to go. Astrophysicists say that on Earth and in space there is nothing ancient than granite!
  —valentin.d
Doesn't make sense at all, but what do you think geologists do for a living, valentin.d? Just study beer brewing?
I really struggle to figure out what you have to say in the next part of your post, so I won't comment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 11:04 PM valentin.d has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 89 (675006)
10-05-2012 1:29 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 11:04 PM


According to the fossil different organisms Geophysics try determine the origin of many minerals and rocks of the Earth's crust, but categorically rejected probability of the existence of all types of organisms and at all times with the constant change in their numbers under the influence of a cataclysms.
That is what is at the core delusion geophysicists and geochemists in the process of determining the age of fossils!
You're wrong and you're insane. Is there any way at all that I could show you that fact?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 11:04 PM valentin.d has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 48 of 89 (675009)
10-05-2012 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by onifre
10-03-2012 11:42 PM


He said civilized not British.
A distinction without a difference.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by onifre, posted 10-03-2012 11:42 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by onifre, posted 10-05-2012 7:05 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 49 of 89 (675010)
10-05-2012 2:10 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 11:04 PM


Look, valentin. Let me explain something to you.
This is the fossilized skull of a dinosaur.
And this is what scientists technically refer to as "a rock".
Do you see the difference?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 11:04 PM valentin.d has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by valentin.d, posted 10-05-2012 5:33 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
valentin.d
Member (Idle past 3517 days)
Posts: 44
From: Moscow
Joined: 09-17-2009


Message 50 of 89 (675012)
10-05-2012 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Dr Adequate
10-05-2012 2:10 AM


Evolution and Human Origins, civilization, fossils, paleontology, Homo sapiens.
Dr Adequate
I understand, without explanation, that the plastic skull, made by you at the top.
From below: head of this dinosaur turned into a stone which I found in the vicinity of Moscow, you took from my album.
Edited by valentin.d, : No reason given.
Edited by valentin.d, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-05-2012 2:10 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Pressie, posted 10-05-2012 6:01 AM valentin.d has not replied
 Message 69 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-10-2012 12:09 PM valentin.d has replied

  
Pressie
Member
Posts: 2103
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010


Message 51 of 89 (675013)
10-05-2012 6:01 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by valentin.d
10-05-2012 5:33 AM


Re: Evolution and Human Origins, civilization, fossils, paleontology, Homo sapiens.
I really, really hope that you're just a POE.
Edited by Pressie, : Spelled really as reely before the comma!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by valentin.d, posted 10-05-2012 5:33 AM valentin.d has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by herebedragons, posted 10-05-2012 8:40 AM Pressie has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2295 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 52 of 89 (675014)
10-05-2012 6:17 AM


Now now guys...
I think you're being to harsh on the guy.
Just the other day I even found the fossilized bullet that killed this man. Right in my back yard!
Amazing, I know, here it is:
Clearly fossilized bullet from gun that kill ancient prehistoric dinosaur man.
New science is exciting!

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by valentin.d, posted 10-10-2012 7:02 AM Huntard has not replied
 Message 67 by rueh, posted 10-10-2012 10:45 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 53 of 89 (675019)
10-05-2012 7:59 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 3:51 PM


My question was, "How do you know it as a pistol shot without the bullet? And how would you distiguish the entry/exit wounds of a bullet from, say, an arrow?
Experts can easily identify species of firearms, even in the absence of a bullet.
So which experts have examined this and have identified it as a pistol shot?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 3:51 PM valentin.d has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by herebedragons, posted 10-05-2012 8:50 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied
 Message 62 by valentin.d, posted 10-10-2012 6:07 AM Modulous has replied

  
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


Message 54 of 89 (675022)
10-05-2012 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Pressie
10-05-2012 6:01 AM


POE or nuts? I vote nuts!
I really, really hope that you're just a POE.
I don't think so ... it seems more like these claims by Question Evolution! have really shook the evolutionary tree and all the nuts fell out. Or is it just a coincident that there has been an influx of people with really, really far out ideas?
HBD
Edited by herebedragons, : No reason given.

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for. But until the end of the present exile has come and terminated this our imperfection by which "we know in part," I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Pressie, posted 10-05-2012 6:01 AM Pressie has not replied

  
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 857 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


Message 55 of 89 (675024)
10-05-2012 8:50 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Modulous
10-05-2012 7:59 AM


Its so obvious that he figured it out all by himself in just an hour and a half in that quarry!
HBD

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for. But until the end of the present exile has come and terminated this our imperfection by which "we know in part," I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Modulous, posted 10-05-2012 7:59 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by valentin.d, posted 10-10-2012 10:33 AM herebedragons has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 411 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 56 of 89 (675082)
10-05-2012 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by valentin.d
10-04-2012 3:51 PM


valentin.d writes:
Experts can easily identify species of firearms, even in the absence of a bullet.
As far as I know, forensic experts can only estimate the caliber of a bullet that caused a wound yesterday. A hole in an ancient fossilized skull would be eroded, etc. so that even an estimate would probably not be possible. As for identifying "species" of firearm, you need something like a bullet or a cartridge casing. A hole just doen't give enough information.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by valentin.d, posted 10-04-2012 3:51 PM valentin.d has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by valentin.d, posted 10-10-2012 11:07 PM ringo has not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8513
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 5.3


(2)
Message 57 of 89 (675088)
10-05-2012 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by valentin.d
10-03-2012 11:32 AM


Re: OK, I guess we'll go for the yucks
Hey Val, You wouldn't happen to be from Montreal, would you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by valentin.d, posted 10-03-2012 11:32 AM valentin.d has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2950 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 58 of 89 (675107)
10-05-2012 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Dr Adequate
10-05-2012 1:59 AM


A distinction without a difference.
Oh yeah right, those civilized brits.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-05-2012 1:59 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Tangle, posted 10-06-2012 4:09 AM onifre has not replied
 Message 60 by Larni, posted 10-07-2012 2:27 PM onifre has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9489
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 59 of 89 (675118)
10-06-2012 4:09 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by onifre
10-05-2012 7:05 PM


Obviously we exclude the Queen as she's mostly German.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by onifre, posted 10-05-2012 7:05 PM onifre has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 60 of 89 (675180)
10-07-2012 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by onifre
10-05-2012 7:05 PM


A legitimate piece of street theatre.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by onifre, posted 10-05-2012 7:05 PM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024