Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,581 Year: 2,838/9,624 Month: 683/1,588 Week: 89/229 Day: 0/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Simplest Protein of Life
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 196 of 281 (676346)
10-22-2012 3:38 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by ICANT
10-22-2012 12:31 AM


Re: New information
Of course there is information in a snow flake.
Look at one side of a snow flake: now you know what the other side looks like.
Can you really be this set in your ways? Children understand this.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by ICANT, posted 10-22-2012 12:31 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by ICANT, posted 10-22-2012 12:32 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 203 of 281 (676361)
10-22-2012 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by ICANT
10-22-2012 12:32 PM


Re: New information
Snow flakes are symetrical. If you know what one side looks like you now have information about the other side.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by ICANT, posted 10-22-2012 12:32 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by ICANT, posted 10-22-2012 1:02 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 210 of 281 (676371)
10-22-2012 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by ICANT
10-22-2012 1:02 PM


Re: New information
You don't have have 100% accuracy to be information. It is still information.
See?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by ICANT, posted 10-22-2012 1:02 PM ICANT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by Stile, posted 10-23-2012 2:00 PM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 224 of 281 (676465)
10-23-2012 3:29 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-23-2012 1:37 AM


Re: Anything to say about the topic?
I must admit, Percy, that I am well and truly puzzled by the whole thing. I've no facile explanation. Any death escaping machine is a mind-boggling structure. The cat got no clue.
Kindly stop posting rubbish, then.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-23-2012 1:37 AM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-23-2012 9:33 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 228 of 281 (676495)
10-23-2012 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 225 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-23-2012 9:33 AM


No, you said that you have no clue about death avoiding machines which in my wildest imaginations I interpret as living organisms.
So, you have no clue about living organisms? Well that's fine: I have no clue about quantum physics. Consequently I don't pontificate about it with an air of smug self satisfaction. That's what I don't do.
That is why you should not contribute to this thread.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-23-2012 9:33 AM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-23-2012 4:00 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 246 of 281 (676593)
10-24-2012 3:19 AM
Reply to: Message 234 by Alfred Maddenstein
10-23-2012 4:00 PM


Where have I cheated?
Why do you hate science?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 10-23-2012 4:00 PM Alfred Maddenstein has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 154 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 281 of 281 (725255)
04-25-2014 5:05 AM
Reply to: Message 253 by Ed67
04-23-2014 9:34 AM


Wow. This guy was bang on. No wonder you guys got rid of him LOL
This poster made two posts and did not return. It is disingenuous to suggest he was 'got rid of' by the persons you were addressing.
I think you are asking interesting questions and I'm enjoying the discourse generated by your posts.
There are few enough people on this board who challenge ToE so I hope you can both stay and rise above making such statements.
All the best.
Edited by Larni, : DVD extras

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by Ed67, posted 04-23-2014 9:34 AM Ed67 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024