I'm not in my role as moderator - I'm just a participant trying to have a discussion about the topic. It's just a Coffee House thread. My introductory post wasn't meant to be interpreted so strictly.
Well, NoNukes is also an ordinary participant who is not posting as a moderator, so I guess I'll leave it up to him how strictly we should interpret his introductory post. It's just a Coffee House thread, as you so rightly point out.
Given this latitude, I think I'm more on-topic seriously replying to foreveryoung's post in the thread in which he posted it than replying to it in a thread in which he didn't post it but which for some reason the administrator of these forums has set up for the sole purpose of dogpiling on one member. I do not in fact want to argue with him about whether he's a good Christian, I want to talk about how people should respond to evidence, a question which is in fact central to
this thread.