Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Yet another Congressman who doesn't accept the theory of evolution
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 48 of 231 (675992)
10-18-2012 8:13 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by dwise1
10-18-2012 4:55 AM


Re: Mainstream Media? Really?
That sentiment is so alien that it is difficult for the mind to even begin to comprehend.
What, really? No, look, it's simple:
"Fucking bitches, trying to get one over on me. I'll show 'em."
It's the easiest thing in the world to understand. You just have to disable your humanity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by dwise1, posted 10-18-2012 4:55 AM dwise1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by dwise1, posted 10-18-2012 10:44 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(6)
Message 212 of 231 (677264)
10-28-2012 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by foreveryoung
10-28-2012 2:00 PM


You shouldn't necessarily stop believing something because all of the evidence shows your belief to be false.
Yeah, you pretty much should.
There is something to be said for intuition.
No, there's nothing to be said for it. Intuition isn't a magic sixth sense, it's how cognitive biases in your mind manifest. They make you "feel" like some things are true regardless of whether they are or not.
If we stopped believing something because all of the evidence shows the belief to be false, then there would be times when not all the evidence was available and when that evidence did become available, our belief would turn out to be vindicated.
So? The point of knowledge isn't to be right every single time, or to get ahead of the evidence so that you can turn out to have been right before everybody else. It's not to be "loyal" to ideas and not betray them - they're ideas, they don't care whether we're fair-weather friends or not. The point of knowledge and evidence is to hold the most defensible position at any point in time, based on what is known at that point in time. When the state of knowledge changes, you should change with it.
Now, maybe you're thinking "but, if I did it that way, I'd be wrong a lot! I'd have to change my mind about stuff when I learned new things, and I might even have to admit I was wrong!" Well, yes. But what's wrong with doing any of that? Especially when you stand to gain so much in terms of an accurate understanding of what's going on around you?
Knowing and understanding how things work is incredibly powerful. It gives you an unparalleled ability to influence other people, to change the world around you, to solve problems and reduce suffering - or to cause it, if that's your deal. I would prefer people use their knowledge for the betterment of those around them, but the truth is, the power of being a fair-weather friend to ideas is vast regardless of whether it's used for good or ill. You should ask yourself why you would want to close yourself off to that power for nothing more than loyalty to something - an idea - that can't know whether you ever were, or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by foreveryoung, posted 10-28-2012 2:00 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024