These people are so convinced that carbon dioxide is the culprit for recent warming and for all past warming that it is impossible for them to consider otherwise.
There you go again with your of hand dismissal of perspectives that don't conform with your own.
The other sources of heat come from within the earth and from the sun. If you were to pull enough carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere to where it was just 270 ppm, what would the temperature of the earth be. Once you give me that figure, can you tell me how you arrived at it?
Why don't you do the work yourself? Clearly anyone else has already be indoctrinated to a preconceived world view.
It doesn't because doctors who have gone to medical school are not pushing an agenda.
How can you be so naive? Half the doctors are in the pocket of Big Pharma, the other half have directorships in elective surgery clinics (that they refere patients to) and the remaining half are too busy feathering their own nests to keep up with the state of the art.
You are very trusting, mate.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
