About New Lamarckian Synthesis Theory

My conclusions are independed and maybe different from auhors conclusions. They don't take into account the possibility of guided mutations. But they don't preclude it. This is their mistake.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

I bet you can't show why it is a mistake.

The mistake is self evident.After a work of maybe thousant of ys, during which epigenetic changes were accumulated together with many regulatory mechanisms,sudenly by a random mutation that most propably leads to a different direction of evolution all is cancelled and so all the previous work done is going astray. That is the stupidiest thing for nature to happen.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

It's almost as if Nature had no cognitive ability at all!

What is it so difficult to unnderstand? We all know that there is a continous information flow from environment to organisms and even to the genome,plenty of epigenetic changes loaded to particular genome areas, and many REGULATION MECHANISMS,constantly fuctioning. Do you ask, in this hard reality, if there is cognitive ability in nature? Of course not. It is a matter of choice between two, and only two, cases: either believe there is, or you think natural laws are enough to explain every thing. This is the hard fact. But now it is not our question for discussion. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

What is it so difficult to unnderstand? We all know that there is a continous information flow from environment to organisms and even to the genome,plenty of epigenetic changes loaded to particular genome areas, and many REGULATION MECHANISMS,constantly fuctioning. Do you ask, in this hard reality, if there is cognitive ability in nature? Of course not. It is a matter of choice between two, and only two, cases: either believe there is, or you think natural laws are enough to explain every thing. This is the hard fact. But now it is not our question for discussion. Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

You still think empathy guides evolution, don't you? After all these years you haven't given up on it, have you?Edited by Larni, : No reason given.Edited by Larni, : I missed some punctuation.

How is information flowing from the environment to my genome?

It is easy to know. Just read about epigenetics.

It isn't time for it yet.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

What a total cop-out. You don't have any idea what you're talking about, do you? If it really was easy you could just tell me rather than just doing a total dodge.You have no credibility and you're just making shit up. Its really kind of sad, actually. Where's the part where the information flows from the environment to my genome?

i give you time to be able to vomit all rotten material inside you.
On the opening post : As i said it is easy.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.Edited by zi ko, : No reason given.

Where are these two studies? Do you have a link for them? What are their findings? What is their evidence?Is so easy yet almost 200 posts in and you haven't provided anything.

Then why are you citing the paper? If you are just going to find papers to disagree with then this discussion can not move forward. What you need to find is a paper that outlines the mechanism that is responsible for guided mutations. In science, you need evidence for a mechanism before you can include it. Where is that evidence?

It doesn't matter if you think it is stupid or not. Random mutations is what the evidence indicates, and you have not presented any evidence that would lead us to consider guided mutations.